Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigance nom2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no concensus --Ichiro 19:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like an advert ComputerJoe 19:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Undecided - Possibly a notable researcher in his field, but it needs to moved, cleaned up and sourced. It got kept awhile back on an AfD but the article has not had a single non-vandalous edit since then. Like everything else, it just sits there. FCYTravis 22:57, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting this to generate more discussion. howcheng {chat} 21:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, no reason given to delete- please add link to previous AfD. -- JJay 22:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There's a confusion here between the man and his system. Article at least needs renaming. Previous Afd is here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigance

 Dlyons493 Talk 22:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename and expand upon system in order to differentiate from the creator. -- (aeropagitica)  00:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.