Talk:Call to action (marketing)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2012

--Fmjohnson (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)This is a terrible entry. The concept of a call to action is as old as direct marketing. It predates the Web by more than 100 years.[reply]

Requested move 23 January 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) -- Calidum 00:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Call to action (marketing) → Call to action – WP:DIFFCAPS says that capitalization is adequate disambiguation, therefore there is no confusion between this topic and Call to Action that a hatnote can't solve. Elizium23 (talk) 17:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was inclined to support, but after looking into the issue a bit, I think that we are missing an article on the broader concept of a call to action as a statement designed to stir listeners to take steps to address an identified problem. The article as it stands is really not even about the general concept in marketing, but only the use with reference to websites. bd2412 T 00:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - same concern as User talk:BD2412, plus I am wondering if call to action (website) would be a better title for the current article. It doesn't cover call to action (fundraising) for example. A dab page call to action (disambiguation) should also include the 1976 Catholic conference Call to Action etc, plus Jimmy Carter's A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence, and Power 2014 book ...seriously no article? if the president had only written a vampire cowboy comic it'd have an article for sure, much more encyclopaedic ;). In ictu oculi (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "call to action" should become a disambiguation page, and also list uses for "A Call To Action" -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 09:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Plural of the abbreviation

If 'passersby' is the plural of 'passerby', should then not the plural of 'CTA' be 'CsTA'? Oliver Gramberg (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cnv

Y un f 177.236.32.15 (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xhhrhrh

Dhdhehjd 2806:2F0:3200:3483:B92D:DC3B:B172:B850 (talk) 03:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]