Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earthtron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ultra Monsters. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Earthtron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of The Return Of Ultraman through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unimportant article. --One of the Many! (talk) 20:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. The character makes a few appearances throughout the series, so a redirect to Ultra Monsters may be in order, but I doubt that anyone is actually going to search for this. Nonetheless, I would support a redirect if consensus goes that way. The article has no sources, and I can find no sources. I suggest deletion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per the above poster's partially correct logic filtered through WP:ATD: If there's a valid merge or redirect target, we merge or redirect it, since redirects are cheap and sourced content can always go to a parent article. Jclemens (talk) 04:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.