User talk:Namiba

If you leave a message for me here, I'll respond here. If I leave a message on your talk page, I'll look there for a response. Please keep the conversation in one place

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Namiba, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

for not adding talk page tags? (projects) not a big deal either way, just wondering... JarrahTree 12:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you are referring to.--User:Namiba 12:56, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A large number of the categories and articles that you create have red links for the talk page - however the usual approach to the material is to have projects added -

from my experience of research re labour history in western australia - I have added items relevant: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Industrial_Workers_of_the_World_in_Australia it might not fit all items, just the unique circumstances of that subject.

in a lot of circumstance it is much simpler - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Industrial_Workers_of_the_World_in_Canada JarrahTree 13:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't tend to add tags. Others will add them if they want to do so. Everyone has different editing habits.--User:Namiba 13:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - thank you so much for your reply - that's fine - there are often many corners of wikipedia where no one is the slightest interested. But thank you very much for your main space additions about organised labour - very thorough, and thank you JarrahTree 13:18, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have a second account, the “Springs25I” is just a crazy coincidence, I swear. I do not know and am not Springs25I. It could be a troll or something. Springs24 (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Namiba. Do you have any interest in working on Crystal Dangerfield for DYK? I have about four days left to expand it fivefold, and it's already approximately that long. Thank you for starting this article! I am just a fan. - (talk) 02:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SusanLesch, the article looks great. You've done a lot of work to improve it from the stub I created. I don't have the time to work on it myself but I appreciate the work you've done. One small thing: a few of the points in the personal life section (like her favorite movie etc) seem trivial. Not sure if they should be included in an encyclopedia article.--User:Namiba 02:54, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you again for creating this. Agreed trivia is out of place in Wikipedia. I just think it's important to show nobody is 100% their sport. Does it look better now or should I remove the sentence: spending time with...? -SusanLesch (talk) 15:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think the "she enjoys..." sentence is probably not necessary. Those aren't particularly unique characteristics that cannot be written about most other people.--User:Namiba 17:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Fixed. -SusanLesch (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lamont Lilly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamont Lilly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mali presidential election, 2007 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

I noted you are a member of " countering systematic bias" on Wikipedia. I created an article Military of ancient Nubia to showcase the military prowess of the African civilization. Please check it out to ensure it isn't deleted and if you can even make it better , more information and widespread, then that will be really helpful. Kwesi Yema (talk) 17:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Libraries in Coos County, New Hampshire has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jp×g 05:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/1907 Skowhegan textile strike at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cottage Medi-Clinic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cottage Medi-Clinic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  22:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--—Bagumba (talk) 03:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba

Please visit WP:ANI before you do any more categorization of sports or athlete pages. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:57, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to US Cities notable people[1] criteria. People articles get categorized by where they were born or lived. Not gone to school. Going to school in Foo doesn't automatically make you from Foo. That has been the consensus around WP. You know why? I will give 3 examples-

Centereach High School students can come from Centereach, New York but also from Lake Grove, New York and even Selden, New York

Deerfield Beach High School students can come from Deerfield Beach, Florida, but also from Lighthouse Point, Florida, Hillsboro Beach, Florida, Coral Springs, Florida, and Parkland, Florida.

Lake Worth High School students can come from Lake Worth, Florida, but also from Atlantis, Florida, Lantana, Florida

and on and on and on....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodney Ferguson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Ferguson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to extend my thanks for all of your work, especially when there are people who make edits like this out of what appears to be malice. It's a shame that there are people here trying to build an encyclopedia and others who work so hard to destroy it. Sadly, I'm at ANI with this editor's spiteful reverts and stalking, but I at least hope it takes some off some of the heat that had been directed at you. Again, my sincere appreciation. Alansohn (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Justice Party (United States)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 12:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 1907 Skowhegan textile strike at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 07:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the nomination has been marked for closing since you have not responded to past pings about providing a quid pro quo review, which is required for DYK nominations. If you stop by right away to respond before it is closed, the nomination can continue, but it could close at any time. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While the review is no longer marked for closure, that's because you promised a review soon, and it's been over the standard seven days while you've been busy elsewhere on Wikipedia. Please be sure to post to the nomination if you won't be able to conduct the review in the next couple of days. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was happy to allow extra time for you to do your QPQ review, but your failure to respond is a problem. If I haven't heard anything in the next 48 hours, I will regretfully have to mark the nomination as unsuccessful. I hope you will give this the necessary attention. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Players of American football from Detroit has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SportingFlyer T·C 20:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've withdrawn the CfD for now. I proposed discussing things on the talk page first not because the RfC should be here, but to see if we can agree on how to pose the RfC question. SportingFlyer T·C 14:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you work on a question and I will respond to it?--User:Namiba 16:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Will try to post it here tomorrow. SportingFlyer T·C 16:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my proposed wording for the RfC. If it looks good to you I'll set it up. SportingFlyer T·C 14:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This RfC is to get consensus on clarification for WP:OCLOCATION in a very specific topic area: sports.

Dating back to the origin of WP:OCLOCATION, CfDs have consistently held that sportspeople should be categorised under two different directory structures: Basketball player by country/state, and Sportspeople by City: here and here (which has links to seven other previous CfDs). For an example of a sportsperson who is categorised in this way, see Luka Modrić.

In 2007, Dugwiki wrote this essay explaining the reasoning behind WP:OCLOCATION, which noted Do not replace national categories with state ones or city ones within an article because not all states and cities have occupational groupings. For example, a California writer should be under both Category:American writers (or a subcategory) and Category:California writers. Keep in mind that the goal here isn't to subdivide the occupation, but is simply to subdivide the geographical area. The project has operated under these guidelines for at least 13 years.

Recently, but mostly this year, many sub-categories have been created in the Category:Sportspeople by city or town category against the existing consensus. For instance, all three categories in Category:Curlers by city or town were created in 2020, as was Category:Canoeists by city or town, Category:Fencers by city or town, and many others.

Furthermore, in the last month, two WP:OCLOCATION CfDs have closed as no consensus: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_December_1#Basketball_players_by_city_or_town_in_the_United_States and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_November_15#Category:Basketball_players_from_Shkodër.

This has created a situation where consensus might be changing, but if it's not changing, cleanup efforts will be needed because of the recent proliferation of these categories. This RfC has been created to determine centralised consensus in order to provide clarity and avoid future conflict. The three options follow below:

• Option A: Maintain the status quo and continue categorising sportspeople by their sport and country/state of origin, and then "Sportspeople from X" for city.
• Option B: Maintain the status quo but allow exceptions for specific large cities which may be defining, such as Category:Basketball players from New York City (possibly as non-diffusing categories.)
• Option C: Change the status quo and allow players to be diffused by intersection of sport and city.

There is also a separate issue which has been identified where some players have been categorised into multiple locations, such as Stuart Pearce being "from" three different parts of London. That is beyond the scope of this discussion, but a follow-up conversation may be needed depending on this RfC's result. SportingFlyer T·C 14:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for writing this question, but I disagree with framing it as a clear change in consensus. There are numerous examples of similar categories existing for years with no issue. The issues has been that certain editors have opposed it for US categories while categories around the world are undisputed. I would rather frame it as an up or down with prejudicing the question of an existing consensus. As the most recent CFDs have shown, there is no present consensus. Moreover, WP:OCLOCATION allows for spliting large categories by location, which is the issue at hand. I would be happy to clarify that small categories should not be split by profession but large ones (say ones containing over 20 entries) can be split.--

I don't think that's a correct assessment. I've gone through most of the categories in that list and most of them were created in 2019 or 2020. I wouldn't call them undisputed. The ones I saw that weren't were rugby league or cricket. SportingFlyer T·C 15:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Basketball players from Greater London was created in 2015. Category:Boxers from Greater London (2017). Category:Footballers from Medellín (2017). Category:Association footballers from Auckland (2016). Those are just a random assortment of said categories and none are rugby league or cricket. As I said, opposition to these categories has been almost unanimously focused on preventing their growth among US sportspeople.--User:Namiba 20:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine - the majority of these have been created this year, and "Golfers from Leeds" (linked above) wasn't US-focused. Are you opposed if I nominate non-US categories at CfD instead of running the RfC? SportingFlyer T·C 17:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am opposed to nominating them for deletion in general. I think most of them are useful categories supported by policy. I would support a higher standard than the consensus of 5 to avoid being considered a small category but I do not support deletion. As I said, I don't think endless CFD's are the right way to make policy.--User:Namiba 18:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What would you propose as a way forward? SportingFlyer T·C 15:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this issue goes far beyond sportspeople categories. For example, there are 82 subcategories of Category:Military personnel by city, 16 subcategories at Category:American physicians by city, 124 subcategories of Category:Scientists by country and city, and 89 subcategories of Category:Architects by city to name just a few similar trees. I think it would be better to rewrite the policy to recognize that such categories should exist (when they contain a certain number of entries) rather than try to delete hundreds or even thousands of such categories.--User:Namiba 18:57, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think I should make a category of basketball players from philadelphia? I'm afraid the category is going get sent to CFD briskly. I believe that this should be a category for the same reason why Category:Basketball players from Los Angeles was created, due to it's rich basketbal culture and history dating back to the early days of the NBA with Wilt Chamberlain. Please feel free to leave your thoughts on the propose category. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 16:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is warranted on multiple levels. On top of the reasons you describe above, Category:Sportspeople from Philadelphia is overpopulated. However, it will probably be nominated for deletion at the present moment. As you can see from the above thread, there will likely be an RFC on such categories in the near future. If you do create it, I would suggest having the sources prepared to demonstrate how it is a unique topic in its own right.--User:Namiba 18:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I wrote why the Jewish American football player category should stay on the other page, but I’ll say it here again, I created it because there was already one for baseball and basketball

My message I think went into the philly one Bigmike2346 (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I answered your concerns on the discussion page.--User:Namiba 15:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Namiba, I just wanted to mention that there's currently an Editathon planned involving WP:LABOUR that you might be interested in: The Tech Worker Coalition wants to improve the coverage of unions and unionisation in the technology sector from February 19 to 21. There's already quite a list of things to do, but few people to do them. If you're interested, drop by! Shushugah (talk) 13:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Namiba... I've created a category for Basketball players from Chicago to follow up with the large city basketball players categories that were deleted 12 years ago. I will be adding the category and removing the parent categories as needed, Cheers. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 16:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅. I've started adding some. PetScan reveals over 300 articles to sort so there is plenty of work to do but I am glad that you started it.--User:Namiba 18:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Labor unionists from Illinois has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shushugah (talk) 11:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Labor unionists from Wisconsin has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shushugah (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Labor unionists from Massachusetts has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shushugah (talk) 11:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American labor unionists by state has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shushugah (talk) 11:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Happy 15 year anniversary! It is a pleasure editing with you and I appreciate your cordial and collaborative energy and contributions! Shushugah (talk) 20:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Socialist Resurgence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from 7Hills Skatepark, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! StarM 16:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EpicPupper 21:05, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oyabe, Gabon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an unsourced stub that is no better than a WP:DICDEF. Despite looking for this place both on and off-line (in the Times Atlas of the World) I can find no evidence that the place actually exists. The given coordinates are in the middle of wilderness, not near any roads or other communications, and no evidence of any settlement is visible

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Socialist Resurgence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:00, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Namiba, Thanks for adding this category to the Frances Turgeon Wiggin article - I didn't realize that there was a category for People from Lewiston, Maine (but now I know)! T. E. Meeks (talk) 12:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing the article! There are town and city categories for almost every municipality in Maine through the hard work of many fine Wikipedia editors.--User:Namiba 16:25, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for taking part in the above discussion but can you please sign your vote as it is not showing up, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Not sure if this is the right venue, but I received a message about the suggested deletion of the Fulbright Scholars category. Although the program gives out hundreds of awards per year, it is a unique American program and creates a community of scholars.

You should comment here. Also, don't forget to read the applicable policies to see if it is in fact defining as defined at WP:CAT. Also, don't forget to sign your posts.--User:Namiba 14:28, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hialeah Gardens High School alumni indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Emory Eagles basketball coaches indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you sure "Farmingham, Maine" is "Farmington, Maine"? I thought the same at first, but then I found "Farmingham road, Littleton, Maine" around 46°12'38.2"N 67°48'28.5"W no were near Farmington, so I think it may be not renamed, but just gone. All I could find was postcards of the place and a few mentions in the old newspapers. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I'm so blind, that's "Framingham Rd" not "Farmingham Rd"! KylieTastic (talk) 14:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am fairly certain it is referring to Farmington, Maine but I've emailed the Farmington Public Library to confirm if that is a former or incorrect name of the town. I will change it back to Farmingham if I am unable to confirm.--User:Namiba 15:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yup I think your right. This Postcard labelled "Farmingham" on the page actually has Farmington written on it, also I found an old book referencing "Sandy River Framingham" which would also collaborate it is just an old use or probbably just a misspelling of Farmington that got copied about a bit. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 15:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Namiba, my name is José and I'm working on a project in collaboration with members of the Rockland, Maine Historical Society about the Klan's presence in the Midcoast and more broadly Maine throughout history.

In scouring through issues of Rockland's Courier Gazette (which I had digitized a few decades of as a pretty sweet high school job), I noticed Bubar's name associated with some Klan figures of the time, and came across the article.

In particular, I am interested in the citation from the 1935 "Biographical Sketches of Members of Senate and House of Representatives of Maine" noting his connection to Billy Sunday as well as the article in the BDN noting his Klan connections. I was unable to find the Biographical Sketches in particular archived anywhere digitally, so I'm hoping if you have a physical copy, could you potentially photograph/scan the section about Bubar. Additionally, a screenshot/clipping of the article describing Bubar's gubernatorial run in 1934 and Klan connections would be very helpful.

if you want to reach me, the best way is via email. My address is Joe8937@gmail.com, if you're at all interested in the project I'm working on, then feel free to ask any questions! In viewing your page (still getting used to navigating this side of Wikipedia, although my heart tells me I need to start editing of course) I've also noticed an interest in the labor history of Maine, and this is another aspect I'm hoping to find more resources on.

Thank you,

José

Hi Jose, I would prefer not to email you privately, but an amazing resource for basic information on any state legislator is the Maine State Legislative Library, which can be reached at Lawlib.Reference@legislature.maine.gov. The reference librarian sent me what they have on Bubar as part of my research for the article. Regarding his connection to the Klan, I found letters from Bubar to his wife on Klan letterhead in the Bubar archive in special collections at the Fogler Library. I suggest signing up for a free trial for newspapers.com in order to look at the article in the citation. You can also look it up at any library with microfilm for the Bangor Daily News (like the Maine State Library, Fogler Library, and more).--User:Namiba 19:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Namiba, I thank you for creating the category entitled Category:Politicians from Fredericton as my response. I was reacting when I saw Category:Politicians from Fredericton and you replace from Category:People from Fredericton into Category:Politicians from Fredericton. When you're offline from changing categories. I was getting ready to have a chance for some editing assistance by myself because why, I change from "People from Fredericton" into "Politicians from Fredericton" by myself. So if you can thank me for editing assistance by changing the category into Category:Politicians from Fredericton that would be great. I change it two days ago and yesterday. I hope you will respond by thanking me for some editing assistance by changing to Category:Politicians from Fredericton. So thanks for the message I hope you will respond by thanking me by changing to "Politicians from Fredericton" two days ago and yesterday. Go to Category:Politicians from Fredericton and click on "Related changes" all of my edits will go under "2001:569". Thanks for the message and stay healthy during the difficult COVID-19. I thank you and have a great day. 2001:569:74D2:A800:E1B5:9033:FD85:7A6 (talk) 00:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Though I wasn't really changing the team parameter for many articles -- Preston may have been the only one. I was more focused on adding draft details rather than quibbling over something like this. Though it can be argued that these players will represent their NBA franchise in the Summer League, I honestly don't feel particularly strong about this issue. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 02:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm a freelance labor journalist interested in righting about anti-union/anti-left bias, and I saw that you're involved in the organized labor project. Would you be willing to do a phone or zoom interview sometime for an article I'm writing? TylerRDavis (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you proposed this article for deletion. It seems notable to me, and cites many sources. I think it is a nice little article about a troubled agency. In any case, usually the tag for proposed deletion points toward a discussion where we might vote Keep or Delete. Is such a process going for this article? If so, where is it? Many thanks, --PaulinSaudi (talk) 11:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PaulinSaudi, if you disagree with the nomination, you can remove the prod and add more sources if they exist. It's nominated via prod and is not up for a full discussion (yet).--User:Namiba 18:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I suppose I am just an inclusionist. --PaulinSaudi (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahmet Gueye, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Coloured Mozambican people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-Catholic activists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvbaron (talk) 12:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1860s-US-basketball-bio-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —¿philoserf? (talk) 04:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:MPLA indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Milwaukee City Council members has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 00:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Socialist Party of Colorado, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialist Party of Colorado until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Green Party of Tennessee, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Party of Tennessee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African Americans in World War I has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African Americans in World War II has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 19:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I respect accurate info. Claiming the SLP is still around and active is INNACCURATE INFO based on the stuff that is readily available and on the page itself. Like I said over and over: If there is something PROVING they are still around or have come back, let me see it. Otherwise based on the info we have. SLP IS DEAD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberaltarian12345 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing to keep wikipedia accurate. Like I said over and over. Find a source for them being active — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberaltarian12345 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ploni (talk) 13:24, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Gjevalin Gegaj to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 20:46, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Julie Jacobson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE search on multiple search engines produced no WP:RS-compliant sourcing that contained significant coverage of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. As long as the IP gets what he wants (right or wrong), he'll likely move one. GoodDay (talk) 20:30, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Baseball teams in Quebec City has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_19#American_people_of_European_descent_by_occupation

Hello, please restore Category:American trade unionists of Italian descent as there was absolutely no consensus to delete this category in the discussion you closed on Feb 13. User:Namiba 03:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your opinion. But the close was based off of the discussion.

The contents of that category were merged to Category:American people of Italian descent - jc37 05:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where were the arguments which specifically said that this category should be deleted?--User:Namiba 18:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, treating this as a request for clarification.

This was a group nomination. The main result was Merge/Delete most. A primary argument from several (including you) was WP:OCEGRS.

Based upon the discussion, it was clear that there was no consensus to merge "American gangsters of X descent". And that more discussion was needed concerning wrestlers and writers/poets. But there was no support for keeping any of the rest per OCEGRS.

I hope this helps clarify. - jc37 11:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"There was no support for keeping any of the rest per OCEGRS" except from myself and two other editors. Sources were provided which demonstrated why it is a unique subtopic and thus fails OCEGRS. I request that you re-read the discussion and pay closer attention to the arguments re: trade unionists.--User:Namiba 16:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at it again. And of course consensus is not a vote. A closer closes a discussion based upon the discussion and strength of arguments based upon current policy/process/practice. In particular noted in the discussion were Wikipedia:Categorization of people (Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality) and WP:OCEGRS, and how those apply to the categories in question. Also discussed (including by the nominator) was the concern about triple intersection (nationality, heritage, and occupation), etc.

All that said, if you wish to relist the trade unionists one (Category:American trade unionists of Italian descent) for a new discussion, I'm not opposed to that.

If the relist results in "keep", it should be easy enough to ask the bot owner to restore at that point. - jc37 17:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please relist this category, jc37.--User:Namiba 18:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Baseball venues in Saskatchewan has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Baseball venues in Manitoba has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:College basketball in Wisconsin indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Basketball competitions in Evansville, Indiana indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalist categories such as Category:Namibian footballers are non-diffusing, please do not remove them. GiantSnowman 10:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the policy on this, Giant?

I missed the discussion on whether to put houses under buildings and structures. I probably would have voted for the reason given. However there is a logical problem with the category, which has always bothered me. A house is a building and is also a structure. These terms don't distinguish anything. The way out in English is to use "other:" buildings and other structures, houses and other buildings, etc. If you felt it was worth while you could change some category names to be logically correct. No need to answer. Sorry I missed the vote.Botteville (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Art museums and galleries in the Gambia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Softball players from Rhode Island indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Category:Masonic buildings for no apparent reason, as u did for 2 in Pakistan? Why??? What are you thinking??? Did u remove it anywhere else?

For these 2 i created new Category:Masonic buildings in Pakistan, which you could have done. But they were fine where they were, did not need to be broken out further.

Are you experienced or new, and should u be blocked from using hotcat, i wonder. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 21:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doncram, these articles were already in Category:Masonic buildings completed in YEAR. Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with how categories work before making such bad faith assumptions on my talk page.--User:Namiba 15:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a hierarchy of categories of Masonic buildings by place, ie by country then in some countries by state or province. With some items in the top one, because it hadn't yet seemed necessary to create a country category for just one or two items. From which you removed those two.

Again, did you do that for any others? If so, could u please undo those edits, or need i go investigating your edit history further?

I am not an administrator, i am just an editor trying to develop good coverage of historic places and buildings. Occasionally encountering newish editors doing minor harm. It is a pretty basic thing for a wannabe categorizer to check: are there relevant subcategories into which an item should be placed, before u go removing it from a high level category. The fact u are not admitting error is not a good look, in my meeting u for the first time.

--Doncram (talk,contribs) 21:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not convenient on my current device, so I haven't yet reviewed your edits before i posted here. But i see that AFTER i posted here and asked you not to, you have gone on to do the same thing, for Victoria Masonic Temple and Plaridel Masonic Temple, at least. What gives. Can you please undo those and identify and fix any others.

Look, editors make mistakes. I make lots of mistakes, but i admit i have, apologize, and fix them...and learn...if someone has taken time to explain something to me nicely, and the same if they have been a bit abrupt. Because others being abrupt to you happens also, for whatever reason on their end, and that is a pretty good indicator they know stuff you don't. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 21:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing on Wikipedia since 2006, so perhaps you can cut it with the condescending tone? If you want to report me for disruptive editing, then go for it. Based on your approach to this, I have nothing further to say to you so please stop writing me.--User:Namiba 23:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Portland Star Match Factory, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ryanharmany (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Portland Water District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ice hockey competitions in Las Vegas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Basketball competitions in Winston-Salem, North Carolina has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Basketball competitions in Las Vegas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Basketball competitions in Nebraska indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've updated and worked on the content for 1971-72 Namibian contract workers strike that you established. If you could give it a look over when you have the time I would greatly appreciate it. If not that's perfectly fine. I just thought I'd ask since it's somewhat out of my area of expertise, and you've created many different articles in relation to Namibia when I checked your creations page. Thanks! LoomCreek (talk) 22:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LoomCreek, really outstanding work you've done with this article. I will take a closer look at it soon.--User:Namiba 23:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I am a somewhat blind to small grammatical errors when it comes to first revisions. So I'll try to go over it with a fine comb tooth over the next few days to catch those.

Also I'm not really familiar with the conventions of the South African English dialect. So those correction and changes are very much appreciated. LoomCreek (talk) 23:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As an update, there actually also seems to be a small short section on the strike on the South African Border War Page:

South African Border War#Political unrest in Ovamboland

Which provides a whole group of new sources to potentially use, particularly the later events of the strike. LoomCreek (talk) 06:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is great news! I would suggest expanding the introduction to provide a more thorough summary of the strike and the results. I started doing this in my most recent edits.--User:Namiba 13:09, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice! I'll try to expand summary and results over the next few weeks. LoomCreek (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Evergreen Cemetery (Oakland, California), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Evergreen Cemetery (Oakland, California), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Portland Water District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Namiba. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Saint Martin of Tours Parish, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I don't think parishes are covered by A7. Thank you. BangJan1999 21:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan. Qwerfjkltalk 16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited P. J. Conlon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Dorado High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2022 Sierra Leone doctors strike has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

News which is not relevant after the fact, i.e., in 2023

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chamaemelum (talk) 08:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chamaemelum (talk) 19:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gustavo Rangel Briceño has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian trade unionists of Italian descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:District attorneys in Cumberland County, Maine has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § X by Y in Z on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 11:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First off I think we need to choose names that describe such things better than saying thry happened before some even. I think we need to scrap the pre-confederation name. From an actual political perspective from 1841-1867 the main settled areas of Quebec and Ontario were the United Province of Canada so we maybe should have emigrants from the United province of Canada for people in that time frame, and then add Upper Canada and Lower Canada for earlier. I am not sure we have enough people emigrating from Rupert's Land or other areas in the west of British North America. I also wonder if a general Category:Emigrants from British North America might work. I know in common usage the United Province of Canada was referred to as Canada East and Canada West, but it was one political entity with one government. I am thinking we at most would need New Brusnwick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Isaland, United Province of Canada, Upper Canada, Lower Canada and Newfoundland cats. Newfoundland is first a colony and then a dominion. The fact that is exists for 82 years outside the Dominion of Canada makes things interesting. You can thus have emigrants from Newfoundland to Canada

Some of this goes to the tricky issue of how to avoid emigration categories, which are by nationslity, including people who are descrbed with the same terms but not to describe nationslity. The extreme we have at present is there is an Assyrian emigrants tree. The problem is not one of these people was an emigrant who was a national of Assyria. These are 20th century people of Assyrian ethnicity who left states in south-west Asia to move to most often states in Europe. I think we may have an Assyrian emigrants to Sweden cat. Emigrants should not be categorized by ethnicity, but by the country thry are nationals or subjects or citizens of. They may in a few cases have never been present in the country thry are citizens of, but thry need yo be citizens of it. For example a man of Chinese descent born in San Francisco, California who moves to Sao Paulo, Brazil is an American emigrant to Brazil, even if he never spoke a word of English in his life. However the child of a Chinese diplomat born and raised in Washington DC, learning English from his African-American nannies but never claiming American status, who moved yo Brazil and takes citizenship there, who has never set foot in China is a Chinese emigrant to Brazil. Sorry if this is so long, it is very refreshing to see an attempt to bring some of these emigration categories related to Canada yo have much better names.
John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

on further review I think we want an Emigrants from British North America. We have an article British North America that makes the scope clear. I think we want to include people leaving anywhere from the British North America until those places stop being such. In Newfoundland this is to 1907 when it becomes its own Dominion. In what we're the Province of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick it is 1867. In Prince Edward Island it is 1873, and there are a few other years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your thoughts. I think Category:Emigrants from British North America to the United States would make the most sense, especially if we also are attuned to including them in their provincial or colonial category.--User:Namiba 13:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American suffragists by state has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1943 rubber strike, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:One Monument Square, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 20 § Category:Foreign Ministers of X on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 18:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Libyan monarchs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish Americans by state has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're involved in writing this chapter (at least in some phases of it), I'd like to ask about references for the rulers' names indicated there, since thr article lacks them.

In addition, are Roger I & Roger II cited in this chapter in fact Roger I & Roger II accordingly ? (they seem to be the same, but approval is required).

Thanks, בנצי (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Residential buildings in South Africa by city has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Namiba -- I've declined this even though I note you remain the major contributor, because it dates to 2011 and has been edited in small ways by several others -- at some point I believe contributions become assimilated into the encyclopedia to the point that deletion G7 is no longer appropriate. I'd suggest WP:Proposed deletion. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 03:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you create "Tennis coaches from California"? It is redundant given that Category:American tennis coaches exists. I explained before that merging the categories is the first step to bring some organization and I feel as though (and I hope I am wrong) that you are undermining what I am trying to do.

For one, if you categorize coaches, there will be very few per state. Please try and understand and delete the category as the author. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 08:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you were able to create only two Categories for coaches, you realize there is no point in categorizing them.

You want to keep categories which serve no purpose. Please just cooperate with me on this one. It will be appreciated. Omnis Scientia (talk) 08:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've only begun to populate the American tennis coaches by state categories. There are many coaches of sport X by state, see Category:Coaches of American football by state for specific examples and Category:American sports coaches by state for the broader context. You are very enthusiastic about categorization but your comments indicate that you don't seem to understand the finer points of the process. I suggest familiarizing yourself with the main policies before editing further.--User:Namiba 13:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I have read it. Unsurprisingly, only team-sports coaches have 50 categories each, not single-player sports like tennis which have only. Hence why making these categories you are creating, despite my telling you not to, redundant. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where in those guidelines does it discuss the distinction between team sports versus single sports? There is a really handy tool I suggest you familiarize yourself with which can eliminate many problems https://petscan.wmflabs.org/ It allows you to see how many articles intersect two categories, thus allowing you to see which categories would be reasonably sized and which would not if created. If you look at American tennis coaches and sportspeople from California, you will see that there are dozens of articles which can reasonably be placed in Category:Tennis coaches from California. As you know, a category with 34 articles can hardly be called redundant.--User:Namiba 14:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I am trying to say is that this is my project. I started it. I created the tennis player categorization. I feel that I know more about tennis to do this. It is why I am asking you to stop. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again I would ask you to reverse your vote in the Cfd. There is no point in having tennis people categories for every state. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate your enthusiasm here, what you're saying is that you WP:OWN this and that is not acceptable. I have heard your thoughts and ask that you move along and refrain from commenting on my talk page about this further. Thank you.--User:Namiba 15:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will say one last thing: the least you could have done is wait for the Cfd discussion to close. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would also advise to tell you to NOT remove pages from Category:American tennis coaches. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear that you took this the wrong way so please allow me to explain: the reason why I told you to delete ONE category with TWO pages in it (as it was at the time I messaged you here) is because I felt you were acting prematurely. I STILL think you should have waited for the discussion to close before you made the categories but it is your right to do what you want.

And to make it clear, I don't feel like I own the categories. I'm sorry if I seemed to imply that, that was not my intention. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Omnis Scientia, thanks for apology. It's all good, no hard feelings.--User:Namiba 01:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:School buildings in Idaho indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:School buildings in Idaho has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Buildings and structures in South Africa by type by city indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For using wikipedia correctly. NYT has been deemed reliable whereas Salon is deprecated. I noticed there were two other instances where Salon was used so I removed them. If the information can be presented using a reliable source, it can be re-admitted with proper sourcing. 107.10.129.126 (talk) 17:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 21 § Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 12#Category:School buildings in Oregon on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. Sorry I didn't get around to protecting that page yesterday; I was too absorbed in real life. Glad to see that someone else handled it. Just didn't want you think that I was ignoring you. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I saw that your cat passed away and I'm sorry for your loss.--User:Namiba 16:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I referred to the articles in that category, as there were multiple fiction works that took liberties to take details from the real cases to write them into their stories. It’s not too big a deal that you’ve deleted the category, but may you at least place a list of the articles formerly in that category on my page? It would help me in the future so I don’t forget which cases were there and what similarities I may remember they had to certain fiction works. Kindly reply on my page so I get the notification. ContributingHelperOnTheSide (talk) 00:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African-American women lawyers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Zoos established in 1752 on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Education by city or town on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just had someone justify placing someone in an ethnicity category by saying "we can tell the person's ethnicity by looking at their picture." While their overall reason for this particular case is a little more justified (it also relies at looking at what college they went to), the fact that an editor would say such a thing I find disturbing. I am also sure people have done it with even less justification. In fact I think at one point we had some ethnicity and descend cats based solely on looking at pictures. We also had some descent categorization based on saying "this last name is of x ethnic origin, thererfore anyone who has it has ancestors from x". I guess Columba Bush is of English descent. OK, people normally do not assume based on married names, but I am sure an editor somewhere has.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Truly, truly irresponsible editing.--User:Namiba 20:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Belarusian-language newspapers published in the United States has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. toobigtokale (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have extremely useful information on the Guy Lafleur article you edited. I am related to him 47.200.80.165 (talk) 19:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Party of Freedom and Solidarity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AusLondonder (talk) 05:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ice hockey people from Tennessee has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George F. West, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ice hockey competitions in South Dakota indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robby.is.on (talk) 10:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Terry (baseball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, Pennsylvania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United Unions Building, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been sorting Category:Baseball players from New York (state) and Category:Baseball players from Texas.--User:Namiba 01:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiOriginal-9 FYI I've bene working on Category:Baseball players from South Carolina, Category:Baseball players from Illinois, and Category:Baseball players from Maryland.--User:Namiba 21:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiOriginal-9, if you have time, I would appreciate help sorting Category:Baseball players from Ohio.--User:Namiba 14:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an experienced editor, but do see a number of errors in the WIKI page about the Prohibition Party. The party color is not PINK, the flag shown was never a party flag (reading the actual book referenced proves that the flag was the flag of the WCTU and not of the Prohibition Party. There are other errors as well. The image of Michael Wood is from the official party website. I am not sure how to get these changes made... am hoping for your support. Thanks! 84.172.212.229 (talk) 15:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LoomCreek, thank you for your kind words and for the recognition. I really appreciate your many thoughtful contributions to the project as well!--User:Namiba 15:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I appreciate it! Best wishes, LoomCreek (talk) 18:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Your vote on this deletion entry reflects a totally inaccurate reading of the category's title. It is not arguing that Susan Collins is the only Republican ever elected to statewide office, but is stating the objective fact that she is currently the only Republican in statewide office. Please change your vote to reflect the actual meaning of the category. Thank you. 1Matt20 (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I very much appreciate your work with the categorization of enslaved people by state. Thank you for doing that. jengod (talk) 14:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

jengod, thank you for noticing and for your kind words. If you're able to help populate them, I would be most appreciative. Thanks!--User:Namiba 15:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "United Unions Building".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Islam in San Marino, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba,

Please be careful when placing a CSD tag on a category that is being deleted due to a CFD closure. We need the deletion rationale/summary to have a link to the CFD discussion and not say that the category is being deleted due to other speedy deletion criteria. Maybe try putting the CSD tag UNDER the CFD notice would help. We typically use Twinkle to delete pages and it is picking up the CSD reason, not the link to the CFD discussion. If you have questions, ask Marco or Mason or one of the other CFD regulars. Right now, I'm just reverting your edit and then deleting the category but there must be a simpler way to delete categories that are part of a CFD closure. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 15 § X by ethnic or national origin on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Baseball players from Ames, Iowa has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Woodfords Congregational Church, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Namiba! Would you be able to take a look at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 25#Category:Populated places on the Underground Railroad and specify which populated places currently in Category:Populated places on the Underground Railroad should be merged to Category:Underground Railroad locations? You can just do so by replying here; I can take care of putting the close into effect. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 21:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, the primary locations for the Underground Railroad have all been sorted out and the category can be deleted.--User:Namiba 13:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you previous nominated Category:Madison Square Garden for deletion, and it was purged. Since then, a user has repopulated with Category:Events at Madison Square Garden and two subcategories. Any thoughts? Flibirigit (talk) 00:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flibirigit, I think it should be speedily deleted but WP:OCVENUE is being inconsistently applied at CFD. See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_July_16#Category:Boxing_matches_at_Madison_Square_Garden. You may be interested in commenting here.-User:Namiba 22:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have time to do the nomination? I'm rushed for time here and on vacation. Flibirigit (talk) 00:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I finally had time for the nomination. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_August_13#Category:Events_at_Madison_Square_Garden. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 16:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Woodfords Congregational Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why removal of his Jewish history in 2020? 2603:8001:6AF0:4930:921:CA7A:CB23:750D (talk) 04:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As in this edit, individuals who belong in Category:Hackensack High School alumni are not necessarily from Hackensack and do not belong in Category:People from Hackensack, New Jersey. The school currently serves students from Rochelle Park and South Hackensack, and in the past has served residents of several other municipalities. And as I undid in this edit, people who are buried in Hackensack Cemetery are not people from Hackensack; they may never have stepped foot in Hackensack during their lifetime. This is equally true for most other schools and is absolutely true for all other cemeteries. Alansohn (talk) 16:14, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Having your permanent resting place be in a specific location does make someone FROM that location. They have a long-lasting and permanent connection to the place, in at least death if not life.--User:Namiba 16:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posing the question at Wikipedia talk:Categorization; you beat me to it and posed both of our positions fairly and accurately in asking for additional input. I hope that the discussion there addresses the issue in Hackensack Cemetery and elsewhere. Alansohn (talk) 22:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Office and Professional Employees International Union has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Office and Professional Employees International Union leaders has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Office and Professional Employees International Union leaders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namiba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "George F. West".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You made a change to USL W League and after making the change asked a question in your edit summary. This probably should have been brought up on the talk page and discussed. If you look at the reference for the lead section, USL W League self defines as a pre-professional league. I agree that this is likely amateur, but making that assumption likely fall under original research, so I think using the reference to define what is in the article is a good approach. Demt1298 (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the article as I left it, I realized this and that is why I removed both pre-professional and amateur.--User:Namiba 15:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 10 § Straggler LGBT categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Micaela Reis has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Alumni by high school in Canada indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 00:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:People by high school in Canada indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your edits on this article however I needed to revert some of them in order to avoid close paraphrasing of original sources. Please reply to this thread or message me on my talk page if you have any questions. Lam1357 (talk) 15:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American soccer players of Nigerian descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crowsus (talk) 00:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Namiba! The university and college buildings by years categories you created in 2020, e.g. Category:University and college buildings completed in 1931, should probably all be subcategories of the school buildings by year categories, as I did for example here. Cheers, Sdkb ^talk 06:21, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 14 § US state independents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jjamesryan (talk | contribs) 15:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sportspeople from Tewksbury, Massachusetts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lost in Quebec (talk) 09:50, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Union people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the discussion. If the oppose !votes for categories that weren't even in the discussion were discounted, it probably would have been deleted. 60% of the parent cat is African American sportspeople. It's redundant.

The closer said "No prejudice against speedy renomination of smaller groups of categories" but you only nominated three categories in the first place... ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Namiba. I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cheri Honkala, Counterpunch is also a poor quality source. I have no problem with you including the information, but it must have a proper source first. This is a BLP article so we have to follow best practice. Please don't re-add poorly sourced info. I would prefer for this not to require escalation. As I say, I'm not invested in the subject being ultimately categorised or not, so long as the sourcing for this is strong. Lewisguile (talk) 19:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are now reverting me on multiple pages, I will have to insist you follow best practice for BLPs and categories. Categories must be defining, which means they are something that RSes "commonly, consistently" use about the subject. If RSes commonly refer to the subject in this way, then please add them to the article first. BLPs shouldn't have anything poorly sourced, whether positive, negative or neutral. There have been arbitration decisions considering this very issue recently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#c-ScottishFinnishRadish-20241115132000-Bohemian_Baltimore. Blanket adding of contentious categories is likely to be seen as failing WP:NPOV and the WP:ONUS is on the editor who adds the text. The fact the recent CfD has 14 for deletion and 10 for keep is evidence that this is a highly sensitive topic area, so it deserves due care . Categories also become worthless if they're used too often.

Lewisguile (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, am new on Wikipedia. Please can you help me, "How can i make my text to be in BOLD Face type and in ITALIC Handwriting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexvide Robotics (talk • contribs) 21:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]