Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 March 13

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< March 12	March 14 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vulcan (Star Trek)#Mating drive. Less Unless (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pon farr

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The 2007 AFD (no consensus) already noted a lack of in-universe and real-world notability; even Sexuality in Star Trek only mentions this concept as a See also link. I would driveby-redirect this to Vulcan (Star Trek)#Mating drive where IMO this is already sufficiently covered, but I just know it would get reverted. – sgeureka ^t•c 23:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. – sgeureka ^t•c 23:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1, 2, 3, 4. Four reasonable academic sources, which all appear non-trivial from snippet/preview view, and plenty more on Google Scholar (if you add -"Pon Farr Press" to the search string) suggest that this is actually a notable topic. No real objection to a merge, but it's clear it has enough coverage for independent notability. Jclemens (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Vulcan (Star Trek) as per nomination. Lack of independent coverage and real-world notability. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 02:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vulcan (Star Trek)#Mating drive, this seems like a WP:OVERLAP with the article about their fictional race even regardless of whether or not it's notable, but right now it's entirely WP:OR. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a WP:SS breakout, not an OVERLAP, as you can see by the "main" template in the article section, so the expectation would be to merge the material back appropriately. Jclemens (talk) 04:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. This may be notable, but what we have here is a 99% unreferenced WP:FANCRUFT/WP:OR. WP:TNT can be applied. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vulcan (Star Trek)#Mating drive - This is a WP:NOPAGE situation, where even if the topic has coverage in reliable sources, it would be much better covered on the main topic on the fictional Vulcan race in general rather than split out. Merging would not be appropriate in this case because this current article has no material that would be suitable to merge - those sources found by Jclemens above can likely be used to bolster the section in the main Vulcan article, but as they are not currently included in this article, merging is not needed to do that. Rorshacma (talk) 17:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Vulcan (Star Trek). I think there is some interest in the topic, and each episode that mentions it links to it, but I don't think it's enough to be its own article. --Mgp28 (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or possibly Merge but I notice the article is badly sourced and looks like cruft. I don't think there is massive interest in the episode, it wasn't one of the best. I don't see enough for a standalone article. scope_creep^Talk 09:47, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or redirect due to sourcing issues. Needs more independent coverage and would be a mention as part of a broader Star Trek topic. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Less Unless (talk) 20:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marta Moszczenska

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. 2 of the sources are primary, another one is a 1 line mention. LibStar (talk) 23:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 00:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per the nomination. Charsaddian (talk) 06:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Moldova, Romania, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:16, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 18:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article subject lacks sufficient WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:NOTABILITY and satisfy WP:GNG. On top of this, the article subject also fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Shawn Teller (talk) 23:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to New York State Route 37#History. From what I gather, this is the correct Merge target. If not, you can correct the notices. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Louisville, New York bus-truck crash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. It is just a routine car crash with no lasting importance. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and New York. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mentioned in New York State Route 37#History already; redirect and merge as appropriate. Nate • (chatter) 18:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this was more than a routine car crash. Typically, when commercial vehicles like buses are involved in traffic accidents and there are multiple fatalities, the NTSB gets involved and news coverage will go beyond just a simple report on the event itself. Would be okay with a merge to New York State Route 37 but I wouldn't dismiss this topic as NOTNEWS. Highway 89 (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think an investigation from the NTSB makes an event notable. Also, there was not an NTSB investigation mentioned in the article. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it does either, but it was worth pointing out that this was more significant than a run-of-the-mill car crash. Highway 89 (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 23:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any continuing coverage of the crash, small number of deaths, while tragic is somewhat to be expected in crashes of this nature. Oaktree b (talk) 13:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There is nothing that sets this particular crash apart from the thousands(?) that occur every year. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bulgaria at the 1964 Summer Olympics. as an ATD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bogdan Ivanov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He competed at two Olympic Games but didn't win medals in either and I couldn't find sources with a WP:BEFORE search to otherwise show notability. There isn't a clear redirect but Bulgaria at the 1964 Summer Olympics may be best as that's the Olympics he ranked highest in. Suonii180 (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - An old article that could be permanently affected by newer and possibly temporary rules that aide deletion.KatoKungLee (talk) 03:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KatoKungLee: you should explore the Quantum Multiverse Theory of Notability. // Timothy :: talk 03:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Bulgaria. Suonii180 (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Alvaldi (talk) 21:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would also support redirecting to Bulgaria at the 1964 Summer Olympics. Alvaldi (talk) 10:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I found BNR which looks really good. If there is another source out there of a similar calibre, this should be kept and expanded. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - (unless / until more sources turn up) - to Bulgaria at the 1964 Summer Olympics. Ingratis (talk) 10:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 23:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOLYMPICS. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bulgaria at the 1964 Summer Olympics. BEFORE showed stats, mentions, nothing SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Per nom, fails WP:GNG, BIO SNGs and NOLYMPICS. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 02:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gadgets in The Wild Wild West

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Un-sourced list, nothing finding sourcing for the items in the list. Oaktree b (talk) 23:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 23:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Lists. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This section was overwhelming the actual Wild Wild West tv series page, so I followed the example of the "List of James Bond gadgets" wikipage and put them on a separate page. This had been mentioned on the Wild Wild West talk page.Plummer (talk) 00:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A pointless split due to the entirely WP:OR nature of the list; this information should simply have been removed and nothing more. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Total WP:FANCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 09:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above delete lvoters. Unlike Star Trek for example, the WWW gadgets achieved no cultural traction. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Completely unsourced list of trivia that fails WP:LISTN. While there are some sources upon searches that mention the show's gadgets, they are the type that would support a few sentences on the topic in the main article, not this massive spinout list. Rorshacma (talk) 17:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:LISTN. At most, this might warrant a sentence in the main article. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:LISTN I do not see enough blue links so I do not see this aiding in navigation or providing information. Lightburst (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article is effectively a WP:FANCRUFT repository. The subject alone doesn’t satisfy WP:LISTN. Shawn Teller (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Terence Charles Bacon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marked for notability concerns 10 years. No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations, Albania, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Yugoslavia, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Due to the multiple issues mentioned on the main page. Charsaddian (talk) 06:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I did the normal web/newspaper/scholar searches and got nothing that could support an article. Lamona (talk) 01:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Spoils Tournament Experience

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find anything to advance notability. Seems like an advertisement push for some kind of game that was apparently a flop. Found "zero" on the game. The STE points section states: "However, currently, due to financial difficulties, the cruise has been canceled until further notice". Otr500 (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The game won an Origins Award, but I don't know how much coverage it received beyond that. BOZ (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Couldn't find anything other than a smattering of reviews, some product listings, and a few forum posts. — SamX [talk · contribs] 02:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to show it meets WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Less Unless (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rajender Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Feel good article, I'm not seeing BLP being met. Shipping oxygen to India is noble, but not wiki worthy. Nothing found for this business person. Oaktree b (talk) 23:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 23:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Rajasthan, and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Stereotypical WP:Vanispamcruftisment Plutonium27 (talk) 15:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The controversy part and available references make him notable. passes WP:BASIC. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mankishalberto (talk • contribs) 05:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG, BIO, 1E. A minor controversy doesn't make someone notable. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 06:44, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see a lot of citations to aggregated content, articles without bylines, interviews, and some mentions that are not in-depth coverage. Not enough to justify a WP:BLP. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Less Unless (talk) 20:18, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yashesh Acharya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sources to suggest that he meets WP:FILMMAKER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. His claim to notability is apparently being involved in a world record but the film that allegedly broke this world record does not seem to be notable itself so I cannot see how Acharya, as its associate director, would be notable. None of his novels seem to have gained any media attention either. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No WP:RS to support WP:Notability; plenty WP:Autobio Plutonium27 (talk) 15:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly doesn't pass WP:FILMMAKER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG Khorang 09:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:FILMMAKER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG, sources in the article are all promotional. BEFORE showed no reviews of films or writings that has SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 01:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article subject isn’t covered in any significant depth by reliable independent secondary sources, e.g. fails WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR and WP:FILMMAKER. Shawn Teller (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mustafa Babanli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF. Refs are passing mentions. Scopus shows nothing of significance, nor GS. Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 22:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Science, and Azerbaijan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sources in Azerbaijani exist (1, 2, 3, 4, & 5). AmshitBalcon (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these WP:PRIMARY. Him doing a speech or an interview. Really need secondary sources WP:SECONDARY to satisfy WP:BLP. I don't think he passes WP:NPROF and I don't think I can see any reviews for books or chapters he's written. Being a rector doesn't make you automatically notable. At least I don't think so. scope_creep^Talk 23:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the rector of this university has the "highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution" then he is notable per WP:PROF#C6. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:PROF#C6. From what I can see, rector is indeed the head of what in this case appears to be a historic and nationally-significant university. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I wasn't sure. I do remember a rector getting elected at my uni years ago and it didn't seem such a big thing at the time. I'll leave this open for a couple of days, even though it is settled in the hope that some drive-by Azerbaijan editor can add some more references. scope_creep^Talk 09:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Rector" can mean very different things in different countries. I do not know what it means in Azerbaijan. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it means the Dean or head of academics for a college or major university division. // Timothy :: talk 15:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I think this passes WP:PROF#C6, needs better referencing. More notable than 95% of the athletes and actors on Wikipedia. Since it is a BLP, I removed the material that was unsourced since 2015. // Timothy :: talk 15:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Caprica (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a fairly pointless disambiguation page now. It once disambiguated a lot of pages, but not anymore, as they got removed due to being plotcruft. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: pointless disam. // Timothy :: talk 15:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Movsisyan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to find any sources that would comply with WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG and no achievements that meet WP:NTENNIS. She does not appear to have won or participated in a tournament in either singles or doubles that would make her automatically notable. In terms of coverage in the English language, I found nothing better than Armenpress, a single passing mention in a list of players called up to a Fed Cup tie. Surprisingly, there was very little in Armenian either. Tert was the best that I could find but it's a painfully brief tournament recap for a minor tournament. The coverage is so weak that it doesn't even give basic details of the matches that she won, it simply states that she won and nothing else. Clear consensus at sportspeople AfDs that this is not good enough to justify an article for a BLP. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Tennis, and Armenia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

’’Delete’’ no evidence of notability. Nocturnal781 (talk) 21:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Couldn't find any secondary, independent source covering the subject significantly, even in Armenian. Fails WP:GNG. AmshitBalcon (talk) 22:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note - I tried to find anything she did other than Fed Cup, and struck out. No special awards or achievements from her own country. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:54, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asa Elliott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bit-part actor. Barely acted. Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Now working in supermarket. Bit-part panto. scope_creep^Talk 21:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Theatre, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete starving actor, not meeting GNG. Bit parts, nothing for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Out of the five sources attached one is an IMDB profile, two are a dead links, one is a user-generated profile on his representative agency's website (Lowy Hamilton Artists), and a passing mention on the Guardian piece:
Last month, Asa Elliot, who appeared in the ITV sitcom Benidorm between 2010 and 2014, told BBC Look North he had been working as an Asda delivery driver since July last year. Elliot had been singing on cruise ships before the virus struck.
Fails WP:GNG. AmshitBalcon (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He tried to follow his dreams but it didn't work out, and now he has a day job like the rest of us. Sorry, but that does not make him notable per WP:NACTOR or WP:NMUSICIAN, despite some honest work in minor productions back in the day. He does have a news article here: [1], but it was probably the result of a press release in which he tried to drum up some more publicity in a "where are they now" sort of way. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Selangor F.C.. If there is content worth Merging, an editor can find it on the Redirected page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Selangor F.C. III & IV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable youth club division Avilich (talk) 21:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Malaysia. Avilich (talk) 21:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Selangor F.C.#Reserve teams as a valid WP:ATD. Not notable enough for a separate article. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's only mentioned there because there is an article, but if this isn't kept this won't be the case anymore, so it should not be redirected there. Avilich (talk) 03:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They should be mentioned in passing there anyway, even if it's just one sentence saying there are youth teams, and listing names and age groups. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Add it to the main Selangor FC page. I don't think it would be a problem and you wouldn't lose any info.I don't know if there will ever be a lot of info since they are 3rd and 4th teams.KatoKungLee (talk) 17:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails per GiantSnowman. The article has unsourced info about LPs so it should be deleted and then if there is a consensus redirected. // Timothy :: talk 15:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Barhorst

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:BIO. No effective references. No WP:SECONDARY sources in refs. scope_creep^Talk 20:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not finding anything beyond the usual PR-heavy, short "executive profiles" in various magazines, which he probably submitted himself. The one possible good source is SmartBusiness Magazine, but the content of that lengthy article is mainly his own statements; it does not meet "independent". Much of what is in the WP article is not found in any sources that I looked at. BTW, the article was started by a user:Barhorst, but also worked on by a number of SPAs and a bunch of socks that have been banned. Lamona (talk) 02:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Lamona. Most of the sources are at best PR churnalism. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lanie Alabanza-Barcena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We could not establish notability, with no changes since the last notification in 2020 Bexaendos (talk) 20:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Fashion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: The GlobalGrind piece is not that great but somewhat okay compared to the rest of the sources. The other sources are either user-generated profiles, or interviews. Both the Early life and the Other projects sections are written like a resume and need substantial editing. AmshitBalcon (talk) 22:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not seeing enough indepth coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the sources here are substantially about her, and some don't mention her at all. I found one more video interview, and an article by her about herself. The remainder are brief mentions or name-checks on advertisements for products. Possibly TOO SOON. Lamona (talk) 02:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Might be TOOSOON, but Wikipedia isn't a place for resumes. Sources in article and BEFORE, showed promos, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 15:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 21:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Union Labour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. I don't even see mentions of this subject, never mind the RS which would be needed for notability. JMWt (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada. JMWt (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Couldn't find any source for Union Labour. I even looked for old archived print sources, and nothing comes up. Fails WP:ORG. AmshitBalcon (talk) 19:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All sources I found were referring to the UK party of the same name, even documents that purported to be about Canada. It sounds like this was a breakout group that never achieved "real party" status. There may be info in archives, but that would be Original Research. Lamona (talk) 02:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unsourced and forgotten OR from 2004. At best this was a short lived fringe group with nothing of LASTING impact in their history. // Timothy :: talk 16:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Countess Free Church, Ely. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Connexions Free Church, Ely

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Search suggests that this entity fails WP:ORG. Page was created by a member per this admission. ~T P W 18:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Christianity, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Countess Free Church, Ely, which has undoubted notability as a Grade II-listed building mentioned in Christopher Stell 's Nonconformist Chapels and Meeting-houses in Eastern England (2002). New Connexions Free Church is a church plant from this but has no independent notability. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 19:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/merge to Countess Free Church, Ely per Hassocks. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Countess Free Church, Ely, as suggested above. There is no reason to think that this church is independently notable. Athel cb (talk) 08:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect -- The target is a much better article. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:41, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Morassutti family. as an ATD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Morassutti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ROUTINE biography of a local businessman from Italy, apparently written by a family member, who has since been blocked as a sockpuppet. The corresponding article at it.wikipedia.org was deleted in 2019. Belbury (talk) 18:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Couldn't find any good sources for the subject; all that comes up is either a passing mention or genealogy chart website. Fails GNG and WP:BIO. AmshitBalcon (talk) 19:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Patents and the other sources used don't show notability. I can't find anything for this person. Feels like a MEMORIAL, which wiki is not. Oaktree b (talk) 20:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject is notable. Check multiple reliable sources such as this, this, this, and this.151.82.84.5 (talk) 23:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge properly sourced material into Morassutti family. Subject doesn't pass GNG or BIO, but there is a nice home for it here. Also no reason to fragment the content, even if subject squeeks by notability, does not mean there must be another two penny stub article and in this case properly sourced content has a much better place. // Timothy :: talk 16:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KB Ballentine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find sources which demonstrate that either WP:BIO or WP:CREATIVE are satisfied. Whilst there are numerous sources cited, they merely confirm that she has published poetry, but it does not appear to have attracted any critical commentary in reliable sources. SmartSE (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and Tennessee. SmartSE (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why these categories are questionable. They are a poet. They are from Tennessee in the United States. Canestrari (talk) 20:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt this is related to this author's gender. It appears it has more to do with the credibility of the sources that were cited. My mistake. When they get on the NYT, then maybe they will be "credible" enough for this editor. Canestrari (talk) 19:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have also removed any gender-specific references. I wasn't sure if this was an issue, so did this for good measure anyway. Canestrari (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've provided a list of sources and some of them include numerous articles that support her creative work. She is a poet, not a novelist. Can you recommend some additional sources that offer reliable critical commentary for poetry, other than books? Canestrari (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.wutc.org/arts-culture/2021-04-21/talking-writing-kb-ballentine-part-i

https://www.chattanoogan.com/2022/7/6/452024/Chattanooga-Author-Showcase-Features.aspx

https://www.pw.org/directory/writers/kb_ballentine Canestrari (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't find any in-depth coverage of them. Fails WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I was hoping this would be a keep, but nothing with SIGCOV for a BLP. // Timothy :: talk 16:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pickerington Junior High Schools

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable primary school. Does not meet WP:GNG. Could be redirected to the school district, where both schools are mentioned, but that was contested. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. I oppose a redirect since "Pickerington Junior High Schools" is not the name of a school and therefore an unlikely search term. However, the two individual junior high schools should be redirected to the district page (both currently redirect the "Pickerington Junior High Schools" page). Frank Anchor 17:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Ohio. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is for helping spread information. So why would you delete a page if it has correct and accurate information. Jokerpower71 (talk) 18:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Frank Anchor; it fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. ¹⁴¹ Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 19:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing found for GNG, it's just another high school. Oaktree b (talk) 20:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This article was moved to two different page titles, turned into a redirect and the content cut & pasted into a new article. This was highly disruptive and has all been reverted. Please do not do this again. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:10, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Matee Rajput

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Hair transplant doctor to the stars" is not notable. I don't find any sourcing, or understand why this person gets a wikipedia article. Oaktree b (talk) 16:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 16:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ABHammad (talk) 14:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not even close... // Timothy :: talk 16:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vegan Women Summit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourcing is all promotional routine coverage, no evidence of independent sources establishing notability. Jdcooper (talk) 16:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Organizations. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promo and no sourcing outside of vegan PR releases. Oaktree b (talk) 16:46, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No WP:RS: very WP:Advert. Plutonium27 (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: anthing about vegans out of spite. Also clearly promo. // Timothy :: talk 16:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Choose Love (organisation). Article history remains if anyone wants to selectively merge any well-sourced content. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 18:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lliana Bird

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about Noel Fielding's partner. She has presented a few radio shows, and appeared in a few plays, and been a guest on a few TV newscasts, and writes for a blog or two, but there's nothing in this article or its references to suggest that she has any particular notability. Suggest a merge to Choose Love, the charity founded by the subject. Flip Format (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Women, Radio, Television, and United Kingdom. Flip Format (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the charity seems like a fine option, otherwise coverage is celebrity fluff articles. Oaktree b (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Oaktree, this is Lliana...s i prepare for the publication of my second book and have been asked by various publications interviewing me to share my wikipedia page and i was a little saddened to see that my page had been deleted, and that all i had worked so hard for had been seemingly erased and reduced to "celebrity fluff". I have to defend this, but what was discussed felt reductive of my achievements and life's work...

I hold the honour of being the longest standing female DJ on Xfm/ Radio X (one of the most known/loved stations in the UK). I was on air on this station every week, twice weekly, nationally for over 16 years. I was the first female DJ to hold the post for longer than a decade. I was the last ever DJ to close the much beloved Xfm, as it ended before its relaunch as Radio X.

I have published a science book (under Little Brown/ Hatchet) and am now preparing my second book to be published under Rocket Bird (part of Harper Collins) this Autumn.

I co-founded Choose Love, which is today the largest grassroots charity working with refugees. Through this work i have been the recipient of numerous prestigious awards, including Liberty's Jo Cox Award.

I was named as Foreign Policy's top 100 thinkers. I was named as one of NESTA's New Radicals.

I was invited to host the London Peace talks as a result of my work, and have toured the country speaking out about my work, both in activism and in film.

I have written and directed my own short films, including 'Snapshots' which one 6 awards at film festivals.

I created and hosted two podcasts, one of which won several awards.

I have been interviewed across the press about my work, and appeared on the front cover of The Observer magazine (The New Review).

It is fine if you think this work does not make me notable enough for a wikipedia page, however i find the insinuation that my life's work is "celebrity fluff" hard to accept. 82.3.12.222 (talk) 11:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Choose Love. The merge could be a problem because of the lack of IS RS in this article. If any new content can be properly sourced, no objection to merging that, but improperly sourced BLP content should not be merged. // Timothy :: talk 03:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flip Format, as i prepare for the publication of my second book and have been asked by various publications interviewing me to share my wikipedia page i was a little saddened to see that you had requested my page be deleted. More so that the reason you suggest is that i as just the partner of someone famous, and have not done much myself. I did not set up my wikipedia page, and so feel sad i have to defend this, but what you have stated feels somewhat reductive of my achievements...

I was the longest standing female DJ on Xfm/ Radio X (one of the most known/loved stations in the UK). I was on air on this station every week, twice weekly, nationally for over 16 years. I was the first female DJ to hold the post for over a decade. I was the last ever DJ to close the much beloved Xfm, as it ended before its relaunch as Radio X.

I have published a science book (under Little Brown/ Hatchet) and am now preparing my second book to be published under Rocket Bird (part of Harper Collins) this Autumn.

I co-founded Choose Love, which is today the largest grassroots charity working with refugees. Through this work i have been the recipient of numerous prestigious awards, including Liberty's Jo Cox Award.

I was named as Foreign Policy's top 100 thinkers. I was named as one of NESTA's New Radicals.

I was invited to host the London Peace talks as a result of my work, and have toured the country speaking out about my work, both in activism and in film.

I have written and directed my own short films, including 'Snapshots' which one 6 awards at film festivals.

I created and hosted two podcasts, one of which won several awards.

I have been interviewed across the press about my work, and appeared on the front cover of The Observer magazine (The New Review).

It is fine if you think this work does not make me notable enough for a wikipedia page, however i find the implication that i am just someone's partner, and that i have done "a few radio shows" quite insulting, and even a little misogynistic.

I would ask that perhaps you reconsider. Llianabird (talk) 13:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]