Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Pattison

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 06:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Pattison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found this promotional climbing BLP whose refs were either all blogs (youtube and personal) or defunct trekking companies. Zero SIGCOV in either mainstream UK RS or in the main climbing media (per WP:NCLIMBER). The text is pretty promotional and mostly done by an IP who developed the BLP and then left (probably the subject). Can't see this lasting long-term in Wikipedia; he has definitely no notability as a "mountaineer" for WP Climbing. Aszx5000 (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The first source on the article is non-verifiable and looks like it may be an short interview for a newspaper, the second source barely mentions the subject by name, and the third mentions he climbed Matterhorn, is climbing Eiger, is a market researcher, and has climbed the tallest mountain on each continent. The Wiki article says he writes for the same local Newcastle newspaper, The Journal, that two of the sources are from. I can hardly find more about him. Nothing is in-depth and the WP:PROMOTION editing history on the article is significant. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 03:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:BLP. The person who loves reading (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.