Talk:Catnapped!
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 September 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Catnapped!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050319172127/http://www.walkerplus.jp/movie/kinejun/index.cgi?ctl=each&id=31205 to http://www.walkerplus.jp/movie/kinejun/index.cgi?ctl=each&id=31205
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Recent removal of material
In the light of the recent Afd, especially, I don’t think those 2 edits (1: 2)(by the same user who had taken the page there) are justified. I don’t think that the sources in question are all either unreliable or user-generated. I mentioned this here as the page now seems rather not as good as it could be but, in these conditions, I am from now on unwilling to improve it. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- I removed those because they appear to be WP:USERGENERATED or otherwise WP:RSSELF. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2023 (UTC)