Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamuna Boro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. SoWhy 15:42, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jamuna Boro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not comply BLP or WP:GNG. Run off the mill BLP. Moreover, by-passed AfC submission which was previously declined due to same reasons as patroller stated on the page. EROS ^message 04:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Passes WP:GNG with in-depth coverage from several reliable sources. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nominator. Does not pass WP:NBOX or WP:GNG.PRehse (talk) 09:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I read all the article,it doesn't pass(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 13:59, 26 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:28, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Several of the current sources are not reliable or are routine sports coverage, but subject passes WP:GNG based on the Telegraph article and a BBC Hindi article [1] (from which the Magical Assam ref content is apparently derived). Bakazaka (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:56, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Draftify

This should have never been accepted from AFC.  » Shadowowl | talk 15:16, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added BBC News ref to article, which brings number of reliable independent sources with significant coverage of subject to three, going by the above count. Bakazaka (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The article has reliable sources, particularly The Telegraph and the BBC news refs, that significantly cover the topic. Passes WP:GNG.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 22:36, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:36, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep 49.148.186.251 (talk)
• Keep since meeting the WP:GNG. gidonb (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete-Routine media-buzz, when someone from remote communities make it big.Fails NSPORTS and that is what matters.Also, fails GNG (Three news articles does not make-th it, for then we have to invoke BLP1E).∯WBG^converse 09:26, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articles in different years and different sources are about different events, so it might be helpful to specify which WP:BLP1E criterion applies. Bakazaka (talk) 21:44, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.