Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Lepage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Olaf Davis (talk) 20:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Camille Lepage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nice photojournalist, but mostly notable just for her recent unfortunate death. damiens.rf 15:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unable to find a reliable source about her before she dies. Lpele (talk) 16:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep I really don't get the "just for her recent unfortunate death" or "before she dies" point. There are sources (and good and reliable sources). The fact that these sources were published before of after her death is completely irrelevant. --Bsm15 (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The point is that her notability is, at beast, a WP:1E case. --damiens.rf 21:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep She was known before her death for her work, winning several awards and being published by most of the greatest newspapers. Enought sources to make a good entry with a lot of informations, and not only her death. --Kormin (talk) 05:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. For Wikinews. The subject can't be about an encylopedic methodology. Suprememangaka (talk) 23:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep : There are sources - Camille Lepage - Journalist (PYOi): second prize in the category 'Portrait' for the Vanishing Youth series, in Pictures of the Year International in 2013, the oldest photojournalism contest, dating from 1944, a leading worldwide.

Press : New York Times, The Guardian, Le Monde, The Washington Post ,Der Spiegel, Libération, Le Nouvel Observateur, La Croix, The Sunday Times, Wall Street Journal, Vice Magazine, Al Jazeera and was widely used by BBC. She had also worked for several non-governmental organizations including : WFP, Enough Project, UNESCO, Internews, Crown Agents,Deloitte, Amnesty International and Médecins sans Frontières.

Interviews : Camille Lepage au Sud du Soudan Itw sur Vimeo.com Portraits sur : Grainedephotographe.com - Sceno - Dvafoto.com - Frontlinefreelance.org - Petapixel - Konbini--Photomaltese (talk) 04:29, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep : There are a lot of sources all over the world. Jmex (talk) 10:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Camille Lepage was a young photojournalist with works already published in many significant papers in Europe and in America, with a Second Prize at POYi --Alain Schneider (talk) 10:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep looks like she was notable even before her death. Even if that is not the case, all that would mean is that the article would be renamed Death of Camille Lepage, as the death itself is clearly notable. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP -Look at her portfolio and then tell me she is most notable only for her death — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.5.211 (talk) 21:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep. Timing of coverage is irrelevant: obituaries are sources for a whole career but only appear when the person has died. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.