Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rampage killers (familicides in Americas)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Barkeep49 (talk) 04:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of rampage killers (familicides in Americas) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The criteria are arbitrary (6+ dead, and perpetrator isn't one of them).
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
- List of rampage killers (familicides in Africa) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of rampage killers (familicides in the United States) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of rampage killers (familicides in Asia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of rampage killers (familicides in China) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of rampage killers (familicides in Europe) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(There's also List of familicides, which is simply a redirect to List of rampage killers (familicides in Africa), but that's outside the scope of Afd.) Clarityfiend (talk) 20:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep all. The prefaces, maybe wrongly, say every familicide that meets the arbitrary criteria (6+ dead, and perpetrator isn't one of them) should be included. But they do not rule out other killings that meet the definition of a rampage. See also Spree killer and Mass murder. The definition of a rampage killer is sourced, and all the entries in the lists are also sourced. These are valid lists. Aymatth2 (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Merge all to List of familicides and only include familicide events that have an article or are notable enough to include one. Ajf773 (talk) 01:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- All of these mass murderers received considerable press coverage at the time, so are notable. Fair-sized articles like Wilhelm Brückner (murderer) could be developed using the sources, if anyone cared to do so. It would seem simpler to decide first to keep the lists, then discuss merging into a single article afterwards. The United States one has 120 entries and Europe has 130. The combined list may be rather unwieldy and would continue to grow. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep all I see blue links in some of these list making them valid. Ample coverage for this sort of thing, not just news, but studies done and textbooks published. Wouldn't all fit in one article. No sense in deleting entries of the list that don't have their own articles since that'd make the list incomplete. Dream Focus 05:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep all Per the above. --SalmanZ (talk) 12:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep all That the inclusion criteria might be better is not an argument for deletion. -- Millionsandbillions (talk) 19:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep all notable topic and WP:NEXIST in books, etc. Lightburst (talk) 22:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep all per Dream Focus NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 14:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.