Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suvodeep chatterjee (2nd nomination)

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If you have a problem with this deletion please take it to deletion review. Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 02:45, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suvodeep chatterjee

AfDs for this article:
Suvodeep chatterjee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some guy who made a painting with his mouth. Two websites are cited, which both contain roughly the same info and can not be regarded as intellectually independent of each other. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - He may be notable if he really did set a world record, but the cited websites are of questionable reliability. Perhaps if someone with access to Indian sources can find a couple of newspaper articles, this bio could be saved. - MrX 19:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not notable. Agree with MrX. jni (talk) 20:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should not be Deleted He is really a world record holder and world record india and Record holder republic is a registered organization.World record holders are the pride of a country,who should be supported with respect, prosperity and honor by every country and every citizen as well.- user: Jeetbnr —Preceding undated comment added 22:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep i think now this discussion should be closed.His all the external links proving the notability of his own.And one artist who comes in news paper for his show and world records,he should be notable for wiki and his details should not be delete. (?) —Preceding undated comment added 10:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep after considering all the articles links.world records links,samsung winning link,news paper links..which proved he is notable. ( Jeetbnr (talk) 11:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC) )[reply]
  • Keep I've added news paper article and more details.A million hits on Google are not required to establish notability. The article is reliably sourced. Every article in the living persons category [10] is about people notable in their respective fields. This article has enough sources for a stub. However, a request for more sources can be made, deleting the article doesn't look particularly constructive ( Jeetbnr (talk) 12:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC) )[reply]
    As I mentioned on your talk page, adding multiple comments with keep in the front of them and repeating the same arguments are not likely to influence the outcome of this discussion. If fact, it seems a bit WP:DISRUPTIVE. - MrX 13:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep he is one of the pride of west bengal,His page should keep.,if he is non notable then thousand of pages in wiki is non notable.,even those pages dont have reliable sources.and all the references are genuine and he having 3 world records in art field.

( Souvik wb (talk) 13:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC) ) — Souvik wb (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]


Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Or I would open an investigation if there wasn't already one open Neonchameleon (talk) 16:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And the sockpuppets have been now blocked. Closing admin, please discount the multiple "keeps" from socks. jni (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • notable criteria

1.The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times. 2.The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.[7] 3.Creative professionals,The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition

all those mentioned pointed achieved by Suvodeep Chatterjee....according wikipedia notable clause everything is all right... Jeetbnr (talk) 13:06, 7 December 2013 (UTC) — Jeetbnr (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  • Comment - summing up In addition to the nominator, there have been four people taking part in this discussion so far. In chronological order: Mr, jni, user: Jeetbnr, and myself. Three of us have voted for deletion, with only Jeetbnr voting to keep the article. Every single one of the seven votes for keep (or "do not delete") on this page has been cast either by Jeetbnr when he was logged in (whether or not he signed his name to his votes to keep) or by sockpuppets of user: Jeetbnr which have subsequently been banned and for which he received a two day suspension from Wikipedia. In addition, a quick look at his contributions shows Jeetbnr to be a single purpose account on the subject of this page; as of now his only contributions are to the page on Suvodeep Chatterjee, the talk page there, to request undeletion of that page, and to this discussion. Neonchameleon (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment in addition to delete,people have to gives proper reason,and in terms of WIKIPEDIA notable clause,and condition i have proved that this article which i have written is correct..if any one having any problem,he can give proper reason..and wikipedia is independent,and i can work with any page,its Suvodeep chatterjee or any one else.its my own rights...this page is up for to give proper points regarding delete or keep.nothing else.According to Mr comment - "He may be notable if he really did set a world" record,and i proved that he set 3 world record..so i believe admin will read my each point and he will get the perfect logic..thank you all.. Jeetbnr (talk) 11:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)— Jeetbnr (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
    No, you have not proven that he set three world records, or even one. The world record for largest painting by mouth was set in 2007 by R.Rajendran [1]. MiraclesWorldRecords.com is not reliable. For one thing, they have only existed for a little over a year. They also hide their identity, an obvious concern when evaluating source reliability. rhrindianrecords.co.in was created in 2008, is is not much better. Notice how they obscure their address and phone number. worldrecordsindia.com is was created in 2011 and is owned by Target SEO. Perhaps Suvodeep Chatterjee really has set a world record, but unfortunately it does not seem that a reliable source has taken note of it. Wikipedia is independent, but privately owned. It's not a publishing platform like wordpress.org. It is an encyclopedia and only notable subjects can be included. - MrX 17:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Suvodeep_chatterjee_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1068839218"