User talk:ewlyahoocom

This user may have left Wikipedia. Ewlyahoocom has not edited Wikipedia since October 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archive

Welcome!

Hello, Ewlyahoocom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Sincerely, Ryan 09:15, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

The disambiguous page was deliberately created with the unusual format based on the unusual overlapping uses of the term. It took quite a bit of discussion to arrive at the current format. Check out the long discussion on the article's talk page. It is a key page for WikiProject American Open Wheel Racing, and it is monitored closely. Please open a discussion if you would like to propose a change to the format. Remember, the Manual of Style is a guideline, not a policy. Cheers! Royalbroil ^T : C 12:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it should not be a disambiguation page? Ewlyahoocom 21:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that I've listed a redirect you've created, try before you buy, for deletion on WP:RFD. While redirecting from a specific topic to a broader topic can be useful, I think it can be confusing to redirect from a broad topic to a more specific one. If you disagree I am more than willing to retract my listing. Thanks. —INTRIGUEBLUE (talk|contribs) 20:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An anon had swapped the pages around using cut and paste; you reverted to the correct ISO redirecting to the standards organization by redirecting and moving. Unfortunately, that made most of the history appear in the wrong place, which I (think I) have repaired. If you see users moving pages by cut and paste, you can report that at WP:SPLICE to have it fixed. Note that the disambiguation page should be at Iso, with Iso (disambiguation) redirecting to it, not the other way around, see WP:DAB#Page_naming_conventions. Anyway, it is fixed now. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 14:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a name of a book. Why did you redirect it? They are making a movie about it too.

If you don't believe me click here. OBEY STARMAN 19:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I initially created Already dead as a redirect to Death. But then someone moved it to Already Dead -- it probably would have been better just to make a new page at that location, but whatever. It's all good cause Already dead can redirect and Already Dead can be about the movie. Cool? Ewlyahoocom 07:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, I was just checking up and letting you know. OBEY STARMAN 13:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Actually I think it should redirect to the book, already dead doesn't seem to deal with death. :P

OBEY STARMAN 17:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you're wondering why your recently-added link was removed, it's because there was already a link to this on the page for the Western honey bee, which is the only species of honey bee affected; the honey bee page is intended for things that apply to ALL species of honey bees, not just the one common species. That's why the Western honey bee has its own page - so things about that species can be kept in the proper context. Dyanega 22:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've answered your question at Talk:Curve#Mechanical_curve. LokiClock (talk) 20:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You added the mergeto Template to Entree, which reads "It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into Hors d'œuvre. (Discuss)". There has in fact been discussion on that Talk page, which is unanimously opposed to the merger, yet you went ahead with the merger without even contributing to the discussion. Could you please join the discussion? Thanks, --Macrakis 20:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check the edit history, was the merger done here (by another user)? The page as you've left it just dupliactes information available at the other more relevant articles. In any case, now the article is/should be a dismabiguation page -- and it should follow the format of disambiguation pages. Ewlyahoocom 03:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you're right, Vegaswikian actually changed it, but you reverted to the dab page version. That is a mistake, as discussed in the talk page, because an Hors d'oeuvre is actually a different concept from an Entree (in the sense of "first course"). In a full meal in France, you have Hors d'oeuvre (a.k.a. amuse-bouche, amuse-gueule, appetizer), then Entree (a.k.a. premier plat = first course), then Main Course (then Cheese then Dessert). In Italy, they are called Antipasto, Primo, Secondo. U.S. usage is of course somewhat different, since "Entree" has come to mean "Main Course", but that's another matter.... --Macrakis 14:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you have contributed to the article Multiple personality controversy, you may wish to know that it has been suggested that the article be merged into Dissociative identity disorder. For the sake of objectivity, I have not checked to see what your personal contribution to the article was it is best to notify interested parties regardless of whichever position, if any, they might take. See discussion at Talk:Multiple_personality_controversy#Request_for_comment:_suggested_merge_between_Multiple_personality_controversy_and_Dissociative_identity_disorder Doczilla 21:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You created a redirect from NILF to Mélissa Theuriau. I'm curious, what's NILF? Gobonobo ^{T C} 05:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for speedy delete. Funny joke, it gave me a smile, but unfortunately it's not really encyclopedic and thus it has to go. Thanks for the grin, though, Ewlyahoocom. Joie de Vivre 20:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying to help, but there actually is no article at MILF. The link was transwikied to Wiktionary, the wikipedia-esque dictionary. Joie de Vivre 20:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have put Thriller (disambiguation) up for WP:RM to Thriller. Simply south 22:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I remember there being a bot that moved those "misplaced" disambiguation pages automatically -- maybe it stopped working. Ewlyahoocom 00:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Maikel 13:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What'chu talkin' 'bout, Willis? Ewlyahoocom 18:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may whant to check you grammar and spelling Lonewolf2019 (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Long horse (beast)) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Corvus cornix 18:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In crick, you changed the link creek which points to stream to creek (water). The creek (water) article redirects to stream. There is no need to make this change, and in doing so you have introduced an unecessary step in finding the linked article. Did you have any special reason for doing this? Since I am in the business of fixing redirects, I changed it back. Please let me know if you have any ideas brewing that require this extra redirect. Zab 02:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation_pages)#Piping: "This guidance to avoid piping means that a link to a redirect term will sometimes be preferred to a direct link, if the redirect term contains the disambiguation title and the redirect target does not." Also if, for some unfathomable reason, Creek (water) became a real page, then it would be a better link. Of course, reasonable people can disagree :-) Ewlyahoocom 04:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on -- when you say that you're "in the business of fixing redirects", what do you mean? May I suggest that you also review the section at Wikipedia:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken? Ewlyahoocom 04:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was originally a link to a disambiguation page. The fact of the matter is that creek served the same purpose as creek, and was probably less resource intensive. So why change? Zab 04:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What was originally a link to a disambiguation page? Ewlyahoocom 04:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Daddy daughter date night, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.150.205.106 05:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you added {{disambig-cleanup}} to Candelaria. I'm eager to fix the page, but i'm not sure what about it you dislike. Could you give me some more specific criticism? Thanks. Foobaz·o< 16:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Generally, there should be only one link per line. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) for more specific information. Ewlyahoocom 17:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved Charge (baseketball) to Charge (basketball), so: A tag has been placed on Charge (baseketball), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JHunterJ 15:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I replyed at User_talk:Sparafucil#Macbeth (disambiguation) Sparafucil 05:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for pointing out that there was already a Kg (disambiguation) page. Believe it or not, I did look before adding the Kg for King entry to Kg, but could not find (I can only assume that a mispelt disambiguation when I searched). My apologies for any confusion I caused. With regard to your second point about pointing to an article with the information this poses a problem. The thing is, the term does not apply to only one indivdual, and so linking it to a saint who happened to be a king would be overly specific and exclude others. Perhaps an article on Saints that were also monarchs would bridge this? Can the link from disambiguation be to a list? The reason I linked to Monarch was because it appeared to be the best generic fit at the time. Thanks again. Kwib 10:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:List of words having different meanings in British and American English#Athlete and Talk:Sportsperson for my comments in response to your revert. I intend to change it back if you don't have a good counter-argument. Regards, Alex9788 09:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Talk:Athlete. No-one else has made a comment as of yet, and if no-one does soon I'm going to just make my proposed change. Athlete has also now been listed on List of words having different meanings in British and American English, so your original excuse for reverting my edit is void. If you've got something to add please do, but otherwise please let me know it's ok to change the redirect. Thanks, Alex9788 14:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm convinced. Ewlyahoocom 04:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to you on my talk page. Alex9788 09:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the record it couldn't be moved as both pages originally existed so i had no option but to merge them. Also i was planning to fix redirects, hadn't had time yet. thanks --Childzy ¤ Talk 10:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the tip :] --Childzy ₪ Talk 19:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the UK, and I always understood a 'flyover' to be a high-level road overpass, or one existing solely for grade seperation. I had never heard of an 'overpass' until relatively recently. In short, I do not believe that use of 'flyover' to be US-centric. Midlandstoday 16:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply at Talk:Overpass#Flyover

WP:SOFIXIT if you know the WP:MOS better than I do. Wl219 02:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually whoever changed it from a redirect should be the one to disambiguate links. --NE2 04:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message "...Each bulleted entry should, in almost every case, have exactly one navigable (blue) link..." And even more to the point, from the style manual: "These pages are not for exploration, but only to help the user navigate to a specific article."

I wasn't aware of this policy. I'm not sure if I agree with it (a 1- or 2-sentence explanation seems a good idea to me), but "dura lex sed lex"; if that's the policy so be it and I'll try to stick to it in future. Pol098 21:08, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate your comments on an edit of yours at Talk:Weird. I'm just trying to figure where you're coming from on this. Alvis 04:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why the name change? I can't see any discussion of it at the article talk page. --Dweller 21:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's how it's called in the article, so why not have the article itself share that name? Ewlyahoocom 21:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. The article seems to call them by both names. I'll ask my favourite historian for some input. --Dweller 21:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this thread... User_talk:Clio_the_Muse#Ordinances. Can I suggest you move the article back over the redirect and then open a consensus debate at the article talk page if you still wish to move it to the "New" nomenclature? It's usual to debate any potentially contentious major edits before undertaking them. Thanks --Dweller 09:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please continue this thread at Talk:New Ordinances of 1311#Requested move. Ewlyahoocom 17:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, I don't seem to be awake enough tonight, thanks! :) SQL^{(Query Me!)} 05:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Per the Manual of Style entry, the Dungeons and Dragons meaning isn't dominant over the others, so it gets mixed in with the rest. None of them qualify as mainstream, really. Doctor Sunshine talk 14:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then shouldn't you be moving the articles around, to put that disambiguation page at the primary usage? Ewlyahoocom 15:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent point. Doctor Sunshine talk 18:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Could you please explain why you removed the primary topic style (these edits). Thanks! Ewlyahoocom 08:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I wasn't aware of that style. I put it back correctly. ——Martin^phi _{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 19:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the target of this redirect to Date Palm, since that seems to be a more specific result. -- Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 07:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On my talk page you mentioned you changed the above to a disambiguation page. You said, "That editor didn't fix any of those links so there are now a few hundred ambiguous links left pointing at this page.. instead of being part of a template these links are plain old links, so there's no easy fix."
I am sort of curious, how would they be a template for this purpose? A lot of these pages call that page through a template, meaning it could be possible to change the reference there, but if that's not what you meant, perhaps you can give me a little insight because I am interested. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) 05:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, I didn't change the page to be a disambiguation page (sorry if I that wasn't clear). As part of a navbox-type or infobox-type template. An anon editor made similar changes (e.g. here) using some table code that looked kind of like a navbox. One change to a template (e.g. here) can "fix" all the pages that transclude it. Ewlyahoocom 05:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:NoGringo#making_a_disambiguation_page_at_List_of_North_American_area_codes thanks for your msg. after some days we will see what stays. If this is a lot, than WP:BOT should be used. NoGringo 12:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a Gringo? Please respect/keep in mind that this is a collaborative project! Stop pushing other editors, you are free to request a bot, like everyone else is. Cheers. NoGringo 16:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have one question: why did you move the existing Mutton article to Mutton (disambiguation) and then not create any links to Mutton (disambiguation)? Propaniac 00:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching my mistake! (I've added a dablink to to the top of Sheepmeat.) Ewlyahoocom 01:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a plea not to change article titles. We have an established system at the Opera Project and we want to keep to it. Thanks. -- Kleinzach 04:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OOps, my bad. (In my defense I didn't find anything about this at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (operas). I guess applied what I learned at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) to an inappropriate context.) Ewlyahoocom 05:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know this is a difficult area. The Opera Project section is here. I've now added it to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (operas). -- Kleinzach 05:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For continued excellence in formatting, arranging, reformatting, rearranging, fixing redirects, requesting moves, and generally improving disambiguation pages (as well as turning them into set index articles when warranted), I hereby present you with this barnstar. Your help is greatly appreciated, even when it's in the background. Dekimasuよ! 05:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ewlyahoocom 06:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He there, I was looking at your recent Oppose opinion and I was wondering if you should change it to Merge with amendment as you seem to be proposing a variation on what Christopher Tanner said.

Just asking - Jeremy (Jerem43 08:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Better? Jeremy (Jerem43 08:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Sounds awful. Try "Fixation (eye movement)". I don't approve the merging unless the title is changed to what WP is used to. Tony (talk) 06:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

It will be good if you support your claim of possible copyright infringement by the article Network Security. The URL you have cited, http://choosenetworks.com/Security.htm, has no text even remotely resembling the contents, nor does it hint at any infringement. Let's save the article from being deleted unduly. Thank you. Raanoo 13:21, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Followup at Talk:Network security#No evidence of copyright infringement. Ewlyahoocom 18:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, first of all i want to apologise for that confusion about "Supra (disambiguation)", i just wanted and still want to make that page better as you do of couse, so let's combine our opinions?! Here is mine:

A school is an institution for learning. School may also refer to: School (discipline), a group of people with common characteristics in what they do, e.g. a school of painting, or a school of thought "School" (song), by the grunge music group Nirvana School (band), a band from Konami's Pop'n Music series A swarm of fish

You know this is from Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)(as you linked it for me), well i like this look of 'disambiguation page' and why don't we make it like that. I understand why you've removed the redlink, but i fail to understand why you removed the very Latin word Supra, i think it must be on. I think it will be better to reedit the page like this:

A Supra is a Latin word meaning "above". Supra may also refer to: and s.o.

Kind regards --Rastrelli f 10:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you removed the link to git's in Porcelain (disambiguation)[1] page? Even the Wikipedia article talks about it. Urelement 20:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reference: [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porcelain_%28disambiguation%29

Git is a disambiguation page. So how is that link helpful? Ewlyahoocom 22:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know what to do because someone keep vandalising on me because he is removing my contribute. What do I do? Please help me Colleenthegreat 02:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Thank you so much. I am new here and I have no idea what I am doing so I wrote to different people but you are the only one who helped. Colleenthegreat 02:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't leave messages as you did with these three edits, even when I continuously reverted them. This is considered to be trolling and may warrant a block. Miranda 03:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Just how far down does that meter go? ("5. As always, please adhere to WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA"?)Ewlyahoocom 03:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to know if your Computer could be modified to flag redirects that have heaps of extra text following the redirect tag. For example, when Computer made this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Erusea&diff=160868752&oldid=160406683 Thanks! Ewlyahoocom 06:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The bot itself is not capable of doing that. Why do you seek this? I can come up with a better answer or solution then. -- Cat ^chi? 15:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

I ran across a set of pages like that and they totally screwed up Special:Whatlinkshere such that it looked like things were redirecting in bizarre ways (see also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Totally confusing set of double-redirects). I wondered if there was a way to generate a list of "long" redirects (where long was anything beyond the redirect and optional redirect templates) but didn't find one. So yes, a better solution would be much appreciated! Ewlyahoocom 17:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Supersweet, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Supersweet is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Supersweet, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you put Repeater (student) as a redirect to grade retention? You cannot make changes if you did not discuss with everyone. I am trying to put grade retention as a redirect to Repeater (student). So that's why I put up a discussion board before it gets redirected. That's the correct way to do things here. I want Repeater (student) as a separate article instead of grade retention. There's a reason why I asked for a change of title. You did the same to continuation school. You knew that we were discussing and you just simply don't care. You just went and redirected repeater (student). that's not right. I'm waiting for an apology. --Nitsirk 21:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having this redirect has no bearing on the move discussion, nor does it present any hinderance to your moving the page to that location. May I refer you to WP:Redirect and Help:Moving a page#Moving over a redirect? Ewlyahoocom 01:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the accusation. --Nitsirk 12:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to direct your attention momentarily to...

• User talk:Hopiakuta#Do you use a screen reader
• User talk:Hopiakuta#WP:ANI#User: Hopiakuta
• User talk:L'Aquatique#Hopiakuta

We (the folks at Wikiproject Accessibility) have been looking over his case for a while, and have yet to really figure out what is going on.
I just want to thank you for taking an interest in this user... however I have to warn you that the response you get may not be the one you expect or want.
Feel free to e-mail me, respond here, or leave a message on my talk page if you wish to discuss this further... --(L'Aquatique: Bringing _chaos & ^{general mayhem} to the Wiki for One Year!) 22:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why does too cheap to meter redirect to Nuclear Power. Makes no sense. 06:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.255.187.32 (talk)

One of the promises of nuclear power was that its energy would be too cheap to meter i.e. it would cost more to install a meter and bill the customer than the electricity was worth. It becamse a kind of catchphrase for the industry.[1][2][3] Ewlyahoocom 15:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a very critical comment on the Teflon page, but the rationale for adding it is that bird owners often have no idea that Teflon cookware is lethal. I read the article you cited on Teflon Flu, but it doesn't mention that birds are much more sensitive to it. Is that worth adding there? What do you think? Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 07:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Between a page about non-stick surfaces and a page about Polymer fume fever, I think that information would be better suited to the page about Polymer fume fever. Ewlyahoocom 07:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

We've now got something like five disambiguation pages for this subject, all of which link to each other. These need to be consolidated in one place at Teflon, which should disambiguate the whole lot. We were heading towards this, but it's all messed up again thanks to non-stick surface. Any thoughts? Chris Cunningham 12:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping that having a section in a new, broader non-stick surface article would give us someplace to consolidate the duplicated information about the Teflon trademark. In any case, most users searching for Teflon are probably looking for non-stick surfaces generically and would not necessarily be interested in DuPont's trademarked use of the term. Ewlyahoocom 15:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's as may be, but they should be pointed at the PTFE article in this case, not one which has next to no information in it. That DuPont apply the "Teflon" trademark to lots of things other than PTFE isn't really relevant to us. Most people think of PTFE when they think of Teflon, and that's where we should point people unless we're really sure that they don't want PTFE. Chris Cunningham 18:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to split up the "Nations and Organizations of Ace Combat Article" to keep it from becoming to long. Sorry if I screwed up, figured I would.Rogue Commander 02:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for bringing that over, I was trying to make a statement about his position being groundless and suggested if he thought it had ground to suggest to try and get the template deleted. He apparently took me seriously. –– Lid^(Talk) 12:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, you forgot to sign your message. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:PaidProgramming.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article For The Win (Internet slang), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of For The Win (Internet slang). Harland1 ^t/_c 15:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Las Vegas (summary), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Las Vegas (summary). JHunterJ (talk) 13:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It claimed to be a summary-style article, but otherwise appears to be a disambiguation page redundant with Las Vegas (disambiguation). Was it supposed to become a main space article? -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think at this point it was a summary style article but the pages have been moved and redone a bit since then and now I've lost track. I'd agree that it's now best to go ahead and delete it. Ewlyahoocom (talk) 21:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the disambig.s etc around this subject. Much improved. Fainites ^barley 15:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Hoodoo (song), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoodoo (song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added a bunch of pictures to the page....Have fun with them....:)Mr. Green^{Hit Me Up}About Me 16:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated Seeing pink elephants for deletion. Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seeing pink elephants.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tim Vickers (talk) 18:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kroma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin 12:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Supersweet, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supersweet. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ewlyahoocom/WikiPr0n, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ewlyahoocom/WikiPr0n and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ewlyahoocom/WikiPr0n during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nate1481 11:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Asperger's reunion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

per anon: "please, remove this silly redirection. It's either a bad joke or a (failed) attempt to insult either Aspies or Sci Fi fans"

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stephenb (Talk) 12:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lightning doodle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Neologism - the only source given is Youtube

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ooops!, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

There is no evidence that this show ever existed, since the only link provided is dead.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Optimusnauta (talk) 07:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Steakosaurus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Richard⁰⁶¹² 21:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:101-kd-patch.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Eurofag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Dweller (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Incompetent and unaware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 16:15, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated POOP (fictional brand) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A long time ago you contributed to Talk:Cow (disambiguation); the topic of that discussion has come up again. --Una Smith (talk) 14:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have made several edits to Seal (device), this message is to notify you that the article has recently been moved without discussion, and a discussion is now taking place at Talk:Seal (impression)#Recent move to decide the most appropriate name. As a contributor to the article, your ideas and comments are valued in this discussion. Thank you. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Accounting irregularities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Accounting irregularities do not necessarily mean that someone has committed malfeasance. An irregularity in a company's earnings for a particular quarter might be due to a correction of an accounting error from prior years. Creative accounting implies there is a motive, and often that it is malicious.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gobonobo ^{T C} 08:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Moovine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (in question) 01:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Isobeef (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (in question) 01:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Bullamacow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (in question) 01:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Land whale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (in question) 04:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated What was I just thinking of (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (in question) 22:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article General average/New version is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General average/New version until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 17:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BITNET MSG. Since you had some involvement with the BITNET MSG redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect I need a miracle. Since you had some involvement with the I need a miracle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). CTJF83 02:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damien Thorn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damien Thorn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sottolacqua (talk) 12:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cask of monte cristo, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Cask of monte cristo and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Cask of monte cristo during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – hysteria18 (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Militant atheism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Militant atheism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teflon (trademark). Since you had some involvement with the Teflon (trademark) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Cnilep (talk) 08:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scared shitless. Since you had some involvement with the Scared shitless redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gardia. Since you had some involvement with the Gardia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect If you want to know what God thinks about money, just look at the people He gives it to. Since you had some involvement with the If you want to know what God thinks about money, just look at the people He gives it to redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SpinningSpark 10:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diversity is an old, old wooden ship that was used during the Civil War era. Since you had some involvement with the Diversity is an old, old wooden ship that was used during the Civil War era redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Satan as a horned and hoofed goat-like monster. Since you had some involvement with the Satan as a horned and hoofed goat-like monster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diversity is an old wooden ship. Since you had some involvement with the Diversity is an old wooden ship redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diversity is an old old wooden ship. Since you had some involvement with the Diversity is an old old wooden ship redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diversity is an old, old wooden ship. Since you had some involvement with the Diversity is an old, old wooden ship redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What's grosser than sweat on Olivia Newton John?. Since you had some involvement with the What's grosser than sweat on Olivia Newton John? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Avec gaz. Since you had some involvement with the Avec gaz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Harry balzac, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 00:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Happy slaves. Since you had some involvement with the Happy slaves redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cumbag. Since you had some involvement with the Cumbag redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 11:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The VIPs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The VIPs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:50, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brother is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brother until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nocturnal Sector. Since you had some involvement with the Nocturnal Sector redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Contra (Swedish magazine). Since you had some involvement with the Contra (Swedish magazine) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Small accident. Since you had some involvement with the Small accident redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bouncy kastle. Since you had some involvement with the Bouncy kastle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –Davey2010^Talk 17:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jumpy castle. Since you had some involvement with the Jumpy castle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –Davey2010^Talk 01:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Prof. Mc. Ewlyahoocom, thanks for creating Buried Alive (performance)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page is written in promotional language, and needs to have a neutral point of view.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to clean it up a bit, could you have a look? 72.188.239.189 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Malankara Jacobite Syrian Orthodox church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.syrianchurch.org/faithandtradition.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Manufactured demand. Since you had some involvement with the Manufactured demand redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 4CT. Since you had some involvement with the 4CT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alternative cook stove. Since you had some involvement with the Alternative cook stove redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Choirmaster. Since you had some involvement with the Choirmaster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Newbiepedian (talk · contribs · X! · logs) 16:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Self-levelling paint. Since you had some involvement with the Self-levelling paint redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Self-leveling paint. Since you had some involvement with the Self-leveling paint redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Heavy boots. Since you had some involvement with the Heavy boots redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pickles Bush. Since you had some involvement with the Pickles Bush redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Laura "Pickles" Bush. Since you had some involvement with the Laura "Pickles" Bush redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dumb criminals. Since you had some involvement with the Dumb criminals redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dumb criminal. Since you had some involvement with the Dumb criminal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Berserker Pirate (Metroid). Since you had some involvement with the Berserker Pirate (Metroid) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pirates in terms of global warming. Since you had some involvement with the Pirates in terms of global warming redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Polar opposite. Since you had some involvement with the Polar opposite redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ToThAc (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Afternoon dress. Since you had some involvement with the Afternoon dress redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Out of sanctuary. Since you had some involvement with the Out of sanctuary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tthhee Ppaarrttyy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tthhee Ppaarrttyy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – The Grid (talk) 03:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Between a rock and a hard place. Since you had some involvement with the Between a rock and a hard place redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BenKuykendall (talk) 20:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kreme. Since you had some involvement with the Kreme redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Essential liberty. Since you had some involvement with the Essential liberty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect That question mark guy. Since you had some involvement with the That question mark guy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:38, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Jackson's Thriller jacket has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Although this subject has been covered by numerous reliable sources (particularly after it was sold at auction a few years ago), I don't think it has been covered in sufficient detail that it requires its own article.

The jacket was created for the music video for Thriller. The description of the jacket’s design and the intent behind the design is already covered in the Michael Jackson's Thriller (music video) article. Information about legacy and impact on fashion can also be covered there.

Some of the claims in the article are less notable than they appear - for example The buyer, Milton Verret, described the jacket as "the greatest piece of rock and roll memorabilia in history”. Verret is the private citizen who bought the jacket so of course he feels that way. The quote about Jackson’s style in the video mentions the jacket only in passing: "In 'Thriller', Michael's outfit and its stylistic features – the wet-look hairstyle, the ankle-cut jeans and the letter 'M' emblazoned on his jacket – reinforce this meta-textual superimposition of role. If Michael, as the male protagonist, is both boyfriend and star, his female counterpart in the equation of 'romance' is both the girlfriend and at this meta-textual level, the fans." Etc.

So - definitely notable, but I think the actual notable stuff can be covered in sufficient depth in Michael Jackson's Thriller (music video). The article is already short and a lot of it is filler. (Cause this is filler, filler night…). Popcornduff (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Popcornduff (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Jackson's Thriller jacket is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jackson's Thriller jacket until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Popcornduff (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Log (wood). Since you had some involvement with the Log (wood) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wood log. Since you had some involvement with the Wood log redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thai langauge. Since you had some involvement with the Thai langauge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Uanfala (talk) 01:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tombstone. Since you had some involvement with the Tombstone redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Technique (song). Since you had some involvement with the Technique (song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Vaffanculo. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#Vaffanculo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Paycheck to paycheck. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 9#Paycheck to paycheck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 15:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1st runner-up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 22#1st runner-up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 22:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1st runner up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#1st runner up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect First runner-up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#First runner-up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect First runner up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#First runner up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Second runner-up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Second runner-up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Second runner up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Second runner up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2nd runner up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#2nd runner up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2nd runner-up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#2nd runner-up until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Xian wei. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 8#Xian wei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 19:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fraternity ring. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 9#Fraternity ring until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 20:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Percipient. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#Percipient until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 17:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Titanic steel. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 12#Titanic steel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect La la la la la la. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27#La la la la la la until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect United station. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 29#United station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Amok. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 23#Amok until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —valereee (talk) 17:08, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Comicon. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 30#Comicon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 23:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect RBI and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#RBI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 19:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dot and Dash and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Dot and Dash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Widget (economics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Magnon, Gabon and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 16#Magnon, Gabon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vertex (topography) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 8#Vertex (topography) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kiss hello and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Kiss hello until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hairy balls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary dab page with three extremely implausible targets; not an aid to navigation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Vix Pervenit: On Usury and Other Dishonest Profit has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 12 § Vix Pervenit: On Usury and Other Dishonest Profit until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Work relief program has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 26 § Work relief program until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect George W’s palace has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 13 § George W’s palace until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 07:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Lamb Chop (The Sheep-Pig) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Lamb Chop (The Sheep-Pig) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aryana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ingratis (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Ingratis (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ewlyahoocom, there is no need to worry about this. The page is marked as G10 due to the actions of a third party, so you should not be held responsible for the attack page. Have a nice day! QwertyForest (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]