User talk:Eastmain

Archives

Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 4. Archive 5. Archive 6. Archive 7. Archive 8. Archive 9. Archive 10. Archive 11. Archive 12. Archive 13. Archive 14. Archive 15. Archive 16. Archive 17.

Hi, Eastmain, I saw that you declined the A7 speedy tag I had placed on this article, which is of course your prerogative. I'm considering taking it to AfD now that the speedy's been declined, but I wanted to get your perspective on it first. You say the sourcing is "adequate", but I really don't agree; the only two sources cited are a) the company's own website and b) a puff piece in a school newspaper that is talking about how the local branch is no longer a part of the brand in question. This doesn't feel like adequate sourcing to me at all, and I was wondering what your take on it was. Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 03:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @Writ Keeper: When an article has been around for a long time, speedy for lack of notability is generally inappropriate. I would avoid using the term "puff piece". I found these additional references: "Bookstores in Malaysia reinventing themselves with lifestyle offerings". The Business Times. Retrieved 2023-05-19. and "New Reading Experience at Times Bookstores New Lifestyle Concept Store at KL Gateway Mall". Pamper.My. 2017-04-10. Retrieved 2023-05-19. . Sometimes when you are looking for references about a topic located in a smaller country, it helps to narrow the search by including "site:my" or "site:sg" in your search, or by sincluding the country's full name. So you could search for

"Times Bookstores" or
"Times Bookstores" Singapore

When the company uses different versions of its name, you should search for both "Times Bookstore" and "Times Bookstores". Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When an article has been around for a long time, speedy for lack of notability is generally inappropriate--this is certainly not policy, and I don't agree with it on principle, either; articles don't get a pass just because they snuck below the radar and nobody has looked at them for years. And I would not avoid using the term "puff piece", because it was a puff piece, written by a media relations team, not a journalist. Nor do I think "pamper.my" is a valid source; it looks like an ad. The Business Times article is...better; I have some doubts, but I'll not get into it further. Thanks for responding. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 12:50, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Three Little Fish and the Big Bad Shark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heinemann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) .

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Davenant Foundation School Badge Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jennifer Jajeh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kykkelsrud hydroelectric power station. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly heads-up in case you weren't already aware, since it's installed on your common.js: Careless use of ReferenceExpander has caused serious problems. It's currently at MFD, and a large cleanup project is underway to repair the citations damaged by the script. I and several other users have !voted that the script be deleted or disabled, and I wouldn't recommend using it at all unless you thoroughly check every reference it modifies against the previous revision. If you're interested in a more detailed explanation of the script's issues, Folly Mox has provided an excellent summary at the MFD. — SamX [talk · contribs] 05:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @SamX: Thank you. I have responded there. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - For article Canadian Passenger Association created 5 August 2014‎, today I added Missing information tag & asking if you would like to help improve with more content? Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khulna Shipyard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khulna Shipyard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.parvage (talk) 08:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eastmain,

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

The article Nhlanhla "Lux" Dlamini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability per WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 01:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Donnell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Donnell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jps (talk) 12:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I think your goal of trying to rescue as many articles from deletion as possible is an admirable one, and in many cases I would take the same view. I've put a lot of effort into improving many articles on Wikipedia in my time, however I don't believe your actions on Intervision Song Contest 1977 are helpful. Removing a PROD without any appropriate feedback and adding three completely unrelated references from the corresponding Russian-language article without even considering how they relate to this article does not help to improve it. The first two references you added do not even contain reference to the Intervision Song Contest at all, but instead the Sopot International Song Festival, which is a different event entirely which Intervision was held alongside between 1977 and 1980. Indeed even the first one falls down on WP:SELFPUB since it comes from a personal website. The third reference, although it is about the 1980 contest, does not provide any relevance to the 1977 contest, and is included in the Russian language article to provide an example of how the format of the contest changed. I have no doubt that the Intervision Song Contest as a whole is notable enough and has significant coverage to warrant its own article, however that is not the article in question which I PRODded. I still don't believe that a standalone article for one edition of the contest when very reliable information about it is available online should continue to be hosted here when any relevant coverage can (and already is) hosted on the parent article. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 14:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sims2aholic8: Since the event took place in 1977, it helps to consider whether an event sponsored by many national broadcasters would have received coverage from reliable sources, based on everything we know about Warsaw Pact societies. My interpretation is that covering the contest would have allowed media in those countries to fill their "good news" quota, and this would continue to be true until the collapse of the Soviet Union. Anyway, I see you've taken the article to AfD. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eastmain,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Karakhanid-Samanid war, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harold Cox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swami Vivekanand International School and Junior College, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekanand International School and Junior College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you placing references in section headings? References should be placed at the end of the content that they support, and per WP:CITEFOOT: Citations should not be placed within, or on the same line as, section headings. Schazjmd (talk) 16:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	Thanks for adding references to Seonbu station and related articles discussed together at AfD! Actualcpscm (talk) 18:33, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jamie Lim, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adrienne C. Nelson High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 00:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eastmain. It's admirable that you want to save drafts from G11, but I would like to know why you removed a valid tag from a promo piece almost certainly generated by an LLM without changing the offending content. Thanks, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 09:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the promo tags per your rewrite of the article. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 14:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'm curious as to why you removed a G11 tag on Draft:Sashidhar Jagdishan. The page reads very strongly like UPE spam, and has almost no meaningful content worth keeping (were it to be rewritten). Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 14:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See above, you're not the only one wondering. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Giraffer:, @Schminnte: The CEO of a bank is very likely to be notable. Style issues can be fixed by means other than deletion. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but unambiguous promotion is not a style issue. Perceived notability has nothing to do with whether a page is an obvious advertisement, which should be deleted per G11. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 10:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Giraffer and Schminnte: I have cleaned up the article from most of the puffery. I am fairly sure the article should both be CSD-proof and notable enough to be in namespace, but to be safe, I will not move it to namespace myself.

I will also note that almost all the sentences remaining in the article have been taken from the puffed up article from before, so clearly it did have meaningful content worth keeping. Soni (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Soni, to be clear I was talking about the draft mentioned in the section above. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 13:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. I couldn't tell from your reply above here if you were also discussing this article. Soni (talk) 13:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hai! InternetArchiveBot run #14741 (submitted by you) seems to be going very wonky - it says it's run through the full list of pages, but apparently hasn't realized that it needs to finish the job and release its bot worker for other use. Could you maybe try manually killing the job and see if that clears up the issue? Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 04:39, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Whoop whoop pull up: Thank you. I killed the job, as you suggested. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'Nother heads-up, this time regarding job #14754. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 14:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aaaaand job #14756 as well. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 18:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Whoop whoop pull up Thank you. Also fixed. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's me again, bringing word of job #14774. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 14:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Whoop whoop pull up Also fixed. Thanks. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Y'welks! :-) Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 19:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hai again - jobs #14821 and #14823 this time. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 12:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also fixed. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:41, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Back again, this time regarding job #14845. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 13:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for taking care of 14845! Unfortunately, job #14849's now stuck. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 19:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heads-up regarding job #14874. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 21:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also fixed. Thanks for the heads-up. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Y'welks! Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 00:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Job #14882 this time. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 11:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also killed. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now it's job #14884. (Wonder why it keeps jamming on your runs when I haven't run into that sort of problem at all; the bot must not like you very much! 😛) Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 16:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also killed. All these instances of IAbot getting stuck make me feel sad. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can imagine! BTW, job #14889's having the same problem. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 02:53, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also killed. My job #14875 is still running. It's quite slow, but it is making progress. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:57, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Job #14892, on the other hand... Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 06:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 06:17, 2023-09-07 Eastmain killed bot job 14892 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's me yet again, this time regarding job #14903... Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 11:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Killed. Thanks for the note. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• #14918 Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 03:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks. # 09:19, 2023-09-09 Eastmain killed bot job 14918 (Job was stuck after running all 725 pages, still claimed to be running) Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:56, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• #14938 Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 20:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• #14940 Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 20:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Fixed. Thanks. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Y'welks Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 21:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• #14875 seems to've frozen; it hasn't progressed at all past item 1,671 in at least a day. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 16:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks. I killed it. I split the remaining pages from 14875 into halves, and submitted the two halves separately. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Paldiski North Harbour, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All statements need valid sources. The first source is used to verify the statement "Kett was born on March 11, 1938 in the United States". However, none of that information appears in the source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph F. Kett and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 16:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 16:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:ORGCRIT and WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JettWings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 05:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Steelton Village. Thanks! Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

Use the translation and then resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MS Sailor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLI 09:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NGEO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xotinariq and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Faxonius acares, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:32, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article 21 (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 11:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bird Island, Utah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 18:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This article requires major trimming; much of the content is purely unencyclopedic, original research fluff. I can scroll down for 3 seconds, and no longer understand what the article is talking about. The amount of content here should either be broken up into multiple articles, or refined & focused into the key points of the village in a suitably-sized encyclopedia entry. Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steelton Village and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see these links to an internet gaming link which a bot has introduced. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 16:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted them. -- Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 16:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

?? but when I inserted a raw link, e.g. It worked. ?? I'm leaving them dead for now. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 16:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ancheta Wis:

Thank you for catching this. The Fort Bliss Bugle has ceased publication, according to https://home.army.mil/bliss/about/news/final-bliss-newspaper-fort-bliss-bugle-ends-run-after-78-years Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indian Land High School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:58, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eastmain,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. Thank you for your work on Champigny, Quebec City. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turpentine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian turpentine tree.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dawn M. McBride and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 20:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clemson Island culture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kykkelsrud hydroelectric power station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eastmain:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1700 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reliance Industrial Infrastructure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Industrial Infrastructure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  17:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Land High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elise Finch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Xotinariq, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wasatch County School District and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eastmain, you helped me 6 years ago, perhaps you can help again! Psansoldo is changing the first sentence of the article "Learning by teaching": "I took away the reference to Jean-Pol Martin as a having originally defined the method, as other people, as Andrew Bell and Joseph Lancaster had already worked and used a similarly defined method before, as cited in the article itself." I think it's not usefull, because I'm the main autor about Learning by teaching since 1980 and everybody quoted my work if writing about "Learning by teaching". What do you mean? Jeanpol (talk) 12:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC) ChatGPT: ""Learning by Teaching" (or "Lernen durch Lehren" in German), as a formalized educational method, was developed by Jean-Pol Martin in the 1980s. Jean-Pol Martin is a German educator and professor who introduced this approach primarily for language teaching. His method emphasizes the role of students as active participants in the learning process, where they take on the role of teachers to instruct their peers. This approach has since gained popularity and has been adapted in various educational settings beyond language learning, due to its effectiveness in enhancing understanding, engagement, and the development of a range of skills in students." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanpol (talk • contribs) 12:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bishops Bridge station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There is nothing of substance here. The only secondary source is about a plant that happened to be found near the station, and this is a one sentence mention, nowhere near significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bishops Bridge station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Klein-Knight, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Donald E. Munson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Boris Alexander Krukoff indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abuta dwyerana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abuta fluminum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Abuta chocoensis. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abuta chocoensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey By billionaires I was referring to USD Billionaires only, not in Indian rupees. If you look at the sources, i have added forbes article link for all of them which shows their live networth. I have added their personal website links too for confirmation of their current position on the board of the company or too check their date of birth. Thank you KRFAAR (talk) 19:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Leratiomyces percevalii. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leratiomyces percevalii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eastmain,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Public adjusters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		Thank you so much for advocating for me on my talk page and for fixing my userspace drafts so that they weren't just external links!! You're the best. benǝʇᴉɯ 01:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eastmain. I knew the Draft:Nisarga Township didn't read promotional but the intent was obviously to promote their own project. I believe the township comes under KRS Nisarga Badavane and the realtor/ agent is trying to promote the sale of the houses/flats/land which comes under Nirman Group of Institutions. The user is clearly WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. But yeah, I don't think G11 applies though. Cheers Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Karin Vogel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. This is just a lazy Sunday story and was probably no longer true before it was written here,. The line of succession is always on the move as babies are born and existing people in line die.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   08:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Velella: Someone else removed the prod. I think she's still notable. Any babies born since 2011 would be above her in the line of succession, so she's still at the end. Once notable, always notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• If the Wall Street Journal writes about someone (particularly on another continent), the person is probably notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karin Vogel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karin Vogel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, could you delete my article that you moved to the Russian version of Wikipedia yesterday? I need to make a lot of edits and I need to change the title of the article. Приверженность (медицина) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_(%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0)_this_link

Thanks in advance -- Farouk soliman 11 (talk) 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Farouk soliman 11: I have tagged the article as {{db-author}}. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Do you know how much time need for this article to be deleted????!

  Thanks in advance for helping Farouk soliman 11 (talk) 13:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippe Eidel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indochine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xkalponik was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Habitant (food brand) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

X (talk) 08:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have modified the whole article, removing the primary sources, do you think is enough? Mcapdevila (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eastmain. Thank you for your work on Acton, New Brunswick. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Port of Coeymans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Eastmain,

Appreciate your message. I am new to editing on Wikipedia so please forgive my lack of knowledge on some topics. After thoroughly looking over Wikipedia's Content Policies article, I believe that this article from The Fader should meet Wikipedia's content policies. Note that this article written by the same author is used in the Wikipedia article for Quinn (musician). The other sources used on the profile are slightly more dubious, however I added the group's profile on NTS to hopefully bolster it's credibility.

Please let me know how I should proceed. Thanks so much for your help! (ComprehensiveGoat6 (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC));[reply]

• @ComprehensiveGoat6: I left comments on the draft. The article in The Fader helps to demonstrate notability, but at least one more in-depth reference from a reliable source is probably needed. I checked The Age, a daily mainstream newspaper from Melbourne, and didn't find anything. Is there a weekly entertainment newspaper published in Melbourne or elsewhere in Australia that might have covered the band? Also, I couldn't find the band's recordings at the National Library of Australia or the Library of Congress in the United States. This page explains what the band should do in order to deposit its recordings and videos at the National Library of Australia. To donate recordings and other material to the Library of Congress, fill out the form at https://www.loc.gov/acq/gifts/ so that the library can decide whether it wants the material. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 10:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article English Language School, Dubai, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English Language School, Dubai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page L'Express de Madagascar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Corma tamosi. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Corma tamosi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NegativeMP1 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This article, which would fall under WP:BLP if put into mainspace, has several unsourced sections and only really cites award ceremonies. There's no evidence this person is notable, and it'd violate BLP if it were in mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Borislav Slavov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

λ NegativeMP1 17:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F-16 Viper Demonstration Team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://m.imdb.com/name/nm4595885/ LuxuryUK72 (talk) 18:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^{[1] [2]} LuxuryUK72 (talk) 18:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LuxuryUK72: Those references from the UK Parliament and IMDB can be external links, but don't count as references. The parliamentary ones were created by an employee of the company, and anyone can edit IMDB. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://underlinesmagazine.com/2022/01/11/paint-the-town-red-with-harlette/ LuxuryUK72 (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting the references I've more not sure if these are any help

https://business.theeveningleader.com/theeveningleader/news/read/42402491/braconomics_harlette_capital_ltd_contribution_to_saudi_arabia_economy_$33bill_each_year_for_11_years

https://nextnewtech.com/news/braconomics-harlette-capital-ltd-contribution-to-saudi-arabia-economy-33bill-each-year-for-11-years/380483

https://thelingeriejournal.com/harlette-luxury-lingerie/

https://www.slated.com/people/61007/updates LuxuryUK72 (talk) 00:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've found this as well

http://www.extravaganzi.com/2012/08/09/harlette-luxury-lingerie-so-sexy-but-so-romantic/ LuxuryUK72 (talk) 01:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.justluxe.com/fine-living/fashion/feature-1808464.php

https://estylingerie.com/2017/03/11/7-brands-making-beautiful-luxury-robes/ LuxuryUK72 (talk) 01:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia-on-ipfs.org/wiki/Harlette LuxuryUK72 (talk) 01:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Girl Geeks Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SICSA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheryl Bazard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 11:54, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you moved the article for Zobe Records that I created to draft because it was missing citations. I just wanted to let you know that citations have been added and I have worked on the article more and I think it is ready for your review for inclusion. I'm new here so if you have an suggestions or want to add to the article it would be appreciated as I'm new and still learning and want to be a good editor here on the site. I appreciate your help. Thanks. Mixedmdman (talk) 22:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not going to revert you as I have started the AfD for that article, and messing with the contents may look wrong: but your edit here is totally incorrect. Not only is it absolutely clear from reading that "article" that it is extreme spam, the "author", Tedfuel, is a "PR & Digital Marketing Agency. Global PR Powerhouse."[1] and "the secret weapon for companies who want to establish credibility and authority quickly."[2]. Fram (talk) 13:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Government Engineering College Patan Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emmanuelle Tognoli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dagmar Triebel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Taos Tigers Logo Trimmed From Banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are routine coverage and/or publications by the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Consumers' Gas Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacques-Christophe Huguenet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Telangana Social Student Organization, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Clemson Island culture".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bishops Bridge station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SMK Lembah Subang, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMK Lembah Subang (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ongakukan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Friedrich Ludwig Diels indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 23:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]