User talk:RopeTricks

Hello, RopeTricks, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bakilas (talk) 11:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Yeah, fair call to revert me. I wasn't sure if it made it better. I would normally post stuff like that on the talk page, but you can't really let people know exactly how you plan to change it, without actually doing it. Thought it would be best just to edit the page and see what people thought. No worries. Nate Hooper (talk) 11:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkish-backed Free Syrian Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Union Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2018), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

such as you did at National Statuary Hall Collection it is customary to include a reference. Fortunately it is not too late. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RopeTricks. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Artillery battery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to French and Iraqi

Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (September–December 2018) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to French

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Libyan Civil War (2014–present) into 2010s. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RopeTricks, now that we're well into September, and the Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (May–August 2019) page has been updated, we're in need of a new page for the September-December period, since you made the last page I figured I'd ask if you'd make the new one. 16:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.141.79.8 (talk)

I and someone else tried. It keeps getting deleted. RopeTricks (talk) 00:55, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (September–December 2019), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barisha raid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see 2023, rather than 2025? Am I missing something? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 13:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The 13 European member countries act as partners in the construction and operation of ESS.[4] ESS will start the scientific user programme in 2023, and the construction phase will be complete by 2025." You're right, the program begins in 2023, the Construction doesn't end until 2025. My mistake, I misread, I'll move it. RopeTricks (talk) 14:29, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I would appreciate it if you could refraining from calling it that. I simply don't believe we need that many links in a single sentence, paragraph, or section. If our readers are interested in any of those topics or people, they can look them up themselves. The links I removed are not particularly obscure. Nerd271 (talk) 06:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, it is disruptive. You continue to repeatedly remove internal links that only serve to help readers of a global audience. Honest editors should not assume readers of a global audience will know what "Mossad" is, for example. It is bizarre to mention George W. Bush and Barack Obama in an article not about them, without at the very least linking to their pages. The links are not excessive or "distracting". RopeTricks (talk) 06:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I have a higher opinion of our readers. They are on the Internet, after all. Unless the name or term is particularly obscure, there is no need for an internal link. Furthermore, Wikipedia is not a link depository. Think about the people on a mobile phone. They can't just hover the cursor over the links just to get a preview. We should do our readers a favor by keeping our pages clean. Nerd271 (talk) 06:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I think it is simply courteous to at least leave 1 (one) link to specific names of organizations or individuals that are mentioned for the sake of easy navigation for inquiring readers. Most of what you removed was not overlinked or cluttered. RopeTricks (talk) 06:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You made me re-read what you wrote there. Ha! But if you like your internal links, for the goodness sake, please don't put links that already exist. Do we need another one for Qasem Soleimani or drone strike?

Yeah, I'm kind of sleep deprived and forgot to put "not". I get your point and respect it and I have attempted to compromise by trimming the section, while re-adding only some links. Just once. I agree in principle it's not necessary to link twice if the terms are close together. RopeTricks (talk) 06:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in that case I hope you get some sleep soon. Thank you for your understanding and compromise. Nerd271 (talk) 06:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, mate. RopeTricks (talk) 06:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in a comment which I posted to that page on 10 Jan, and which I just revised. Ubzerver (talk) 09:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You make good points and I agree RopeTricks (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The title discussion is still open. If you like my idea of changing "attack" to "attacks," perhaps you could post a brief, second comment to that effect. Ubzerver (talk) 08:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please include dates of millions of other diseases that happened in the US over the pas 1000 years. What was the first case ever of Malaria in US that killed 100 million + over the world? why on Earth isn't that listed in which ever year it had happened? What makes the Wuhan coronavirus more significant than new diseases that are reported almost every year? It happening on the US for the first time is strictly a domestic event. Surely we can report millions of diseases from nearly 200 of countries in all the year articles separately. Hepatitis C which is far more signnificant thann this new disease was discovered in 1989, it is not listed on 1989, let alone mentioning the first case of it on the US. What makes your new disease more relevant than diseases with millions of death? Dilbaggg (talk) 09:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. is not even a 1,000 years old. Anyway, it's relevant because exactly that, it's a new disease. It's far too soon to determine if this disease outbreak will not be consequential on a world stage. It would be improper to just pretend that this new virus strain outbreak that has spread across oceans within just a couple weeks is not occurring and somehow not notable, based on dubious reasoning such as "but there's other viruses too!". Even if this disease was adequately contained in coming weeks and months, it is still worth noting that this new strain of this virus spread so quickly to the U.S. specifically. If you'd like to go back and mention Hep C and Malaria in their respective year articles, no one's stopping you from trying. RopeTricks (talk) 09:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly it is "far too soon". It is not the first new disease, nor will be the last new disease, they come and go every now and then. We must wait and see if it has as much impact as malaria and hepatitis c. But yeah i don't wanna edit war over minor stuffs like these so lets keep it, but please don't go adding countless new diseases that are to emerge just because they have happens in the US for the first time. It is after all a wikipedia article not a day by day news coverage article. Check the 2005 article it doesn't mention the bird flu pandemic and the Indian flood which killed 1ooos of people that year, the latter because at that time there was a wikipedia recent year policy domestic events cannot be added. January 2020 has almost the same amount of content as the entire 2005 year, as do all years since 2018 when the recent year article policy was lifted. 2020 will be the most eventful year ever (only according to wikipedia) if users keep adding everything as though its a day by day news coverage website as they have been doing sine the recent years policy was lifted. Dilbaggg (talk) 12:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Hello please see my comment at Talk:Northwestern Syria offensive (December 2019–March 2020)#Maarat Muqqas and al Burayj recaptured by regime on 12 March and consider adding it to the article.

Maarat Muqqas and al-Burayi/Burayj have been recaptured ny regime as as of March 12 after they earlier captured and lost them on 8 March. This time the regime hasn't been reported to lose them however. Hopefully you will add their second (and seemingly permanent for atleast now) capture. 117.199.87.61 (talk) 04:48, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish MoD announces deaths of two Turkish soldiers and another being injured in rocket attacks by radical groups. [1] 117.199.83.71 (talk) 23:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You dont have to leave messages on my talk page about what edits you want. If you have good sources, you can simply add the information yourself. I will not do anymore requests of this nature. RopeTricks (talk) 02:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RopeTricks. You've made a few edits now to this wording on the article on George Floyd Protests. Please discuss this in the relevant talk section here as a number of us have voiced our view against this wording, and there is currently no argument in support of it. I feel it would be good to build consensus on this to avoid edit-warring. Thanks.Wikiditm (talk) 11:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Floyd protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antifa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, George Floyd protests, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 04:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir/Ma’am I would like to have a chance to talk to you about the Boogaloo Movement, and some of what I believe is misinformation on their description. As well as misinformation I have read on other articles associated with them such as the George Floyd article. The biggest such piece of misinformation I believe is their designation of far right. The Movement encompasses the whole Left Right spectrum of the political compass, it’s only real requirement is that you are in the Libertarian quadrant and not the Authoritarian quadrant. The boogaloo marches with BLM, Antifa, and another person who is tired of Tyranny, and disassociates itself from white nationalism, in fact is made up of every race, creed, and orientation. I would very much like to talk with you about this, or find out who is responsible for the page.

Thank you for your time. DocShortBus99 (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I personally think that the so-called "Boogaloo movement" - I've seen some people debate whether its really even a "movement" of any force and not just a creation by media "journalists" to easily label a group of people on the internet they don't fully comprehend, a "ghost" movement of sorts - is more amorphous than wikipedia's article on the topic (which, like articles on most contemporary politics, is shaped and molded by whatever cited news media sources editors personally prefer) seems to portray. They seem to, at most, collectively skew to the political right, at most. I have no idea who created the article. RopeTricks (talk) 06:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were the last one to edit the page, that is why I reached out to you. There are other articles I have see with you associated on editing that also mention them as Far-Right. This couldn’t be farther from the truth, though there are bad actors like in every loose organization, this is a Left right libertarian movement. They weed out white nationalists, and try to be as exclusive as possible. There are members of Antifa and BLM that are part of the movement. I can attest it truly is a movement, built solely on social unrest, with hope for a change to our way of governance. The fact that they are militant, doesn’t Mean they want a civil war of blood shed, just that they are ready for it if it comes to that. Nobody wants to fight their neighbor, as nobody wins at that point. The media, all media, either misunderstands what they are, or wishes to paint them in a bad light for purposes of division. I simply am reaching out to someone who has the ability to edit the page. DocShortBus99 (talk) 12:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from various copyright news sources. Please see my edit summaries for specific urls. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outside of the direct quote from the official police report, most of it was paraphrased and rewritten by me from the source, if that's considered a violation of copyright then so be it. I spent too much of my time transplanting that information from the source, only to have it be removed for a reason I do not believe applies. I'm not adding it back. Have a good day. RopeTricks (talk) 07:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two of your additions were flagged by a bot as a potential copyright issue and was assessed by myself. First bot report, second bot report. Click on the iThenticate links to view what the bot found.— Diannaa (talk) 11:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Your explanation is clearly the best and most convincing. I am the original nominator for AFD but your explanation is the reason for me changing my vote. Feel free to non-administrative close it.

Others "keep" reasons were not as clearly written as yours. Vowvo (talk) 23:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that. Glad we can come to an understanding. RopeTricks (talk) 00:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RopeTricks! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at American-led intervention in the Syrian civil war that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --Renat 21:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brinkmanship&diff=1007965447&oldid=1007948918

there were no linked articles, you just added them now, the sentence was previously unsupported by sources

previously you asked here "Again, Why did it expand? Because talks collapsed. Why did you remove this?" when I previously explained that here and gave you a NYT link to prove it

soibangla (talk) 01:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When I said "Linked articles" i was referring to the peace process wikipedia page that was already wiki-linked/piped in the subsection, not cited news articles. I assumed you knew what "linked articles" was supposed to mean, as I use the term "article" to refer to wikipages as well. But that's my mistake for assuming and not making that clear. RopeTricks (talk) 01:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You needed sources, which you added after the fact. soibangla (talk) 01:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Movies are released every year and movies are newsworthy. Arek333 (talk) 01:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What? RopeTricks (talk) 01:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black sitcom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minstrelsy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move request now on Talk:2021 evacuation from Afghanistan. --WR 16:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for all your work on the Syria articles BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! RopeTricks (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for your help and suggestions on the article. Tepkunset (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! RopeTricks (talk) 08:36, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–2022 Persian Gulf crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South African.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American-led intervention in Iraq (2014–2021), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katyusha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello. Can you write this article in English and improve it and add more sections? The Russian Wikipedia is biased against Chechens and their struggle for freedom from Russia, articles are deleted. If this article were available in other Wikipedia sections and in other languages, it would be left in the Russian Wikipedia. https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B6%D0%B0%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%8B_%D0%B2_%D0%A1%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8 25let (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Current Events Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! RopeTricks (talk) 00:36, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This diff [2] is pretty much ripped straight from the source ([3]). I know this is an old edit by this point, but I only just noticed, and that paragraph had still been live until I integrated it just a few mins ago. Please be more careful with sources (i.e. put it into your own words). Curbon7 (talk) 05:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Battle of Donbas (2022–present), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert the updates on the article Deir ez-Zor clashes (2023) wthout an explanation? CatmanBw (talk) 02:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Chasiv Yar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dug-out.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi RopeTricks! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]