Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Only make links that are relevant to the context/Archive 7" on Wikipedia
- extremes is the issue. I think we should go back to basics, and stick to the fram of "only make links that are relevant to the context." So in context, an article...243 KB (36,549 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- disliked all the years in Wikipedia being linked. Tempshill 23:06, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Make only links relevant to the context is not policy...36 KB (5,927 words) - 20:46, 6 March 2008
- a rephrase to "the most relevant" along with a guideline that a moderate number of links should be used, but the intent is the same. Daniel Quinlan 05:15...10 KB (714 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- violate Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context in that linking up such dates will not be relevant to the article's context or aid or facilitate...129 KB (19,290 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking (redirect from Only make links that are relevant to the context)the context in the article, the following are usually not linked. I guess it's my perspective that geographic situation is often relevant to context for...190 KB (26,086 words) - 10:47, 13 August 2024
- link to potato in this article? It is a just common term with no particular relationship to the article on Wikipedia:Make only links relevant to the context...39 KB (6,160 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context#What should not be linked to Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context#Specific...40 KB (6,429 words) - 18:32, 25 August 2006
- are the Ori 23:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC) It seems to me that links shouldn't be included in quotations unless they were in the original material (or are included...4 KB (682 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- governing links currently call only for links that “are helpful to the understanding of the article or its context.” Anything beyond that just increases...154 KB (22,021 words) - 18:40, 3 March 2023
- 16:32, August 10, 2005 (UTC) This links MoS prominently links to Wikipedia:Make only links relevant to the context, yet that page does not have a style-guideline...65 KB (10,226 words) - 06:05, 18 July 2021
- just tweaked the link slightly to reflect that "OVERLINK" is a redirect to "Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context". --Ckatzchatspy...189 KB (28,286 words) - 13:56, 23 March 2023
- titles likely to be relevant there. The only parts of them I would be comfortable using as sources, not external links, are any sections which are actually...269 KB (40,454 words) - 06:48, 30 January 2023
- is relevant and informative, mention it on the talk page and let other — neutral — Wikipedia editors decide whether to add the link. Links that are added...49 KB (7,356 words) - 04:29, 15 March 2023
- this page's archives back to number 36 (2017), and did not find what I was looking for, and prior to that I checked the project page and the MOS. Is there...157 KB (22,722 words) - 20:15, 28 April 2023
- subject (so is not in category 1, as there is no relevant context to add). The pratfall anecdote from the Gene Wilder article mentioned above seems like...128 KB (17,130 words) - 15:50, 4 February 2023
- directly relevant to the article". External links in lists directly violates that and ELNO:#13... "Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's...181 KB (26,887 words) - 06:48, 30 January 2023
- good links will make the creation of a correctly named article much easier for later writers. More explicitly, in Wikipedia:Make only links relevant to the...35 KB (5,567 words) - 14:47, 18 July 2014
- The "Notes and References" of R2-45, at number [7] provides a Convenience link to [1]. That webpage sources a google group message and provides a link...291 KB (45,787 words) - 12:50, 10 March 2023
- of wp:context, wp:btw with MOSLINK. Tony (talk) 04:47, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Hardly "ancient history", given that they are directly relevant to the principles...249 KB (35,058 words) - 09:46, 14 January 2024
- 23:41, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Looking back at this, and especially at Wikipedia talk:External links/Archive 35#External links in lists, but being unable to find...163 KB (23,844 words) - 23:28, 21 September 2021
- DNB (Archives) I just looked deeper at {{textinfo}} and can see that we should be using more components rather than ticking the little boxes at the bottom
- to me to have to post a notice here now that one can just check the category. — Jeff Q (talk) 20:18, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC) Do we need any archive of the former
- things to be done, the renaming will be a fair amount of work to make sure all links and references are updated too. --Swift (talk) 01:07, 7 May 2009 (UTC)