Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Brigance (third nomination)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Xoloz 20:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was PRODed, despite being previously AFDed. Reason given for PROD was: Not notable, less than 150 Google hits. Previous AFD's in September 2005 (result: keep) and December 2005 (result: no consensus) seemed to agree that the article needs major cleanup. The fact that major cleanup hasn't happened could be seen as supporting the idea that the subject isn't notable.Whitejay251 00:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup Brigance's IEP stuff is used worldwide and in the US by a ton of school districts to assess young childrens needs. I believe "Brigance" itself is a registered trademark, this link shows just some of the material available from him. I will accept responsiblity for cleanup and/or adding to the article if I can find anything substantial about him. DrunkenSmurf 13:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per DrunkenSmurf. The article establishes notability, and is verifiable. --Aguerriero (talk) 03:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MaNeMeBasat 14:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep please per drunkensmurf we have a million articles and most need cleanup so fix it Yuckfoo 17:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.