Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tennyson Whiting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tennyson Whiting

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. Couldn't find many sources on this player whatsoever, and he hasn't had any success on the major circuits of professional tennis Adamtt9 (talk) 23:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly fails NTENNIS and only receives minor coverage in the likes of Edwardsville Intelligencer. I found this tiny article about his unconventional racket but not enough for GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Maybe 900 ranking spots below notability? Geschichte (talk) 06:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Local sources only mention Whiting by name for game/ranking announcements (e.g. [1], [2], [3] and [4]). There is no in-depth coverage of this player. Fails WP:SIGCOV and therefore fails WP:GNG. Heartmusic678 (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.