Talk:Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Detsom (talk | contribs) at 23:48, 31 January 2024 (→‎Requested move 25 January 2024: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Requested move 26 December 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 06:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



2023 Israel–Lebanon border conflict2023 Israel–Hezbollah conflict – At the onset of hostilities, the conflict was limited to the Israel-Lebanon border but since then, both Israel and Hezbollah deepened their strikes, stretching beyond the border area. Additionally, IDF is operating deep inside Syria, not just around the Golan Heights. With that in mind, I think it would suitable to find a new name for the article, I think 2023 Israel–Hezbollah conflict would be suitable. Other suggestions are also welcome. Ecrusized (talk) 12:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst I do agree that the conflict has expanded from the Lebanese border, it is worth also acknowledging that the fighting is definitely not just between Israel and Hezbollah. Numerous other groups have also entered and have been actively fighting against Israel. Perhaps a more fitting name would be something along the lines of “2023 Northern Israel Conflict”, or “2023 Israel—Lebanon/Syria Conflict”. IiSmxyzXX (talk) 21:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think 2023 Israel–Hezbollah conflict is a fine name but we also got to think about the name based on other groups involved in the conflict so maybe something like Israel–Lebanon conflict (2023-Present), Northern Israel Conflict (2023-present), South Lebanon conflict (2023-Present), 2023-2024 Shebaa Farms conflict, 2023-2024 Levant Conflict, or something else, also since 2023 is almost over maybe it’s better to move it to 2023-2024 Israel–Hezbollah conflict, Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023-Present), or Israel–Lebanon conflict (2023-present) HuntersHistory (talk) 00:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - indeed though Hezbollah party is part of the Lebanese government, the Republic of Lebanon is not (yet) directly participating in fighting vs Israel. 2023 Israel–Lebanon border conflict is correct, but Israel-Hezbollah conflict is the most correct naming term and in line with sources like [1].GreyShark (dibra) 16:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. It isn't possible to tell the whole story in the title, but the proposed version is closer to the facts than the current version. The only other possibility I see is to note that the border is indeed the Israel–Lebanon border, so we could have something like "2003 conflict at the Israel–Lebanon border". Zerotalk 03:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Now that it’s 2024 maybe 2023-2024 Israel–Hezbollah conflict or Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023-Present) because the conflict is ongoing and 2023 is over. HuntersHistory (talk) 05:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeSupport: Since the current conflict isn't only taking place the Lebanon-Israel border. Or how about a more descriptive one like 2023 Israel–Hamas war spillover in Lebanon and Syria Prodrummer619 (talk) 10:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"2023 Israel–Hamas war spillover in Lebanon and Syria" would be preferable to Israel-Hezbollah conflict. VR talk 17:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: No longer limited to borders and limited strikes.--Sakiv (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support As Israel starts to attack Hezbollah inside Lebanon, this couldn't be just a border conflict.
Wendylove (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

W:I brought this up farther down with the creation of the page Hamas in Lebanon and the escalating conflict with the creation of the Al-Aqsa Flood Vanguards, the Assassination of Saleh al Arouri, and Mark Regev saying "this was not an attack on the Lebanese state ... Whoever did this did a surgical strike against the Hamas leadership". I wonder if a page should be created called something like 2023-2024 Palestinian insurgency in South Lebanon or Hamas insurgency in South Lebanon and some of the stuff be merged there much like how the PLO in Lebanon page is connected to the Palestinian insurgency in South Lebanon and the 1982 Lebanon War and I like the decision of calling this article the 2023-2024 Hezbollah–Israel conflict. HuntersHistory (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Post-move discussion

Now that it has been moved to "2023 Israel-Hezbollah conflict", we should probably remove conflict that doesn't strictly relate to Hezbollah, such as Israeli airstrikes on Iranian and Syrian military targets. Will we also limit this article to 2023, and not include any 2024 events? VR talk 05:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

biased wording not supported by source

"The IDF fired warning shots and used riot dispersal means at 18 people, including journalists and parliamentarians that crossed the border from Lebanon and walked 80 meters into Israeli territory.[42]" — as the cited article says, they walked into israeli-occupied disputed territory, not unambiguously israeli territory 130.180.88.101 (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should there maybe be a new page because of Hamas in Lebanon.

W With the creation of the page Hamas in Lebanon and the escalating conflict I wounder if a page should be created called something like 2023-2024 Palestinian insurgency in South Lebanon or Hamas insurgency in South Lebanon and some of the stuff be merged there much like how the PLO in Lebanon page is connected to the Palestinian insurgency in South Lebanon and the 1982 Lebanon War HuntersHistory (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 January 2024

In the latest hezbollah infographic on November 23, they claimed 354 israel soldiers wounded/killed on the border. 185.118.220.5 (talk) 10:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. RetroCosmos (talk) 17:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 January 2024 (2)

Per Hezbollah: 120 killed/wounded Should be 354 killed/wounded 185.118.220.5 (talk) 10:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Borgenland (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct the Hezbollah retaliation to Saleh Al Arouri's assasination.

Hezbollah confirmed launching 62 rockets towards an israeli air command center in mount meron.

Add that info and correct the mistakes made, also correct the fact that this is an initial response, as stated by Hezbollah.

The people who have rights to edit this article should 1rst and foremost look at Hezbollah's statements if they write about their operations, all info necessary will be found there. 80.220.74.143 (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add Amal movement units and leader

Add afwaj mokawama lobnaniya amal for the military units involved and the commander nabih berri since everyday includes a lot of rocket firing from them to israel Moudb (talk) 19:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2,000 Israeli casualties according to Hezbollah

I think this should be removed because the claim is exaggerated. Any party can assert any amount of unattributed claims against their opponents. Ecrusized (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with editor @Genabab:'s comments here [5]. NBC is considered an RS. And as long as the claim is properly attributed to Hezbollah for the reader to understand there is no reason to remove it. EkoGraf (talk) 20:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't doubt the reliability of NBC News..... I doubt that Hezbollah is a reliable source. Ecrusized (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As Genabab said himself, it is most likely not true. However, we still include claims of all belligerents in a conflict for the sake of NPOV balance, presenting all sides POV. Like we have included over in the main Israel-Hamas conflict article the mention of Israel's claim they killed 1,000 militants in those first days within Israel, or like we include both Ukraine's and Russia's claims of their enemies losses over at the Russia-Ukraine war article (all figures that are more than likely inflated for the sake of propaganda), EkoGraf (talk) 21:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree that its probably not true, but deciding that, is not Wikipedia's job. Really, as long as NBC (a rs) is saying "Hezbollah claimed this" that's reason enough to include it. But only if we do say 'claimed by' Hezbollah. since other groups like the IDF are denying it. Genabab (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shot at house

https://mobile.mako.co.il/news-military/2024_q1/Article-963b7a378480d81026.htm?sCh=31750a2610f26110&pId=173113802 2.55.167.54 (talk) 17:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 January 2024

Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present)Israel–Hezbollah War (2023–present) – If the 2,000 casualties per Hezbollah is true should this be moved to Israel–Hezbollah War (2023–present) because that would be enough deaths to be considered a war and I think we should discuss this. HuntersHistory (talk) 22:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (for now) - If reliable sources start calling it a war, then we can change it, as per WP:COMMONNAME. At the moment, I haven't seen sources calling it a war. EkoGraf (talk) 23:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not described as a war by RS. Ecrusized (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I respect the points raised, but I'd like to offer a different perspective. Even if some sources hesitate to use the term "war", the conflict's characteristics (casualties, sustained military engagement, regional implications) arguably align more closely with traditional definitions of war than a lower-intensity conflict. We should consider these tangible factors, in addition to labels, when assessing the conflict's nature. Media outlets, particularly in the West, can sometimes be slow to adopt terms like "war" due to legal and political sensitivities. This reluctance shouldn't prevent us from using the most accurate descriptor as the situation develops. While "conflict" is technically accurate, it risks downplaying the severity of the situation. "War", while carrying its own connotations, offers a more precise and informative title. Detsom (talk) 23:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What to do about the 2 dead search-and-rescuers?

So far, we have been unable to come up with an effective solution for where, in the casualties section, to place the two Hezbollah-linked dead search-and-rescuers. I, provisionally, put them apart from Hezbollah casualties, but they were then merged with the Hezbollah casualties. The issue is that RS do not merge these counts, making our total Hezbollah death count 2 higher than those in RS. Because of this, they were removed recently from the Hezbollah death toll, but are now simply absent entirely. This needs to be fixed, as the lack of these two deaths means that our conflict-total is off by two. What should be done about this issue? TheAwesomeAtom (talk) 19:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Search-and-rescuers are civilians, not combatants, and should be counted as civilians. EkoGraf (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aight, fair enough. TheAwesomeAtom (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Al manar

https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/bk5ryxqca 2A00:A041:1CE0:0:E139:30F8:BF3:D3FE (talk) 23:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 January 2024

https://www.alnour.com.lb/news/ordinary/75020/%D9%81%D8%B6%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87-%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%B4-%D9%85%D8%B9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%87%D9%88%D8%AF-%D9%88%D9%86%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B6-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B8%D9%84%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%8A

See link above that contradicts the text in quotation currently present in this article, I quote Hezbollah not only opposes the government and policies of the State of Israel, but also each and every Jewish civilian who lives in Israel.

FadlAllah and other religious leaders have always stated that there is no animosity to jews , but that they oppose Zionism, you can read it in the link I've attached above, and you can find other examples. The manifesto mentioned in the wikipedia article and the personality being quoted, is not a media relation director as mentioned in link 36 . Also most of the links are not from Hezbollah or neutral sources, but sources who are in conflict with the movement, I would hence encourage links that are neutral, and if this is not available then at least add a counter link that can contradict the opposing link. Accusation such as Hezbollah or other movements oppose Jews in general are serious. You should take example on your Hezbollah article in the arabic language that has a whole section dedicated on how Hezbollah view jews see below https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A3%D9%8A%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%84%D9%88%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%A7_%D8%AD%D8%B2%D8%A8_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87 Abysmalwinger (talk) 23:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: I've modified that line to specify the time frame, but I'm not clear on how the person in the source is related to Hezbollah, as it doesn't mention Hezbollah in the source. The Arabic Wikipedia article you linked to seems to be a translation of our article on the same topic at Ideology of Hezbollah. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 18:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]