Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Amateur Body Building Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:21, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

World Amateur Body Building Association

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see how this meets our new and improved notability requirements for organisations. The article is sourced only to the website of the organisation. It gets a number of passing mentions on GNews and a few on GBooks, but I don't see any of the sort of in-depth coverage that would justify an article – or, indeed, enable us to write one. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:01, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The criteria for WP:NCORP are strict and specific: a subject must require in-depth coverage from multiple reliable sources, which are clearly independent of the subject. I don't think that this article meets those criteria, and a WP:BEFORE search doesn't yield anything that would make it meet them.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:43, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.