Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 June 10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sound Recorder 31.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Spunker88 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8 as a duplicative screenshot of an older version of the program when a screenshot of a newer version is already on the page. RJaguar3 | u | t 00:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I see no violation of WP:NFCC#3 (no another screenshot of Sound Recorder from Windows 3.1 on Sound Recorder page. No breach of WP:NFCC#8, as the image significantly improves the article by providing showing the early version of this long-standing piece of software. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 16:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:NFCC#3a refers to the non-free content in the entire article: "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." Thus, the NFCC#3a issue is not whether there is another screenshot of the same version, but whether there is another non-free screenshot on the Sound Recorder article. Further, I doubt WP:NFCC#8 justifies the usage of the non-free image of the old version; there are no sources in the article specifically describing the Windows 3.1 version. Since there are no reliable sources in the article describing the Windows 3.1 interface, the image of an old version fails contextual significance. RJaguar3 | u | t 13:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • The significant information in these screenshots is look and feel of the software in question. The Vista image alone is not sufficient, because it says nothing about the way this software looked in 10 years of its existance before Vista was released. Major overhaul in its visual design mandates two illustrations, and this file seems to be good fit for one of them. Both criteria you've mentioned allow it. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 23:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2001 Zambian elections results.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fngosa (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image is just the table in page 86 of the PDF from the Zambian Electoral Commission website. Data like this needs to be cited properly using citation templates rather than using screenshots. Green Giant (talk) 00:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Green Giant (talk) 00:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007 Worldsbest Cities.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Moebiusuibeom-en (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No source is given for this table which is used to illustrate a point on an article instead of using citation templates and stating where the information came from. Green Giant (talk) 00:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:AVGN Movie Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cowik (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8: poster for non-notable side product. Stefan2 (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Tomb Raider Trilogy cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dell9300 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8: product cover only used outside the article for the product. Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Usher Climax screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dan56 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

NFCC#8 violation Stevie (talk) 21:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.