Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 June 11

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:SecretCountryProjectNiueFlag.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DavidBatesonFan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There is not a clear PD release on source site listed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:HKundersecretaries1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ohconfucius (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 in the article that it is used in. It could be replaced by any image of the 24 newly appointed undersecretaries/assistants and the image itself is not discussed in the article, therefore lacking critical commentary. TLSuda (talk) 02:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• It's clearly a historical image – first appointments under a new system which is the subject of the article in question. Certainly there are other agency images out there, but there are no free ones in existence – if we can't use this one, we can't use any of the others. While the image itself isn't discussed in critical commentary, all the individuals are. This is equivalent to cast images that are allowed to be used under FU rationale in articles about television series, but it's already of such a low resolution that it's nigh impossible to distinguish the individuals' faces, so it's of no commercial value. In any event, the cabinet composition changed within weeks, so there's no question of there being this group of people together in a photograph again. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 02:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Even if its not replaceable (which I disagree) it still must meet all of WP:NFCC#8 including there must be critical commentary. Currently, the image is solely being used for identification of the first group (not the only group) and therefore is not necessary to the understanding of the article at all. TLSuda (talk) 02:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will take you up on that, and would be most grateful if you could find me a free one to replace this image. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 04:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For WP:NFCC#1, you don't have to find one or have one readily availabe, one just has to be able to be created. And since it is used purely for identification, there are many other types of photos that could be used instead for identification. TLSuda (talk) 14:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete:

1. Per WP:NFCC#1: Replaceable by a photograph of different undersecretaries and political assistants.
2. Per WP:NFCC#8: Not critically discussed and doesn't assist in the understanding of the article in any way. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nancykissel.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ohconfucius (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image fails WP:NFC#UUI#7 as it is a press agency photo (AP) where the photo itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. Therefore the image fails WP:NFCC#2 and vaguely WP:NFCC#8 TLSuda (talk) 02:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sqid drying - Twillingate.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by John Hill (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is a darker, near duplicate of File:Squid drying - Twillingate.jpg, there is no need for both images, and this one is unused. TLSuda (talk) 02:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ProEvents Group logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PEM816 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopedic, I uploaded it in order to use in the page I would like to contribute, but so far my page didn't get approval, so it's useless now. The owner of this logo requested us to remove it. Pem816 (talk) 04:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:L 466c5a350099becf767c9f1f4cde6391.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ookie Panda (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

User fan art based apparently based on an image used on an [pokemongirlsworl.forum community.net/?t=42443878 online forum]. Used only on users own userpage and falls outside Commons scope because it is user artwork. Commons does allow a small number of images of users themselves but this is clearly not the user. Green Giant (talk) 09:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ookiechibi.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ookie Panda (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

User fan art based apparently based on their avatar at deviantart.com. It is used on only on their own userpage and falls outside Commons scope because it is user artwork. Commons does allow a small number of images of users themselves but this is clearly not the user. Green Giant (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ookie.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ookie Panda (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

User fan art based apparently based on their profile at rpgmakervx.net. It is used on only on their own userpage and falls outside Commons scope because it is user artwork. Commons does allow a small number of images of users themselves but this is clearly not the user. Green Giant (talk) 09:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:L 5ca5a71d46ac4195b4a6d68343af33f5.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Preston.pittman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This personal photo has been hosted here for more than 6 years by a user who has made no contributions to the encyclopedia other than writing about themselves. This image is not suitable for Commons for the same reasons. Green Giant (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:L 918ac6158b6fbe73788e521fd6f0608b.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bzqtmg (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused photo with questionable encylcopedic value and questionable Commons value. There are better pictures of slim-fit pants and of women's rears. Green Giant (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:L 92b2ae5d236e78038c9aeab4bd7d91b3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fully kebab (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Photo created by a minor at the time of uploading. The users two main contributions were writing about themselves and rumours about thier school computer system. No edits since August 2007. This photo is unsuitable for Commons for the same reasons. Green Giant (talk) 10:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artofcricketcd-rom.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Moondyne (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8: cover of non-notable side product. Stefan2 (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:L e03833608d2b8b3ba5d8000174f78583.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hennesy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The user image has been stuck on to an existing image of Machu Pichu, which I suspect was this one or a similar image. Without details of the copyright status and author of the background image it is unacceptable for Commons. On Wikipedia it is used solely for a userpage, although the user has not edited for more than six years. Green Giant (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:L e5f0d989595d67debe486baa1b850ae6.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Riggy0520 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Promotional poster (possibly user art) for a non-notable film from a non-notable studio which has only a Facebook page, possibly even a hoax. Only being used for the uploaders userpage; uploader has made no other significant edits apart from userpage. Unsuitable for Commons for the same reasons. Green Giant (talk) 12:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014JEGSDart.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cred05 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Also fails WP:NFCC#1, a free image of this car could be created. January (talk) 16:52, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Image fails WP:NFCC#8. The additional content is not sourced. The only part of the article about this piece that is sourced is a quote from the website describing the dress. TLSuda (talk) 02:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lycett green 1968 suit.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Edwardx (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. An example of a fashion designer's work seems essential to understanding the article topic. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • However, there is no discussion about this photo of the designer's work, so the photo of the design fails WP:NFCC#8. It also fails WP:NFCC#1 as a different photograph easily could be created. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • There is discussion: "The 1968 suit shown here is a good example of Lycett Green's work for Blades, and was made from Lyon brocaded silk itself made in 1953. It was worn by Lycett Green himself and given to the Victoria and Albert Museum by him, where it appears in their fashion gallery." and a ref. No, a free one can't be created because the suit is not on display. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • WP:NFCC only allows you to use non-free images to support the text. In this case, it is instead the text which supports the image. You got it the wrong way around. The section discusses clothes produced by this guy in general, so any piece of clothing produced by him would provide as good understanding as any other piece of clothing. Also, it says that this particular piece of clothing was "given to the Victoria and Albert Museum by him, where it appears in their fashion gallery", so all you need to do is to visit "their fashion gallery" with a camera. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        • I am there tomorrow. I will see whether it is in fact on display. I assume this discussion will stay open until tomorrow evening? Philafrenzy (talk) 14:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
          • I've expanded the text about this particular suit. Hope that helps. Edwardx (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        • I visited the V & A today. As I thought, it is not on display. The display in Room 40 has been changed to ladies fashion and wedding dresses. I asked a member of staff when the suit would be back on display (if ever) but they had no idea, so it is not possible to take our own photograph. I will continue to monitor that room but until the suit comes back, which could be years if ever, I think this is valid fair use. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Midnight Sun album cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MarkoDbello (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Claude-Jean Allouez.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Redsky89 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails either WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#8 if unfree as claimed. Claude-Jean Allouez, the subject of the image, died in 1689, so a modern copyrighted picture either has to be based on pure speculation, or on a contemporary image.

If this is based on a contemporary image, then it violates WP:NFCC#1 as the contemporary image could be used instead.

If this is based on pure speculation, then it violates WP:NFCC#8 as the picture doesn't say anything about what the person looked like. Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep because it is the only known image we can find of him. Redsky89 (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is not how WP:NFCC works. If it is based on a public domain image, then WP:NFCC#1 requires you to locate that public domain image and use that instead. If the image is pure speculation, then WP:NFCC#8 tells that we can't use this image, since pure speculation provides absolutely no information about what he looked like. If there is no contemporary public domain image of the person, then WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 tell us that the article would work equally well with no image at all. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Terrapholus Sumatra.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ebaychatter0 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:WFLD Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mrschimpf (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC#8: former logo without critical discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Uploader-supported deletion, no real use in article at this point. Nate • (chatter) 16:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mother Tucker (Modern Family).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TeamGale (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:WrestlePalooza98.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TJ Spyke (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFLISTS. Stefan2 (talk) 16:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ladidah Wallpaper.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chinda55 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused personal file designed more for uploaders website, FB and Twitter accounts. Was used for a an AfC draft but that was turned down. No other edits made by uploader. Unsuitable for Commons because it doesn't have much educational use. Green Giant (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Nick-D (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trooper Donaldson being awarded VC fair use claimed.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nick-D (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• At User talk:Russavia#Message for Stefan2, User:Russavia suggests that this image should be replaced by another image. The user also suggests that another image in the article Mark Donaldson violates WP:NFCC and should be replaced by another free image. I agree with Russavia about this, but I do not know if replacing images in the article or nominating the other one for deletion would be considered as proxy editing on behalf of a blocked user. Opinions? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (as uploader) I disagree with Russavia's view that the use of this image was never compliant with the fair use criteria (it depicts the moment the first-ever award of Australia's highest military medal was made). However, as the Governor General's website has subsequently released all its images, including a couple from this ceremony, under Wikipedia-friendly licenses the fair use claim is no longer tenable or sensible and it's time for this to be deleted. Nick-D (talk) 10:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • As this image is now unused I've speedy deleted it - thanks again Stefan for the notification. Nick-D (talk) 23:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.