Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Grand Slam champions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 13:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Grand Slam champions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think we really need another Grand Slam list. We already have List of Grand Slam women's singles champions, List of Grand Slam men's singles champions, List of Grand Slam mixed doubles champions, List of Grand Slam men's doubles champions, List of Grand Slam women's doubles champions, Chronological list of women's Grand Slam tennis champions, Chronological list of men's Grand Slam tennis champions, List of Open Era Grand Slam men's singles finals, List of Open Era Grand Slam women's singles finals, List of Grand Slam singles champions in Open Era with age of first title, List of Grand Slam and WTA Tour Tier I/Premier singles tennis champions, and more that I'm not even listing. There is nothing new here plus the title is wrong since it is not a list of grand slam champions, it's a list of grand slam tournament champions since June of 1968. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CFORK as the nominator has mentioned the content is covered already in numerous articles. Ajf773 (talk) 21:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article does not duplicate any existing material, so it is not a WP:CFORK. It presents the material in a very useful and easily accessible chart so that the reader can easily view both venue, type, and year for each champion, all in one article. Softlavender (talk) 04:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It does duplicate the existing material, namely Chronological list of women's Grand Slam tennis champions and Chronological list of men's Grand Slam tennis champions. The only supposedly added value is that it combines single and double titles in a single list. I don't think we need another fork, and the current set is already well bloated. No such user (talk) 11:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Duplicated content already in the multiple list examples given above. --Navops47 (talk) 03:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)-[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Too much of a good thing.--Wolbo (talk) 21:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.