Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigance

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. No consensus. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 09:02, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oooo...tricky! Albert Brigance is probably non-notable in terms of an encyclopaedic entry, although it migh be interesting. The website link in this article is to a site selling the 'Brigance System', which makes it vfd advertising. Eddie.willers 02:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and clean-up. Looks like a noteworthy enough subject to me. --Oppolo 15:55, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but move to Albert Brigance. Google seems to indicate that his materials are fairly widely used, although the article desperately needs some good sources. -Splash 17:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As per nominator; it is non-notable and even if it might be interesting to someone, it's not encyclopedic. / Peter ^Isotalo 19:41, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.