Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swakopmund Skydiving Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Swakopmund Skydiving Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor club club, not established for a significant length of time, no achievements, no assertion of notability. All the article does (badly) is say "it exists". Biker Biker (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only found this which is routine news coverage of a skydiving accident. -- Whpq (talk) 14:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I cant honestly see why this article should be identified for deletion. The club has existed since 1974, is active, and very much an attraction in Swakopmund.Quadtripplea (talk) 12:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability is in question. Significant coverage in independent reliable sources need to be presented to show that general notability guidelines, or organisation-specific guidelines are met. -- Whpq (talk) 13:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.