User:TexasAndroid

This user is a WikiGnome.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Computer programmer from San Antonio, Texas.

Reverter of vandalism, and wiki-link cleaner. (I'm no great author of Wiki pages, but I'm good at cleaning up other people's messes. :))

My barnstar collection is here.

Current Projects

This user has been on Wikipedia for 19 years, 6 months and 27 days.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.
This editor is a WikiGnome.
♂This user is male.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Categories
to improve Wikipedia categorization.
This user has created a global account.
(-o-) This user plays the Pokémon RPGs and other related video games.
719 This user has owned 719 species of Pokémon in Pokémon X.
This user uses Google Maps.
This editor is a
Master Editor IV
and is entitled to display this
Orichalcum Editor Star.

100k+

Current Outstanding admin load

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 73
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 116
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 79
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 14
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 40
Requested RD1 redactions 5
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 24
Open sockpuppet investigations 27
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports

User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 5
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 3
Importance or significance not asserted 4
Possibly contested candidates 3
Other candidates 12
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 31 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

  • PuppetmasterDK (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Sorry if this is a waste of time. Is this name allowed?. Knitsey (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. I don't really see why this would be unambiguously offensive, disruptive, or otherwise a problem. Yes, it could be a reference to sockpuppetry, but there's more than enough room for doubt on that interpretation that WP:AGF guides against blocking. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks for replying Red-tailed hawk, I wasn't too sure. Knitsey (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbcom: India Pakistan articles. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 01:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi Heyaaaaalol, contrary to the very similarly named WP:ARBPIA, the WP:ARBIPA area has no automatic extended-confirmed protection. There has been some disruptive editing in the history of this article, but no recent incident. Is there a specific reason for requesting this today? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: There is a high level of IP vandalism occurring. The season’s grand finale has not yet concluded, but the winner and runner-up statuses are being deliberately altered. IP addresses are misleading information about the winners and runner ups.

Despite repeated attempts to undo the changes, persistent disruptive edits from IP addresses continue. I had raised this request yesterday but did not properly convey the extent of the problem caused by those edits. MySlack1222 (talk) 03:13, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:18, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBECR. Skitash (talk) 14:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. As he is the head of the government in Bangladesh, this article is at risk of adding poorly sourced and biased info, so extended confirmed protection will prevent that. At least 1 year of protection will be good enough for now. Thanks. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 14:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Multiple reverts made by IP 37.155.40.206 Mr.User200 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Several editions by IPs, which has been reverted by several users. [1] [2] [3] [4] HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last week. Xexerss (talk) 14:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Especially given the popularity of the term recently among Gen Z. jolielover♥talk 16:49, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Sockpuppetry by page-banned user. Borgenland (talk) 17:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It is suspected based on edit summaries that the subject is sending people he knows personally to turn this article into his resume. Jalen Barks (Woof) 18:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jalen Barks (Woof) 18:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon vandalism. Woodroar (talk) 18:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive edits, removal sourced content and possible sock evasions by the infamous vandal sockmaster User:Kairakairav. Extended protection would be better as the sock can easily edit other articles and gain auto confirmed status. Since, I have wikibreak enforcer on, I wouldn't be able to such edits afterwards. 2409:40D0:2B:1C58:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 18:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – anonymous editor (IP regularly changes, but always located in Germany) repeatedly changes content without consensus, and not supported by sources - including wording within quotes from reliable sources within article. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 18:58, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Multiple pre-mature news reports reports about his death which have been since been debunked. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/tabla-legend-zakir-hussain-critical-we-ask-for-prayers-says-nephew-7255719 Xoocit (talk) 19:18, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wiiformii (talk) 19:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Pinging @El C. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.

The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,

Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.

I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥  01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
ExtIPA is IPA. It's just a specialized subset. For example, extIPA can be used in the 'Illustrations of the IPA' published in JIPA.
The issue is one of font support. The letters in question date to 2015, though they weren't added to Unicode until 2021. There are websites that list fonts that support various characters. These are supported by the SIL fonts, which are the best free IPA fonts available. If you don't have a good font installed, you're not going to be able to view IPA correctly anyway. That's why we have the IPA notice in articles, that you may need to install an IPA font to view the article properly. — kwami (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Change 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[43] to 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[42]

Source 42 has these numbers and source 43 doesn't Alderman pained dios finnish (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Js (request) 2024-12-12 22:26 Fully protected (log) Protected by Lupin on 2006-01-25: "javascript template"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
15 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Designation (request) 2024-12-03 05:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Chem2 (request) 2024-12-03 23:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2021-08-18: "High risk template."
Module:Authority control/config (request) 2024-12-05 20:48 Template-protected (log) Modified by Favonian on 2022-12-25: "High-risk Lua module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Nihongo (request) 2024-12-06 16:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-11-26: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Expand language (request) 2024-12-07 12:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Anomie on 2013-11-17: "Allow templateeditors to edit, per WT:RFPP#Mass protection lowering from "sysop" to "editprotected" (script-assisted edit)"
Template:Infobox organization (request) 2024-12-07 23:32 Template-protected (log) Protected by Wugapodes on 2020-04-12: "Highly visible template: Restore protection after undeletion"
Template:Draft article (request) 2024-12-08 09:00 Template-protected (log) Protected by Gogo Dodo on 2015-05-02: "Highly visible template"
Template:Tracked/styles.css (request) 2024-12-09 11:39 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2021-02-17: "Highly visible template: match parent"
Template:Country data Syria (request) 2024-12-09 17:46 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:DYK tools (request) 2024-12-10 19:58 Template-protected (log) Protected by Hut 8.5 on 2016-12-22: "Highly visible template"
Template:Template for discussion/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) Protected by Anthony Appleyard on 2016-10-30: ""
Template:Tfm/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) From Template:Tfm/dated: Protected by Ged UK on 2013-11-12: "Highly visible template"
Template:Asbox/styles.css (request) 2024-12-13 23:02 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2021-03-05: "Highly visible template; requested at WP:RfPP: Special:Permalink/1010366818#Template:Asbox/styles.css"
Template:Country data Gibraltar (request) 2024-12-15 11:05 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox German place (request) 2024-12-15 12:52 Template-protected (log) From Template:Infobox German location: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Hog Farm 2 77 1 5 99 02:47, 22 December 2024 6 days, 6 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 20:23, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

There are no outstanding requests for account creator.

Account creator

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

I have created 400+ well-sourced articles on military, history, literature, politics, and academia, including recent BLPs. I believe i meet the criteria for autopatrolled rights. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 08:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Pinging Joe Roe and Xaosflux, who responded to a similar request by this user in October of this year. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:25, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
See also the discussion on their recent NPR request. – Joe (talk) 09:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser


Hi, I am re-requesting AWB perms. It was last denied because I had shown zero need for it but this time, I think I do have a reason.

I had recently created Niagara (electoral district) and Middlesex North from a (redirect) to a Disambiguation page, and it has links. I would like to use AWB to update the links, and make it point to the right pages. I'm thinking there could be more "redirect-to-disambigaution" pages that would need updating links. Crafterstar (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 19:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Seems reasonable to me. Will give Dr vulpes a chance to opine before granting. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Looks good to me, I'll review their work and report back. Thank you @Pppery for the ping. Dr vulpes (Talk) 09:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to have AWB permission to do simple maintenance edits, like fixing typos or fixing links to disambiguation pages, more easily. Milo8505 (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

{{not done}} Fails minimum criteria. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
@Pppery Sorry, could you inform me of the criteria? I thought it was 500 total main space edits or 250 non-automated mainspace edits, which I pass, as I have more than 500 total mainspace edits.
Thank you and sorry for the inconveniences.
Milo8505 (talk) 08:53, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
No, you read it correctly and I interpreted the information I was looking at wrongly. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:51, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
So then, can I have it? Milo8505 (talk) 09:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
I haven't made any decision on that yet. My future self or a different admin will decide. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights To improve the references for the page Flint water crisis. Emannnt (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You seem to have no idea what you are doing. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:51, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
To elaborate on this, AWB is only helpful for editing several different pages in succession, not for editing a single page. SilverLocust 💬 04:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Plan to use this to mass create and categorize redirects, as well as mass tagging pages with {{long comment}}. mwwv converseedits 14:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

Reason for requesting confirmed rights: Been contributing for wikipedia. Confirming my account will motivate me to contribute more to this space. UMAGPR (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

 Already done – You are already autoconfirmed. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 08:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. I understand the importance of maintaining trust and adhering to Wikipedia’s policies, and I’ve since reflected on how to better contribute responsibly.

Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 300 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Wikipedia’s standards, and enhancing article quality.

I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing.

Examples of Recent Contributions: Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter, which are in my area of expertise. Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:15, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([7]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([8]). MusikBot talk 12:30, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

This is my alternative account that I will use in public WiFi connections. Would like to edit ECP and semi-protected pages on this account, if possible. Thanks in advance! quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 19:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for file mover

File mover

Vulcan would like to be able to rename files and to help others in doing so. Already have similar role in Commons. Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: I just declined ~15 of the requests made by the requestor because they do not meet our local requirements to be eligible for renaming. Among the worst offenders were File:Snowfall.gif and File:New Scientist.jpg; neither are completely meaningless, thus they do clearly do not meet WP:FNC#2. I imagine our criteria differs from commons, as I am unfamiliar with their system there. I would recommend that the candidate be asked to take some more time and demonstrate a better understanding of local file renaming procedure before granting a request here. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 20:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose as Godsy says, and given the note that I left them on the talk-page. I'd advise them to gain more experience in the area, and contribute elsewhere? Additionally, most of their rename requests recently were out of the question, here and both per Commons (adding this as Godsy said, they aren't aware of how file renaming works on Commons). ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose - Agreed, and thank you both. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done per above. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Hi! I'd love to help out with the backlog. I have around ~40 AfD !votes, and I'm usually one of the first votes and always use strong guideline-backed reasoning. I've only had 1 AfD in the "red" cell of AfD Stats, that was a bio of a person from a non-English speaking country, and I tried to find sources in my WP:BEFORE, but nothing come up, and then another user more familiar with that country was able to dig something up so I withdrew (I don't think it should count as a black mark against me). I've also reviewed a lot of AfC submissions (a good amount of them sadly don't show in the AfC tool as they were later deleted, but there's still a decent chunk in there), and I almost always provide personalized advice backed with good reasoning when declining. You can find my CSD log here (n. 10, 100% success): User:MolecularPilot/CSD_Log, and I've also created 5 articles (see my user page), 4 of which are B class. Thanks for your time! :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 05:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Adding that I'm also very experienced in cleaning formatting, copy editing, wiki linking etc. as I often do that before accepting AfC submissions, and for evidence of criteria #3 about being kind to new users, I think I've helped a good amount of users understand policies/guidelines/reasons for AfC declines etc, a small subset of these can by verified on my user talk page and I'm also very active on the help IRC (admittedly less during the last week due to a personal event). I'm also knowledgable about copyvios, having cleaned a decent amount, informing users about our policy, answering any questions they sent to me and requesting revdel. I've also reviewed around 20 cases on CopyPatrol. Thanks again for your time :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 05:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
 Done. I'll note that your AfD record is in the "so good it's suspicious" range and I was very pleased to see the well-thought out rationales and participation behind the !votes, with little to no votestacking involved. signed, Rosguill talk 17:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to help contribute reduce the large backlog of unreviewed new pages. I've been an active AFC reviewer for a while. I've contributed to and created dozens of articles that are still live to date. ANUwrites 06:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 17:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

After I was granted the right some weeks ago, I have been reviewing new articles and since it expires in 6 days, I would like to request for an extension Tesleemah (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([9]). MusikBot talk 21:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Noting that someone has privately expressed concerns about this user as an AfC reviewer / NPP. I'm not personally up for a deep dive at the moment, but I wanted to mention it so that the processing admin can make sure to be thorough with a review. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
I know Wiki to be an open space, except confidential, I believe concerns about my AFC review/NPP should be publicly expressed. You might as well attach links here if possible. Tesleemah (talk) 05:42, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Private communications are allowed. I simply made a note to encourage a thorough review before granting, based on some feedback I received. If I had time to investigate myself I would have, but I wanted to respond because it popped up on my watch list. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

I'm short of 3,000 edits requirement (currently at 2,400). I request page-moving rights as I'm encountering problems when reviewing new pages. Specifically, I face issues leaving redirects to (bad) pages I move to the draft space. Page-moving rights would help prevent redirects from being flagged for speedy deletion. ANUwrites 13:29, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 2377 total edits. MusikBot talk 13:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
@Anuwrites: If you use the MoveToDraft script, it will automatically tag the move redirect for deletion, at which point it takes little work for an admin to check and delete the redirect (with no additional work for you). The script will also show a warning if you try draftifying an article within an hour of its last edit despite WP:NPPHOUR, as happened in this move yesterday. And it will leave a notification on the talk page of the article's creator, which you should be doing as explained at WP:DRAFTNOTIFY. Based on that, there isn't sufficient cause to make an exception to the guidelines for granting, plus your draftifications could still do with checking.  Not done. SilverLocust 💬 16:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

I monitor recent edits to combat vandalism and improve articles, I also act on drafts, I have a good knowledge of Wikipedia rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an active patroller of recent changes and quite often see awaiting pending changes; I would like to receive the permission to accept/deny changes. I also have a track record of reverting vandalism. jolielover♥talk 06:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

While I do not usually seek out new or pending changes, I do occasionally bumble into them and I could relatively easily clear them when I find them. ✶Quxyz 16:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S.: as a sure guarantee my use of rollback is done safely and without causing any significant issue, I'll use Mr. Stradivarius' ConfirmRollback. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
2601AC47, a confirmation click before rollback has become a feature that doesn't need userscripts anymore. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This permission will help me in combating vandalism. I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes, always warning users when necessary, assuming good faith, and taking full responsibility for all my edits. I also do crosswiki patrolling and recently joined the SWMT. — Jet Pilot (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Note: User changed their name from Tres Libras to Jet Pilot since submitting this request. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, that's true. Jet Pilot (talk) 22:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:15, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I had been actively patrolling RC in 2023 but paused for a long time since I was too busy. I plan to resume soon and would like rollback rights to make it easier. However, I mostly edit on my school computer so I am unable to use any tools such as Huggle, RedWarn, etc. Thank you for considering my request.

Note from 07:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC): I had just been informed that RedWarn can be used on a school computer, so it's very likely that I will be using it. xRozuRozuteacups 23:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I have been reverting vandalism by undoing edits, warning users, and monitoring several pages to keep them protected. Rollback rights would make my efforts faster and more efficient. I am familiar with WP:VANDAL. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 07:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

I have been reverting vandalism since I created my account. Although it appears I am a new user, I also have experience editing Wikipedia and reverting vandalism as an IP for many years (which I will not be disclosing due to security concerns). The rollback right will help me revert vandalism faster, which is why I am requesting it. PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

PersonAccount, to be honest, no, it doesn't appear you are a new user. Which is okay if all previous activity was without having an account and without disruption. It will take longer than for other users until the trust for manually granting permissions is there in your case. It isn't yet, to me. Unless someone else grants rollback in the next week or so, I'll decline this with a recommendation not to ask for permissions until your account is a year old. Regarding rollback in particular, Twinkle and Ultraviolet will do just fine. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

I am finally starting to have a WP:CLUE, though I still deserve a good whack to the face with some WP:TROUT more often than I would like. While redwarn/UV is nice, it is not very fast to load diffs in the browser the way that I do at the moment (it is surprisingly resource intensive), and I think Huggle would help quite a bit along with reducing mistakes made as diffs would be clearer with less lag and more efficient resource usage. I have made mistakes, and will continue to make mistakes, but I find myself leaving more and more diffs untouched now that I realize more often when I don't have a WP:CLUE. Any advice is welcome, and advice on if I should still be using RedWarn or if there is some reason I should switch to UV would be welcome as well.  💬 04:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Being able to mass-rollback would've come in handy the last few days when dealing with cleaning up after an editor who had made a mess with adding copyvio images across a large number of articles (on multiple occasions). It was suggested that I requesting the rights for handling it easier in future. RachelTensions (talk) 05:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done charlotte 👸🎄 06:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I'm quite active in the Recent Changes, and having the rollback feature would make reverting vandalism easier and quicker. jolielover♥talk 07:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

I'm revert vandalism again, to use AntiVandal and Ultraviolet. after Fastily retirement. I'm have more 200 reverts last 4 months, and I'm meet all requirements. declined requests:

  1. [10] The account age 2 weeks.
  2. [11] You need wait 1 month.
  3. [12] Please see 3rd, decline reason.
Thanks. ~🌀 Ampil 💬 / 📝 08:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)


    Immediate requests

    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 77
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 24
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1

    Deletion

    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 484
    Templates for deletion 97
    Categories for deletion 93
    Wikipedia files for discussion 47
    All redirects for discussion 262
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 13
    Possible copyright violations 12
    All articles proposed for deletion 292
    All files proposed for deletion 44
    Unsorted AfD debates 1
    All files with the same name on Commons 31
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 329
    Unknown copyright status 52
    Unknown source 79
    No non-free use rationale 2
    Replaceable non-free use images 14
    Disputed non-free use images 30

    Page protection

    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,238
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 440
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,347
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,133 0.49
    All articles needing rewrite 6,006 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,330 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 40,007 0.58

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,142 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 535,397 7.73
    All articles lacking sources 71,500 1.03
    All unreferenced BLPs 9 0
    All articles needing additional references 474,786 6.86
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,616 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,494 1.52
    All articles with dead external links 315,172 4.55

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 138 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 19 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,091 0.02
    All articles to be split 815 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 2 -
    Stub categories 19,272 -
    All uncategorized pages 653 0.01
    All orphaned articles 52,915 0.76
    All articles needing copy edit 2,420 0.03
    All articles with style issues 19,586 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,761 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,495 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    Category Entries
    Requested moves 448
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,337
    All accuracy disputes 15,754
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 0
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 5
    All articles to be expanded 66,001

    Special pages

    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links