Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/April Fools' Day 2019

< April Fools' Day 2018	April Fools' Day 2020 >

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Stomp. (non-admin closure) jp×g 03:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elephant

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only thing notable about them is that their population has tripled in the last six months. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Awoo. (non-admin closure) jp×g 03:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Furry Fandom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

IF DEY HAV TE MUZZLE THEN GIVE THEM THE FUZZLE One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 23:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

add this here.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Transwiki to Encyclopedia Dramatica. Wibbity wobbity woo. (non-admin closure) jp×g 03:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LGL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:IGNORE. April Fools!!One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 15:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:40, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Death Star

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious hoax, everyone knows that a teenager cannot destroy a moon-sized space station armed with several thousand turbolasers and solar-powered ships while flying a space biplane. - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 23:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:40, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Canada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Why do we have an article on a place that isn't even real?^{[April Fools!]} Saucy^{[talk – contribs]} 22:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, eh —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, not much else to do aboot it eh? Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 22:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. They corrupt the children. JOE BRO 64 23:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (fictional)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Someone clearly forgot their towel with this one.^{[April Fools!]} Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 21:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

42 —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
42 per WP:GOLDENRULE. - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 22:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because it contains the answer to Life, the Universe and Everything and therefore is obviously notable. --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:FOOLS (non-admin closure) --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MacOS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly, Windows is superior.^{[April Fools!]} Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 21:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:IDONTLIKEIT. - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 23:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Knuckles the Echidna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ugandan Knuckles is a dead meme, and Wikipedia policy prohibits having articles for dead memes. (Pay no attention to that frog over there.) —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:52, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: do u kno da wae ? JOE BRO 64 21:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yacht

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Because they are not a collectable. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Citation needed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no citations in the article.^{[citation needed]} One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 20:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:42, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rule

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We're supposed to ignre these, per Ignore All Rules. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I ignore IAR. J 947^{'s public account} _{Merry Christmas (it is Christmas, right?)} 20:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. @TheJoebro64: Making computers run gooder is definitely something that this would accomplish. (aka April fools nom) --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

System32

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If we delete this our computers will run gooder.^{[April Fools!]} JOE BRO 64 19:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kept with regret (aka April fools nom) TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Super Mario Bros.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game that did absolutely nothing to the video game industry or popular culture.^{[April Fools!]} JOE BRO 64 19:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The movie was bad. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 23:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmie Johnson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How is this mediocre driver a 7 time champion? Needs to delete, rewrite entire page ^{[April Fools!]} Groig (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Dale Earnhardt since he's miles better, pun completely intended. X-Editor (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Portal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What even is this portal thing anyway? Does it take people to another dimension? If so, this page and the entire Portal namespace should be deleted immediately per WP:CSDD1 as a page that takes Wikipedia readers to another WikiVerse --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 17:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources at all, fails WP:V. I also came looking for an article about portals and instead found some non-notable stuff about Wikipedia portals. Confusing and unhelpful. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You monster One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 18:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate fate of the universe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 16:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Last Judgment. Qzekrom 💬 ^they_them 17:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with The Void per WP:MC. InvalidOS talk 17:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was the year 2016 and everything that happened that year being removed from existence. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:26, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2016

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has gone on long enough. Everything that supposedly happened in 2016, and everything that has happened since has clearly been an elaborate hoax. I mean, really. We're supposed to believe this stuff? Also nominating the following related articles, which describe events that clearly did not happen, or people, places, or things that clearly do not exist.:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(I mean, the Cubs, come ON?!?!)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Really? The guy from The Apprentice?)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obviously, these are all just leftover joke pages from some April Fool's day prank earlier this year. I bet if you check the history they were all created 1 April, 2015. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with WP:ARBCOM per WP:ARBCOM InvalidOS talk 17:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move to 2015 2. JOE BRO 64 20:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but there was in fact a year between 2015 and 2017. Still, I despised that year so we should jsut remove it from existence by deleting Wikipedia's article on it. (Thats how reality works, right?). Spirit of Eagle (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom - nice nomination statement TenPoundHammer TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Wiseau

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did not delete him, it's not true. It's bullshit, I did not delete him, I did naaaaaaht. O hai Mark. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Oh, hi Mark. Dark Knight 2149 17:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Darkknight2149: YOU ARE TEARING ME APART, LISA! Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Anyway, how's your sex life? JOE BRO 64 19:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Why is this being discussed. Obviously, Tommy has garned many major news articles and citations. He is our modern day Ed Wood, a literal pop culture icon of funny shitty films. Btw, has anyone seen the trailer for Tommy's latest film Big Shark. I think that could rival The Room as most hilarious bad film. User:Cardei012597 User talk:Cardei012597 Special:Contributions/Cardei012597 01:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:FOOLS (non-admin closure) --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IGNORE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'll let this one sit... One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 15:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 April 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:IAR. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 16:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nomination: Per WP:DENY. Wikipedia Secret Service 17:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was temporarily surpassed by PewDiePie. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

T-Series (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SUB2PEWDS ^{[April Fools!]} Outofmario (talk) 16:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HARDEST SPEEDY DELETE EVER with them most powerful diss track against them Wkc19 :) (talk) 17:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and add this diss track. One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 18:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this immediately Get rid of it and we win this war once and for all, since anything not on Wikipedia doesn't exist. Right?-AyyImHere (talk) 23:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clearly non-notable (aka April fools nom) TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

United States Declaration of Independence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Honestly, who actually believes they had paper in 1776? ^{[April Fools!]} Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 15:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Nicolas Cage. One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 16:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:IDONTLIKEIT ^{[April Fools!]} Outofmario (talk) 15:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SPEEDIEST DELETE EVER so the Bureaucratic Union can't harm us. X-Editor (talk) 20:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear G11 non-notable site that no one has ever heard of. What is a "Wiki-pedai" anyways? (aka April fools nom) TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable online encyclopedia website. Doesn't deserve a page here. ^{[April Fools!]} Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 15:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: never heard of it. SITH (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete clear G11 candidate. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clear conflict of interest. Let Encyclopedia Dramatica take this one. Dark Knight 2149 17:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest of all possible deletes; Wikipedia has directly caused over 10,000 instances of vandalism of Wikipedia this year alone and WP:DENY. Gimubrc (talk) 17:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Uncyclopedia. Qzekrom 💬 ^they_them 21:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Uranus or maybe perhaps Neptune because that is the only logical solution to this perennial debate. --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Water is clearly non-notable (aka April fools nom) TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Water

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Oh no! It is Dihydrogen monoxide which is a very toxic chemical. Therefore, it should be deleted from Wikipedia -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email})

Delete Dihydrogen Monoxide needs to be banned. Big chemichals were a big issue. One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 18:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete so the government can't put chemicals in the water that turn the friggin' frogs gay. X-Editor (talk) 20:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Hydroxylic acid. - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 23:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Redirecting is the best idea I've ever heard of in this case (aka April fools nom) TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recursion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's best to have this redirected to recursion. – The Grid (talk) 14:52, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this deletion discussion to complete the circle. Gimubrc (talk) 15:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Recursion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to recursion per Bilorv. — Bilorv (he/him) _(talk) 16:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect this article to Uranus and have the Uranus redirect here to create a loop. --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per Article 13 ^{[April Fools!]} Groig (talk) 13:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Brexit is our only hope. Said the American.One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 15:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Is there a reason or rationale for the deletion proposal? Absent a compelling reason and some form of relocation / merger proposal for this content, I say keep. Arllaw (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Arllaw: Assuming your question is serious - it's an April Fool's Day joke. Unless you're making a joke of your own.

Keep. BUT MUH FREEDOMS! *munch munch* French fries! *munch* epicgenius (talk) 20:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- *freedom fries —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:FOOLS (non-admin closure) --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Celeste (video game)

(View AfD · Mount Celeste)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Game has too many mirrors, delete per WP:NOTMIRROR InvalidOS talk 00:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Because it's interfering with other stuff and doesn't have enough participation to delete yet
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Even if it's an imgur mirror? [1] 14:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Delete 7.8/10 Too many mirrors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by One Blue Hat (talk • contribs) 15:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Interesting argument (aka April fools nom). TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:52, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Existence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This irretrievably fails WP:NPOV and WP:WEIGHT, to the point that it's impossible to write a neutral article. Simply put, the only sources we have are existing ones; even though this purports to cover both existence and nonexistence, there are absolutely no nonexistent sources here to counterbalance those which do exist. Furthermore, even if we did begin to use nonexistent sources they'd still fail WP:V, and any we could verify would by definition have to exist. Therefore, Wikipedia would be better off applying TNT to this mess at least until we can find a workaround enabling us to include nonexistent sources. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 05:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep nominator has obviously not even looked at the invisible and incorporeal list of nonexistent references. – Teratix ₵ 06:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:IAR. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The Matrix, did you know that in 2012 there was an robot uprising so we live in the matrix now Wkc19 :) (talk) 10:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Seems inherently circular (albeit not WP:CIRCULAR), since sources that prove that the concept of existence exists, exist. At least that is what I think. --bonadea contributions talk 10:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an obvious WP:HOAX —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:05, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clear lack of notability. There is no meaning to existence. Every breath we take, we move one step closer to our demise. We live our lives killing time, as time kills us. Dark Knight 2149 17:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE: WP:MILL encyclopedia article. Also fails WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:RELIABLE (fails to predict earthquakes), WP:ALPHABETJAMBLESBELONGINWIKIPEDIAARTICLES, and WP:PORNBIO. J 947^{'s public account} _{Merry Christmas (it is Christmas, right?)} 20:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Article 13'd. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Internet meme

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In compliance with the Article 13 of the EU Copyright Directive. Greed007 (talk) 07:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Banned by the request of the European Parliament and Our lord and saviour Wkc19 :) (talk) 09:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, your argument is invalid; ~~bad german man~~ Our lord and saviour has been Bought and himself banned by a more prosperous kind of hero._{Integral Python}^{click here to argue with me} 11:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Block and delete Article 13. Hands off our memes. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the Internet wouldn't exist without them. James-the-Charizard (talk) 13:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP THE NINE YEAR OLD ARMY CAN PROTECT US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 15:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Stick. The article is sticking around. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spiderman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spiderman: I don't feel so good Greed007 (talk) 07:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to WP:REICHSTAG. Jimbo, I don't feel so good... Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until Avengers: Endgame: This character was wiped from existence by Thanos. Dark Knight 2149 17:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; forget him, you and I could rule this city together. YOU CHOSE! JOE BRO 64 19:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:52, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thirteenth Doctor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I feel like being unoriginal today.^{[April Fools!]} ONR (talk) 04:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Fourteenth Doctor, because it's unlucky and therefore falls under this previous AfD Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because thirteen is unlucky. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Exterminate. Joanna Lumley is obviously the canonical Thirteenth Doctor. Andromedabluesphere440 (talk) 23:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I mean you're not wrong (non-admin closure) Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Wild

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Because it's a non-notable copycat of another film. Trainfan01 (talk), 03:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Portal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What even is this portal thing anyway? Does it take people to another dimension? If so, this page and the entire Portal namespace should be deleted immediately per WP:CSDD1 as a page that takes Wikipedia readers to another WikiVerse --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 17:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources at all, fails WP:V. I also came looking for an article about portals and instead found some non-notable stuff about Wikipedia portals. Confusing and unhelpful. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You monster One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 18:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to present. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Future

Should be deleted per WP:TOOSOON. InvalidOS talk 19:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, we can also delete April Fools' Day per WP:TOOSOON while we're at it. InvalidOS talk 19:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTCRYSTAL. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 02:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the safety of space and time because if this gets deleted, we need to delete the past and thus, the universe. James-the-Charizard (talk) 02:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to past, it's inevitable. Leviv ich 05:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and note that the Future begins with January 1, 2016. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 17:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why bother because the internet will all disappear soon. Margalob (talk) 23:51, 31 December 1999 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was send home. Fierce and love, Linguist111^{my talk page} 23:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

America's Next Top Model

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

6,857,328 beautiful articles stand before me, but I only have 6,857,328-1 photos in my hands and these photos represent the 6,857,328-1 articles that are still in the running towards becoming Wikipedia's Next Top Article. The article whose name I do not call must be deleted. *calls names of all articles except America's Next Top Model* Linguist111^{my talk page} 01:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subject it to damnatio memoriae per WP:IAR as a crime against humanity. Seriously, if aliens find this planet do you think this will make us look good? The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 06:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

42 (number)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as it an obviously non notable number. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 01:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. It is the meaning of life, the universe, and everything. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly in violation of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Cellar/Disused lavatory/Locked filing cabinet/Bottom (WP:BEWAREOFLEOPARD). Apathetic bloody editors, I've no sympathy at all. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 01:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment How could we delete Jackie Robinson’s number? Discrimination! Trillfendi (talk) 01:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Move to portal namespace. Also create portals for all the other integers that don't have one yet. Certes (talk) 01:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 24. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to meaning of life. James-the-Charizard (talk) 02:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly not a real number. "Forty-two" sounds so unnatural. 24 is so much better --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it's not Numberwang. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but Retire, as it's Jackie Robinson's number. Duh. - BilCat (talk) 05:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Demolish to make way for hyperspace bypass, we obviously need more bypasses. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 12:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hey! There was no previous notice for this hyperspace bypass! – The Grid (talk) 14:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 6 by 9 is not forty-two. The answer is obviously 54! Also you need to keep up with galactic news to know the bypass was coming! Your loss! One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 15:15, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move to 420. Dark Knight 2149 17:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kneel Before Me

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am sick of this new rule. Let’s just banish it.^{[April Fools!]} Jalen D. Folf (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ignore all rules —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Banish to the Phantom Zone. Dark Knight 2149 17:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Poor Pluto - April fools nom close. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pluto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NPLANET as it is a run of a mill dwarf planet. Probably should be redirected to Plutonium as that is notable.-KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Planet Nine, the actual not-totally-dwarf planet planet. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This Afd is among the most nonsensical Afd's I've ever seen. Pluto exists; it's a dwarf planet. Georgia guy (talk) 01:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pluto (Disney). -A lad insane (Channel 2) 01:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NOTPLANETDIRECTORY and my definition of GNG is 900,000 sources required. Any redirecting would cause confusion, and disambigs are too niche. J 947^{'s public account} _{Merry Christmas (it is Christmas, right?)} 01:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Uranus, Neptune, or any other planet. Then delete that as non-notable. James-the-Charizard (talk) 02:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Pluto is a planet.^{[citation needed]} —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep so we don't offend the dwarves. --SuperJew (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Irrelevant. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:23, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citizendium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A failed experimental Wiki whose active users can be counted on one hand. Long past the stage where it could meet WP:NWEB. At best, perhaps a merge to its predecessor, Nupedia. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Wikipedia as it is just a WP:MIRROR of Wikipedia. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 01:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both Wikipedia and Citizendium. But I think it's alright to keep Wikia and Nupedia because they can still be improved. Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Wikipedia. As a radical inclusionist, I believe that ALL wikis should be merged into Wikipedia. Benjamin (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Timeline of chemical element discoveries#Recorded discoveries. No News ! 07:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to potato. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Triangle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as it is WP:POINTy. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Pyramid. Because four triangles and a square make a pyramid. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I like my sines and tangents, thank you very much. epicgenius (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to potato so it is no longer pointy. --Dps04 (talk) 01:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to square, two triangles make a square. James-the-Charizard (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to square is by far the best idea I've seen. Potato is a close second. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Simplex per META:THEFOURTHDIMENSION InvalidOS talk 21:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:FOOLS. April Fools Day has ended (non-admin closure) --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent design

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not intelligent, and not designed intelligently. Delete per WP:FRINGE. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Split to creationism and Timecube. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Do you even lift, bruh? - God 17:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heisei period

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This era is coming to an end at the end of the month, and a replacement is to be announced today. We won't have a use for this article anymore: it's time for it to abdicate. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mami Kawada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Now I know what you're thinking: why would I want the article of my favorite singer to be deleted? Why do I want the article that I have the most edits to be deleted? Simple really: she retired! Thus she now fails WP:LASTING. If only she were still around then she'd still be notable, but alas, she's forgotten now. At best, suggesting a merge to Shakugan no Shana or A Certain Magical Index. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was saved by the 9-year old army.. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pewdiepie

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted as he was just passed by Uranus in subscribers and therefore is not notable. ^[4-1] -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subscribe to PewDiePie *trips edit filter* —T-Series (talk)
Redirect to The Annoying Orange. Pretty much the same thing anyway. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete T-Series, they suck!! Sincerely, the 9-year-`old army epicgenius (talk) 00:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! It's your big day, Uranus. —Wei4Green | 唯绿远大 (talk) 01:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)^[4-1][reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Formula One World Championship

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think we need an article on this: I mean it's just going to be another edition of #MercedesWinsLol. It's just going to be a duplicate of the previous seasons, so why bother? ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was haha very funny (keep), but I can foresee this getting political and NPA-y real quick, so I'm closing it. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 07:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary Clinton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She got Trumped. 'Nuff said. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Investigate her emails again because there’s no point for doing that that’s too much. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep her out of the White House --Dps04 (talk) 00:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the entire Clinton family as it is a disgrace to America. Eye snore 03:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Conservapedia... J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, along with the rest of 2016 and the fall out from it. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 17:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:FOOLS (non-admin closure) --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:15, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Pence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if this guy meets WP:GNG. Apparently he's just a powerless assistant to some low-paying job that people don't really want to get hired for, who can't even make his own decisions unless necessary. Is he notable? ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to somebody more notable. Margalob (talk) 00:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Convert him using federal fu- oh wait, let’s not go there. 😏Trillfendi (talk) 01:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Marlon Bundo. Zingarese talk · contribs 14:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, along with the rest of 2016 and the fall out from it. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 17:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance of American Football

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A "minor" "developmental" football league that might not even make it to the end of its inaugural season. Why bother with an article? Probably doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS. Or suggesting a merger with XFL (2020). ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:FOOLS (non-admin closure) --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:16, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Major League Soccer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not actually a major league (more like a retirement league), and not even major in either America or soccer. Thus it doesn't meet WP:NLEAGUE or WP:NSPORTS. I mean, does anyone even watch MLS? Does anyone actually care? If MLS disappeared tomorrow would anyone notice? I don't think so. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~GOOOOOOOAAAAALLL!~~ Keep. This league is notable because soccer has been America's sport of the future since 1972. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Red Card per WP:IDONTLIKEIT. James-the-Charizard (talk) 02:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Change title to "Major League FOOTBALL" 141.92.67.44 (talk) 08:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Seconded! Gimubrc (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fourthed! :) J 947^{'s public account} _{Merry Christmas (it is Christmas, right?)} 20:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Put it up for ransom. A few Garber Bucks is all that it would take. Sounder Bruce 21:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all sports articles, per WP:IDONTLIKEIT Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 21:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anime Festival Asia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

They've already quit Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia. Only Singapore remains: no Philippines or Vietnam to be seen. And no, the Hong Kong and Tokyo events don't count since they're actually C3 but rebranded. In any case, I don't think this yearly large and popular event meets WP:NEVENT. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:05, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Anime is overrated. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP NICO NICO NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was not saved. (non-admin closure) Linguist111^{my talk page} 23:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daylight saving time

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have had to wait until one o'clock in the morning to start making April Fool's AfDs thanks to daylight saving time. I wanted to start making them at midnight, but if I did that, the timestamp would still read 31 March. Not fair D8< Linguist111^{my talk page} 00:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It only pushes the start of April Fools Day on Wikipedia to 20:00 ET, so I see no need IMHO. Would suggest deleting standard time instead because WP:IDONTLIKEIT. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Be gone.--SkyGazer 512 ^{My talk page} 00:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Most of the world doesn't use it, so why should others? It's just a waste of time. I mean you must have screwed up if even Europe wants it gone. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I hate it!! Why do I have to get up at 5 in the morning instead of 6? It's UnFaIr AnD It ShOuLd Be RePeAlEd!!!1!!! epicgenius (talk) 00:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Daylight savings poisoned our water supply, burned our crops and delivered a plague unto our houses!--Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It did?! James-the-Charizard (talk) 02:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, but are we just going to wait around until it does?--Breawycker (talk to me!) 23:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one hour late we need standard time! James-the-Charizard (talk) 02:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all year long per WP:ILIKEIT. Natureium (talk) 03:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Portal:Daylight saving time. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hourglass so I can watch one hour of sand go through it. ^{[April Fools!]} Tropicalkitty (talk) 04:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Leave the EU then we can ignore their daylight saving bureaucracy. Daily Express fan club (talk) 12:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Make UTC follow DST year-round. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I want my nights back! Save our nights! Valley2city^‽ 20:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was disruptively deleted to prove a point then redirected to Patrick Star. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Point

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be deleted because of WP:POINT -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Uranus —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This was obviously a WP:POINTy nomination, please don't make nominations like that again.--SkyGazer 512 ^{My talk page} 00:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Patrick Star. He has a head! It ends in a point! Pointy pointy pointy! Pointy pointy point! This AFD is over, except for this line: you win this round, Broccoli! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as sharp corners and points are dangerous. James-the-Charizard (talk) 02:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Point per WP:POINT Gimubrc (talk) 15:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this AfD is obviously pointless. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 16:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see no point in keeping it around. -A lad insane (Channel 2) 17:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Yang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if this guy meets WP:NPOL and WP:LASTING. I mean, is he even a serious presidential candidate? Does he even have a chance of winning? I'm sorry Yang Gang but I think he's too insignificant for Wikipedia. At best, maybe a merge to 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:02, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Secure The Bag: Where's the money where's the money? We have the money. Put the money in our hands. —Wei4Green | 唯绿远大 (talk) 01:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was blown up by the Death Star. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Earth

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious hoax. This is actually the 10th nomination, but ADMIN ABUSE! —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 23:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Venus, its far more beautiful and notable twin. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:02, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Uranus because that is the only solution for any AFD debate. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't know why those crazy "scientists" came up with the ridiculous idea that Earth exists. We all know that there is no such thing as Earth or science.--SkyGazer 512 ^{My talk page} 00:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-bureaucrat comment) This is actually the 11th nomination. –~~MJL ‐Talk‐~~^{1 April} 00:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth (10th nomination). —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nuke, salt, and wipe it. I say we blow it all up and start over. epicgenius (talk) 00:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge At the rate we’re going there will be no Earth left! Merge with Mars. Trillfendi (talk) 01:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete all'. Look, at this point we've probably peaked, and everyone clearly knows that. I mean, with all that stuff going on lately it's going to be a downhill journey from now on. IMO, we should just delete the whole english wikipedia now and be done with it. Alpha3031 (t • c) 01:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Disc. the Earth is obviously flat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by InvalidOS (talk • contribs) 02:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep due to nominator clearly being in a timewarp and thus not present on said planet at the time of this nomination being filed. Triptothecottage (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep – I don't think we've gotten all the valuable minerals out yet. Leviv ich 05:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Demolish to make way for a hyperspace bypass, this is long overdue. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 12:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What harm can it do? – The Grid (talk) 14:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but WP:TNT. What's this bullshit? The Earth is round? Antarctica's at the bottom and the Arctic's at the top? Nonono. The Earth is flat. Antarctica keeps the water from evaporating into space. The Arctic is the center of the universe. Who wrote this?JOE BRO 64 19:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was grounded until the Note 7 flies over the moon. @Narutolovehinata5: April fools nom close. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 737 MAX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The plane is currently grounded worldwide, I suggest we also delete the article until the investigations are done and the planes are flying again. This article is too unsafe to fly. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Samsung Galaxy Note 7. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:15, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Crash the plane with the McDonnell Douglas DC-10 ^{[April Fools!]} --SansUT (talk | contributions) 02:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dismantle before another crash! James-the-Charizard (talk) 02:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ground to draft Yeah, the MAX has been misbehaving, so Boeing sentenced the plane to the draft namespace.
Delete Completely unsafe. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per safety concerns --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:FOOLS (non-admin closure) --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 01:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brexit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What a mess, Parliament can't even agree on a way to move forward? It seems our only solution is to #CancelBrexit altogether and #RevokeArticle50. Time to delete Brexit and pretend this craziness ever happened, it's as dead as May's deal. Also nominating the following people and organizations for deletion for "helping" us lead to this mess:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Time to put Brexit out of its misery. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for one more month. Margalob (talk) 00:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - sick of hearing about it. It's time for Brexit to make its Wikipexit! Linguist111^{my talk page} 00:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Might as well delete House of Commons as it's part of the mess. --Dps04 (talk) 00:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vote to remove from EU. ^{[April Fools!]} --SansUT (talk | contributions) 00:52, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Do people realise that this will go to DRV many, many times? :) J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - we need have a People's vote on this 141.92.67.44 (talk) 08:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Hobson's choice – The Grid (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Theresa May who has caused this mess with a bad deal. Keep the rest because they are useful. ^{[April Fools!]} Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, along with the rest of 2016 and the fall out from it. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 17:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge back into the EU. Saucy^{[talk – contribs]} 21:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was to just simply get gud. ^{[April Fools!]} (non-admin closure) --SansUT (talk | contributions) 23:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rubik's Cube

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't solve the Rubik's Cube problem I created on my own, that's why it should be removed. --SansUT (talk | contributions) 00:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cube as that should fix your problem. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ernő Rubik as it’s his creation. James-the-Charizard (talk) 03:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to time cube. Margalob (talk) 16:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to this AfD because it contains all the information about it. J 947^{'s public account} _{Merry Christmas (it is Christmas, right?)} 20:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. @Narutolovehinata5: WOW, I can't believe this was a nomination . April fools nom close. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WOW air

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Considering the airline collapsed a few days ago and is no longer extant, it doesn't make sense for us to have an article on it anymore. Suggest deletion or perhaps a merge to Icelandair. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, isn't WOW when I ~~tell~~ flip over MOM jokes? epicgenius (talk) 00:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
**company goes belly up** Eye snore 03:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I never heard of this airline before. Yeah let's delet. ^{[April Fools!]} --SansUT (talk | contributions) 01:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with 737 Max. WOW air took a nose dive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by One Blue Hat (talk • contribs) 15:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but sell to Icelandair, Blizzard or Willy on Wheels. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. April fools nom (non-admin closure) Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obviously useless. Fails every notability guideline imaginable. Find more important stuff to do, like file a complaint against an experienced editor at WP:ANNIE and get indeffed within 10 seconds.^{[April Fools!]}--SkyGazer 512 ^{My talk page} 00:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nuke and send to Uranus as that is the only sensible option. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wrong venue 58.119.3.26 (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this and consider removing Category: Proposed Deletion while we're at it. Gimubrc (talk) 13:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: because we can't let non-admins have a monopoly on relisting ansh 666 20:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 20:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Th fllwng dscssn s n rchvd dbt f th prpsd dltn f th rtcl blw. Pls d nt mdfy t. Sbsqnt cmmnts shld b md n th pprprt dscssn pg (sch s th rtcl's tlk pg r n a dltn rvw). N frthr dts shld b md t ths pg.

Th rslt ws Kp. WP:FLS (nn-dmn clsr) --KP03(^{Tlk • Cntrbtns • ml}) 00:18, 2 prl 2019 (TC)

Vwl

Fnd srcs: Ggl (bks · nws · nwspprs · schlr · fr mgs · WP rfs) · FNS · JSTR · NYT · TWL

Prsnlly w shld tlk wtht thm ^{[prl Fls!]} SgWtr (tlk) 00:57, 1 prl 2019 (TC)

Dlt - Y knw, Hbrw nd Rbc srvv wtht vwls. F thy cn d tht, s cn Nglsh. Nrtlvhnt5 ^tccsdnw 00:56, 1 Prl 2019 (TC)
Dlt r Mv t Vwl pr nm. Lngst111^{my tlk pg} 02:21, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Spdy Kp fr f w gt rd f ll vwls, hw wll w spk prprly? Jms-th-Chrzrd (tlk) 02:53, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Dlt pr nm. W dn't nd ny vwls (sm wrds hv n vwls, fr xmpl, crwth). y snr 03:23, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Trnswk t Frnch Wkpd s th r tdtd hr. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:07, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Spdy Dlt Th rtcl s ptnt nnsns; thr s n nd t g thrgh a stndrd dltn dscssn. Sprt f gl (tlk) 04:29, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
mrg w/ tsktsks –~~MJL ‐Tlk‐~~^{1 prl}04:31, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Cmmnt F dltd, sggst n dt fltr t prvnt ny mr vwls frm vr bng sd n Wkpd. (Ls: s Y ncldd n ths nmntn?) – Trtx ₵ 06:08, 1 Prl 2019 (TC)
ee - IA (A) 06:11, 1 Ai 2019 (U)
Dlt - N n nds ths slly vwls. Kds ths dys dn't vn s thm nywys. —k6k 🍁 (Tlk · Cntrbtns) 13:05, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Spdy Cnsnnt bcs cnsnnt. InvldS tlk fftn zr ght, n prl twnt nntn, (TC)
Kp vwls nt ncssr bt cnsdr: ltn dd lng 2 bt stll nd 4 ctnt; ths kp vwl 4 hstrcl prps Gmbrc (tlk) 15:41, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Spdy kp. Vwls r mprtnt, vn f th r cnfsng n nglsh. f w d dlt thgh, wht d w d bt Y? —Pythncdr (tlk | cntrbs) 16:03, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
- lttr b4 z = vwl; thrfr dlt 4 grt jstc. Gmbrc (tlk) 17:06, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Dlt nd mv th mssng vwls t nly Cnnct. — Blrv (h/hm) _(tlk) 16:39, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Cmmnt Ds "y" cnt? cnt s "y" "r" r ""! Wht th fck s ths!? — Prcdng nsgnd cmmnt ddd b n Bl Ht (tlk • cntrbs) 19:59, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
- lttr b4 z cts s vwl smtms ths = vwl; rmv Gmbrc (tlk) 18:31, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
Dlt W dn't nd vwls nywys, s whts th pnt f hvng ths rtcl? Dlphn (sqk?) 20:37, 1 prl 2019 (TC)
- hmns dnt nd thr ppndx, bt w hv rtcl 4 thm stll. Gmbrc (tlk) 18:38, 1 prl 2019 (TC)

Th fllwng dscssn s n rchvd dbt f th prpsd dltn f th rtcl blw. Pls d nt mdfy t. Sbsqnt cmmnts shld b md n th pprprt dscssn pg (sch s th rtcl's tlk pg r n a dltn rvw). N frthr dts shld b md t ths pg.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Wellstone

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Every source in this article was written by either a Democrat or a Republican. We need third party sources. Khemehekis (talk) 06:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trump wall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This project isn't notable! Let's get rid of it! ^{[April Fools!]} EggRoll97 ^(talk) 08:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We can spend better our small loan of a million dollars!One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 15:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I heard Mexico was paying for it. Dark Knight 2149 17:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NUKE per IAR is a good option @起司狗:. April fools nom close. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Don't delete the main page

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Someday the main page should be deleted. 起司狗 (talk) 08:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete let the revolution commence! Wkc19 :) (talk) 10:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:IAR — Preceding unsigned comment added by One Blue Hat (talk • contribs) 16:02, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nuke the page per WP:IGNORE --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was I CAN DO ANYTHING! (jevil closure) Jevil (talk) 00:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deltarune

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Jevil said that he wanted the page deleted.^[1] InvalidOS talk 12:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per previous reasoning. As stated (with a reliable cite from the creator), Jevil can do anything. ^{[April Fools!]} Lafayette Baguette ^talk 13:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ralsei Says No How can you say no and delete to a cute face like Ralsei's? Wkc19 :) (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Indeed, as Jevil is capable of anything, his will supersedes any rules or regulations for Wikipedia. Retroity (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Epsilonrune. Gimubrc (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
'Welp, Undertale's gonna have a bad time.'One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 16:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "I CAN DO ANYTHING.", Jevil, October 31, 2018.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Spirit of Eagle's pizza party being catered by Spider-Man. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man 2 (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is too much pizza in this game. ^{[April Fools!]} - pivotman319 (📫) 13:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pizza Time Pizza Time Wkc19 :) (talk) 14:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, the original animal/pizza cross-over. Anything else is merely mimicking its movements. Samsara 14:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pizza. Outofmario (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA! AHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! You serious?One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 15:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rent: We will delete this article... When you FIX THIS DAMN DOOR! Dark Knight 2149 17:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Add Pepperoni for good food. James-the-Charizard (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete anchovies —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was good puns. @One Blue Hat: April fools nom close. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Casino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

April Fools! As the good nature of Wikipedia, we cannot take a gamble at allowing people to fall to adiction. I bet anyone with a full deck will agree that this is too diecey of a topic to allow in the house. If we play our cards right, we can keep the good nature of Wikipedia on the table. One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 15:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 🙵♏︎♏︎◻︎. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wingdings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

🕈︎♒︎♋︎⧫︎ ♓︎■︎ ⧫︎♒︎♏︎ ■︎♋︎❍︎♏︎ □︎♐︎ ♑︎□︎♎︎ ♎︎□︎♏︎⬧︎ ⧫︎♒︎♓︎⬧︎ ♍︎❒︎♋︎◻︎ ♏︎❖︎♏︎■︎ ❍︎♏︎♋︎■︎✏︎✍︎✍︎✍︎✍︎ ♓︎⧫︎🕯︎⬧︎ ◻︎◆︎❒︎♏︎ ■︎□︎■︎⬧︎♏︎■︎⬧︎♏︎ ⧫︎♒︎♋︎⧫︎ ❍︎♋︎🙵♏︎ ⬧︎ ■︎□︎ ⬧︎♏︎■︎⬧︎♏︎ ♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎♋︎ One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 16:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was doesn't delete sys32 virus. @Pythoncoder, One Blue Hat, and InvalidOS: April fools nom close. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rm (Unix)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

sudo rm -rf /
echo APRIL FOOLSOne Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 16:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I tried the above code but it still didn’t delete the System32 virus. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per automatic Windows 95 install + CIH combo. InvalidOS talk 22:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an - e article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

King Crimson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Incomprehensible. I fail to understand how this one works. It skips time, b - rstand it. It even seems to affect this AFD. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand ei - n work? A Dolphin (squeek?) 20:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussi - dify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. . April fools nom close. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Chad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obviously copyright infringement of Flag of Romania. -PrussianOwl (talk) 16:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

(non-admin closure) The result was Homelessness. One Blue Hat missed work because of his vehicular situation and Darkknight2149 has no access to their house. Dark Knight 2149 01:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted for a few minutes so Darkknight2149 could get back in . --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lock

I seem to have locked myself out of my house. Can someone please delete this for a few minutes so I can get back in? Dark Knight 2149 17:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I need to get in my car too. AAA has done nothing for me. One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 19:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Key, so you can get back in in the Future! Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 22:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Uranus Locks Inc., the best brand of locks that you can buy in the entire Solar system --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Life. This deletion proposal is dead. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Death

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So we can all be IMMORTAL!!!^{[April Fools!]} Qzekrom 💬 ^they_them 17:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strongest possible speedy delete – death is the worst thing in the universe. I mean that seriously. Linguist111^{my talk page} 17:52, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Life. --KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:57, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 快速保留. 我看不懂这个胡话! (non-admin closure) Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

English language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant hoax.^{[April Fools!]} Qzekrom 💬 ^they_them 17:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleter pour le moninateur, l'anglais n'est pas une vraie langue. Gimubrc (talk) 17:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GHOTI!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by One Blue Hat (talk • contribs) 18:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools nom TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:07, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Referendum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:BEANS Samsara 18:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to word.. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

birds

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

They are not real, have you seen the evidence?^{[April Fools!]} Wkc19 :) (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] "I CAN DO ANYTHING.", Jevil, October 31, 2018.

[1]