Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakub Cíger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jakub Cíger

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NHOCKEY. Fails #2 by 52 games (148 games inc. playoffs in Slovak Extraliga, 200 needed.) He is still active and playing in Slovak 1. Liga and he is 28 so there is a chance he may get over the mark in future but it's no guarentee of that. Tay87 (talk) 00:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article fails WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV of his career, which is so far WP:ROUTINE per WP:NHOCKEY player. The possibility of him becoming notable in the future is pure WP:CRYSTALBALL and irrelevant to the status of the article now. Newshunter12 (talk) 01:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete Lacks the coverage to meet the GNG and fails to meet any standards of WP:NHOCKEY.Sandals1 (talk) 16:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.