Pashtuns: Revision history

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

29 July 2024

27 July 2024

18 July 2024

17 July 2024

15 July 2024

10 July 2024

9 July 2024

8 July 2024

30 June 2024

22 June 2024

18 June 2024

17 June 2024

  • curprev 21:2421:24, 17 June 2024‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ 190,258 bytes +1,104‎ Rescuing orphaned refs ("The Hindu" from rev 1229610462; "CanfieldPaleczek" from rev 1229610470) Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 19:1919:19, 17 June 2024‎ House-of-Nashir talk contribs‎ m 189,154 bytes −195‎ Moderators must provide a census record to prove that these communities exist. Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 19:1719:17, 17 June 2024‎ House-of-Nashir talk contribs‎ m 189,349 bytes −504‎ On page 148 of this book, the author states his theory that 100,000 Pashtuns migrated to Rohilkhand. This is a massive claim as migrations are major historical events, but this author uses the word "perhaps", meaning he has nothing more than claim. He does not provide any historical documentation, nor does he provide a census. Therefore this nothing more than a weak claim which cannot be used as evidence. To say "many" Pashtuns live there requires a census record to prove, which is not provided. Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 19:1319:13, 17 June 2024‎ House-of-Nashir talk contribs‎ m 189,853 bytes −650‎ This source is nothing more than a weak news article. The article states a bunch of non sense. It does not provide a single source, neither primary sources nor secondary. It does not provide any government record or decree and there are no other articles with similar claims. This is nothing more than a propaganda piece, and it must show proof that this indeed occurred. It has no source and therefore is weak, and does not deserve to be cited. Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 19:1319:13, 17 June 2024‎ Fylindfotberserk talk contribs‎ 190,503 bytes +167‎ Adding URL Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 19:1119:11, 17 June 2024‎ Fylindfotberserk talk contribs‎ 190,336 bytes +853‎ Restored revision 1229604811 by House-of-Nashir (talk): While I agree with some of your removal, Many of teh otehrs are well sourced. You need to seek WP:CONSENSUS in teh talk page first. This si longstanding. Your claims are untrue in a lot of places. Teh quotes actually mention what is supported Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
  • curprev 19:0819:08, 17 June 2024‎ House-of-Nashir talk contribs‎ m 189,483 bytes +504‎ On page 148 of this book, the author states his theory that 100,000 Pashtuns migrated to Rohilkhand. This is a massive claim as migrations are major historical events, but this author uses the word "perhaps", meaning he has nothing more than claim. He does not provide any historical documentation, nor does he provide a census. Therefore this nothing more than a weak claim which cannot be used as evidence. To say "many" Pashtuns live there requires a census record to prove, which is not provided. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • curprev 19:0719:07, 17 June 2024‎ House-of-Nashir talk contribs‎ 188,979 bytes −504‎ On page 148 of this book, the author states his theory that 100,000 Pashtuns migrated to Rohilkhand. This is a massive claim as migrations are major historical events, but this author uses the word "perhaps", meaning he has nothing more than claim. He does not provide any historical documentation, nor does he provide a census. Therefore this nothing more than a weak claim which cannot be used as evidence. To say "many" Pashtuns live there requires a census record to prove, which is not provided. Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 18:5918:59, 17 June 2024‎ House-of-Nashir talk contribs‎ m 189,483 bytes −345‎ This is a bold claim, however the westminster review itself does not provide any evidence to prove it. It requires documentation and statistics to prove this indeed happened, but it provides nothing. Therefore this source cannot be relied upon. The governments of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India or independent organizations must research this topic. Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 18:4818:48, 17 June 2024‎ House-of-Nashir talk contribs‎ m 189,828 bytes −508‎ On page 18 of this book, this claim is not substantiated. The primary sources and secondary sources, such as the british library, india office records are available in the book. However this specific claim does not cite any evidence from those sources, either primary or secondary. Therefore this book should be replaced with a more credibly source with no obvious bias, which properly cites its claims. Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 18:3518:35, 17 June 2024‎ House-of-Nashir talk contribs‎ m 190,336 bytes −448‎ This article is a weak source. It is a mere anecdote and does not provide any evidence. In order to substantiate this claim, the article must provide stats and census data, however it provides absolutely nothing. Anecdote is a weak argument and does not prove anything. Therefore this must be removed. Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 18:0018:00, 17 June 2024‎ House-of-Nashir talk contribs‎ 190,784 bytes −333‎ The article referenced as a "proof" for hindu Pashtuns/pathans is a weak source. It is a propaganda news article, which itself provides no evidence. There is no proof provided that those 3 women in the picture are pashtuns or speak pashto and there is no evidence that this was the purpose of karzais visit, as there are no other articles available on this supposed meeting. In order to prove that hindu pathans exist, there must be a census record provided, so i ask the moderators to add one. Tag: Reverted

13 June 2024

4 June 2024

2 June 2024

24 May 2024

17 May 2024

24 April 2024

16 April 2024

13 April 2024

12 April 2024

30 March 2024

29 March 2024

28 March 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pashtuns"