Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catnapped!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Catnapped!

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a plot recap and character list, so basically cruft. Sources are user-generated and IMDB. Notability seems weak at best. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 22:52, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Anime and manga, and Japan. Just Another Cringy Username (talk)
Keep. The Anime Encyclopedia has apparently an entry and there is another here. Sources in French: Planète Jeunesse [fr] has a a page and there is this ; this in Dutch; this in English (generally accepted at Afds). At least, but that seems enough to attest notability and improve the page, which I am willing to do.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources by Mushy Yank. Fulmard (talk) 13:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources above, the subject has notability and the sources demonstrate that. Notability is based on the sources available, not on the current state of the article. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 23:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would sure be nice if the people who found those sources would take the time to add them to the article rather than just do a pro forma search for the sake of inclusionism. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 02:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to the comment above, that the user has said that he is willing to add them. I know next to nothing about anime. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
....: Would sure be nice if the people who found those sources would take the time to add them to the article rather than just do a pro forma search for the sake of inclusionism. is a gratuitous and extremely inappropriate comment, especially when "the people" who found and presented the sources to a deletion discussion that you initiated, have indeed said they are willing to add them to the page......-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely a bit on the snitty side for someone who seems to have missed sources Before, certainly. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 16:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources look to be mostly user-generated databases of kid's films, which IMO count as trivial mentions and not SIGCOV. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.