Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Gargiulo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Most editors argue that Gargiulo meets WP:PERP due to widespread national coverage of the alleged crimes. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 11:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Gargiulo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:PERP - "A living person accused of a crime is presumed not guilty unless and until the contrary is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured". Subject of the article is not otherwise notable, the article is borderline prejudicial . Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 03:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - but keep the article handy in the background; he's likely going to be convicted of multiple murders, so we can undelete it later on. Or just hide the article from public view for now. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, muliple crimes. An accused serial killer. who has been in the news for a decade, drawn national attention, and whose trial is being discusses as having political impact in the debate over rescinding the death penalty.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:22, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • A sample of the coverage, and note that this page was created in 2011, when Gargiulo first drew wide attention:

Keep - the article is based on allegations as clearly stated and, thus, still achieves the minimum standard for the presumption of innocence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Five10mommy (talkcontribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge - This guy was relevant in the news not that long ago, he's definitely a high profile case as with other serial killers. I also remember Ashton Kutcher being involved in his case, I can't remember the reason why. However because this person has not been convicted yet, this article could be merged to have the title Hollywood Ripper, but I do believe this individual will have signficane later on. There is already plenty of articles on him like the ones that user:E.M.Gregory listed. YatesTucker00090 (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2019 (UTC)YatesTucker00090[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:08, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.