Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oggy (Oggy and the Cockroaches)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oggy (Oggy and the Cockroaches)

Oggy (Oggy and the Cockroaches) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's simply not enough information here to warrant a unique article. My preference would have been to merge, but the entirety of the content here is original research consisting of personal observations like coloration inconsistencies, and changes to character design. Whatever we wish to say about Oggy is, at present, best suited for a short paragraph in the main article. In this edit at the main article, UltraMario64, stated that he had an intention to flesh out this article, but this article hasn't been touched in almost 2 weeks, is unsourced, and I think userfication will give Ultra the time he needs to bring it up to Wikipedia standards, if he is able to do so. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, I userfied this article over a year ago at the article creator's request. This article is better written than the version from last year, but it still lacks any cited information that would justify it standing alone as an article. I am almost to the point of saying, delete, redirect and salt. EricSerge (talk) 13:30, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can't find a list of characters, so deletion seems like the best choice. I would not be opposed to draftifying the article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Incubate Eric, I told you to INCUBATE the page, not userfy it. You userfied the page instead, which led to a minor edit war. So. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UltraMario64 (talkcontribs) 22:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
UltraMario64 - Incubation is no longer an option. See WP:INCUBATOR. This means either: improve now, move to draft/or userfy and improve, or delete. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eric, I added reliable sources and a construction template... — Preceding unsigned comment added by UltraMario64 (talkcontribs) 08:18, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.