Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suvodeep Chatterjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete/snow close. This was previously deleted and there is nothing really new here to go against the prior AfD, so I'm closing this early and speedying it as a recreation, plus a possible recreation by a blocked user. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suvodeep Chatterjee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Egregiously spammy (auto?)bio article, which fails (from what I can see) to net a single article in any bona fide WP:Reliable source. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the article creator is also attempting to create a WP:Walled garden of article such as Universal records forum -- now also at Afd -- in an attempt to bolster his notability for mouth-painting and what have you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:BLP1E appears to apply. reddogsix (talk) 16:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - all possible source is provided to support the article, if being a Limca Book of Records Unique World Records India Book of Records holder is not notable then delete those articles from wikipedia too. S chattopadhyay — Preceding undated comment added 16:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - considering all the sources and he is not only a world record holder, an artist too. it should be keept. many articles has less information than this but is still exist in wiki, like this one Sababbi Mangal . S chattopadhyay — Preceding undated comment added 16:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CommentThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this person is notable with remarkable achievements and it should be on the wikipedia for general public information about his inventions and publication that are more valuable for public and is useful too. S chattopadhyay — Preceding undated comment added 16:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ - I created this article because he is well-known in Kolkata,WP:BLP1E wont be applied for this, because he is not famous for one thing, he is an well known artist too from kolkata and he have records in many different categories.S chattopadhyay (talk)undated S chattopadhyay (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Second "keep" opinion from one user struck above. AllyD (talk) 16:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no WP:Reliable source - WP:BLP1E applies.Pincrete (talk) 17:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete This was previously nominated twice for AfD as Suvodeep chatterjee with Deletion consensus both times. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suvodeep chatterjee and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suvodeep chatterjee (2nd nomination). I would recommend salting.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:20, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to do just that, since it was previously speedied and since this is likely the same user trying to evade a block. The claims here are essentially the same, so there's nothing really new here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.