User talk:Chetsford/Archive 31

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Chetsford. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 25

←

Archive 29

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

Archive 33

→

Archive 35

Congratulations! With 10,336 views, your Hideaway (U.S. Senate) hook is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of December. Accordingly, it has been included at DYKSTATS December. Even more impressive given that it appeared in a 12-hour queue and was not in the lead/photo slot. Keep up the good work! Cbl62 (talk) 20:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up, Cbl62! To tell you the truth, I'd totally forgot about that one. Chetsford (talk) 07:27, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for closing the RfC at Talk:Chad_Wolf#RfC:_Describing_legal_status_in_lead. Can I ask why you selected option A1? I don't believe any participants in the RfC selected option A. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Oh my goodness, that's embarrassing! It was a copy/paste error by me - I've fixed it in the close. Thanks for calling it out, AleatoryPonderings. Chetsford (talk) 07:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

No problem at all—thanks for the fix :) Cheers, AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 16:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Chetsford, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, ~ El D. (talk to me) 16:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Empire AS ^Talk! 13:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

• I'm confused. Since you're an admin, why are you reporting me rather than just issuing a block yourself? 81.100.37.20 (talk) 20:49, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  • The first instance of vandalism I noticed was on an article in which I was involved. Since the examples of vandalism originating from your address are so aberrant that enough ambiguity exists that they couldn't - in my opinion - be described as "blatant" vandalism, I'm restrained from taking any action myself under WP:UNINVOLVED. Chetsford (talk) 21:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
    • This was undoubtedly because the admin in question neglected to provide a notification on my talk page, but you apparently failed to notice that two of the three edits you listed had already incurred a three-day long block which just expired today. 81.100.37.20 (talk) 21:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
      • I am now in control of all things. Chetsford (talk) 21:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I knew it would cause more confusion than it cured. Worse, I seem to have broken the user-reported vandal section's markup...--Quisqualis (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

No problem, Quisqualis! Chetsford (talk) 23:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Chetsford Greetings I came to know that the page I have created had been deleted by you, I am not satisfied with the reason you gave because it had been clearly stated in Wikipedia that I shouldn’t write an article with exaggeration, so cut short everything then only I submitted.I kindly request you to review it once again.If it is not satisfied then leave a message in my talk page. Grover no 1 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grover no 1 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Grover no 1, thanks for your message. As requested, I have reviewed Aashid. I decline to undo the deletion as I believe it meets the WP:A7 criteria for speedy deletion. You are welcome to appeal this at WP:DRV. Chetsford (talk) 04:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

@Chetsford I have some other citations to prove that the subject in the article has some significance but it is listed that I shouldn’t write something that is promotional.What can I do should I rewrite it once again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grover no 1 (talk • contribs) 05:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

You may want to submit it to WP:AFC. Chetsford (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

@Chetsford Can you review this page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?preload=Template%3AAfc+preload%2Fdraft&editintro=Template%3AAfC+draft+editintro&title=Draft:Aashid&create=Create+new+article+draft#Life_and_Writing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grover no 1 (talk • contribs) 06:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Since I deleted the original page, it would be best for someone else to review it. Please submit it for review via the WP:AFC process. Chetsford (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Mr. Touchdown, U.S.A. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

You are wrong. I am not advocating a cause here as some "soapbox." I write and edit Wikipedia pages with one goal in mind: How best to convey a subject for a nine-year-old kid doing a homework assignment. Specifically, in this case, one thirty years from now. How best do you depict the utter futility of banging your head against a brick wall 60 or more times thinking that it will somehow crumble to dust? How do you explain this Wednesday's riot?

I know there's going to be a riot because my Twitter feed has the "best of Parlor" in it.

The current kerfuffle on the talk page reminds me of Fiddler on the Roof, when Tevya is talking to Havela about her marrying a Gentile. It goes: "on the one hand is this, on the other hand is that, on the first hand is this, on the other hand...there is NO OTHER HAND." The Wikipedia policy on WP: Neutral is on the whole sound. But there is neutral and there is neutral. young Earth creationism or Holocaust denial are not something that neutrality works very well on. This is like that. So I hope you understand where I'm coming from now. Happy New Year and God Bless.Arglebargle79 (talk) 14:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Perhaps you should consider contributing to pages you're somewhat less dispassionate about or in which you feel less personally invested? With no disrespect intended, your comments convey the sense that you're in complete apoplexy about this subject matter and, to be quite honest, I don't understand half of what you're writing. (Also, it's not necessary to reply to me both on the Talk page and here. One or the other is fine. I assure you, everyone is seeing all of your messages. If some of them aren't receiving replies that's probably intentional.) Chetsford (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Re your undo of my edit of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Catherine_Austin_Fitts&oldid=998085937 Catherine Austin Fitts is trending on social media - "Full Interview, Planet Lockdown" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1-0XKYAZII&feature=emb_logo She espouses the conspiracy theory which she has written on her solari web page: https://home.solari.com/deep-state-tactics-101-the-covid-injection-fraud-its-not-a-vaccine/ Saying: that vaccines will contain: "brain-machine interface nanotechnology, digital identity tracking devices, and technology with an expiration date that can be managed and turned off remotely"referring to a report that "indicates that the Danish government and U.S. Navy had been paying a tech company in Denmark to make an injectible chip that would be compatible with one of the leading cryptocurrencies." I noticed her Wiki entry had no reference to these crazy theories. I therefore edited to add the above citing the Solari source. I am therefore surprised that you considered my edit as possible vandalism and using an unreliable source - Solari, despite Solari previously referenced on her Wiki entry Laura Engels (talk) 15:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Per WP:OR you can't independently analyze her claims to determine they're a conspiracy theory. For the record, I agree they are, but you need a RS describing her specific post as a conspiracy theory. "I noticed her Wiki entry had no reference to these crazy theories." We're not here to debunk crazy conspiracy theories. We're chroniclers, not reporters. Per WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS "You might think that it is a great place to set the record straight and right great wrongs, but that's not the case." Once WP:RS describe her claims as a conspiracy theory you should have no problem adding them to the article. Chetsford (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

Guideline and policy news

• Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.

Technical news

• You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.

Arbitration

• By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
• Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.

---

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USRC Surveyor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 04:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey Chetsford! I'm not really allowed to comment in that thread, but I totally agree with your proposal. I can't even count the number times people have tried to use MB/FC at RS/N. Sometimes it's their only source of argument: [1], [2]. I always found it odd that users have tried to use a clearly unreliable source in order to "prove" the reliability or unreliability of other sources. If your proposal gets consensus, might I suggest that you write your header in bold letters and/or a sizeable font? Some editors have a habit of overlooking the warnings posted at the top of noticeboards. Thanks! Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Why not? (You don't have to tell me, I was just idly curious. Somehow I've ended up pretty out-of-the-loop in Wikisociety so I never know what's going on!) Chetsford (talk) 08:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

@Chetsford: I'm in a voluntary I-ban with someone in that thread and I just don't want to cause any problems. Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 08:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Oh got it - good call! Chetsford (talk) 09:01, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of The Myth of the Zodiac Killer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

The article USRC Surveyor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USRC Surveyor for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Djmaschek - very sorry for my delay and thanks very much for the review! I'm going to start working on this shortly. Thanks for your patience. Chetsford (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

I looked the other day and saw you had fixed the map and the material from Allen. It looks like you've done more work since then. Please let me know on the talk page when you are ready. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 05:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Djmaschek. It still needs a bit more work but will be finishing shortly and I'll drop you a note on your Talk page soon. Chetsford (talk) 17:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

• Wettujggvbb (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Abhidcruez (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you please help to create a article

Wettujggvbb (talk) 12:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of The Myth of the Zodiac Killer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 06:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2021 storming of the United States Capitol on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:History of the United States (2008–present) on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello - You reviewed my DYK nom a few days ago, and I was wondering if you had any follow-up feedback on ALT0. Thanks! AviationFreak💬 17:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

No, I don't think so! Chetsford (talk) 20:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

The article USRC Surveyor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USRC Surveyor for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 03:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I m very new to Wikipedia and just made an article on conductor William Garfield Walker. I included several articles from Newspapers and other sources including about a House resolution that passed calling him a "musical genius" however you rejected the article citing that he is not accomplished enough. Could you please explain? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musiclover12345678 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Musiclover12345678 - just to clarify, it's not that he's not accomplished enough, it's that there wasn't a demonstration of sufficient WP:Notability. There are two ways a conductor would meet Notability, either through the WP:GNG or by meeting the criteria listed WP:MUSICBIO. In both cases, this needs to be demonstrated by sources actually in the article. Please let me know if you have any questions! Chetsford (talk) 22:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! I have gone back and added a halfhour interview feature which was produced by and aired on PBS to his article and have also added another Newspaper source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musiclover12345678 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Arbitration

• The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people, replacing the 1932 cutoff.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!

---

Hello! Your submission of Mr. Touchdown, U.S.A. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Hong Kong people of Lower Yangtze descent on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Edge3 (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

TJMSmith

Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

Interface administrator changes

AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
• A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
• A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect.
• A request for comment asks if sysops may place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions?
• There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.

Technical news

• When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
• When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
• There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

• By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions.
• The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.

---

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Crusading on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
• Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

• When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
• Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration

• A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.

---

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hamdi Ulukaya on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

Administrator changes

Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes

Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
• The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.

Technical news

• The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

Arbitration

• The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.

---

Thanks for uploading File:Chamber of Progress logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liz Cheney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Republic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Chetsford. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 25

←

Archive 29

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

Archive 33

→

Archive 35