Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Lascody (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Lascody

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. This article was nominated just over a half decade ago and was kept on the grounds that he was on an MLS team, but the guidelines clearly state that you have to appear in a fully pro league match (or a competitive cup match that feature two fully pro teams) or in an international match for a senior national team. This player hasn't done it, therefore the article still fails. – Michael (talk) 02:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason:

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lascody and Wadsworth per nom. Keep Asante which seems to pass WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:09, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Keep Asante, which seems to satisfy WP:GNG. Doug Lascody doesn't even have a source backing up the statement that he played on an MLS team. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 15:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Asante due to multiple coverage in reliable sources, at least enough to pass GNG. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 18:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - coverage of Asante violates WP:ROUTINE and is not the "significant" coverage required by GNG. Giant Snowman 18:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - Players have not played in fully professional league, nor played senior international football, so failNFOOTY. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable coverage to achieve GNG. @TonyTheTiger: and @AmaryllisGardener: may wish to refresh their knowledge of WP:ROUTINE, the sources provided for Asante, are all either general match reports / transfer talk, for which there is established consensus that these do not count towards GNG, or are WP:PRIMARY sources relating to his own academy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fenix down (talk • contribs) 08:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as fails GNG. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.