Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipediaism
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipediaism
Really this is someone's essay. I almost speedied it, but thought I'd get a consensus. The word is a neologism, getting only a few tens of google hits (several of which use to mean something different). The entire work is original research or possibly a report on someone's non-notable research. DJ Clayworth 15:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per nom. PJM 16:02, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. If the page creator wanted to transfer it to a subpage in his userspace and tag it as an essay, I'd be OK with that as well. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 16:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- And a pretty poor essay as well. Delete Emeraude 16:08, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.