Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Only make links that are relevant to the context" on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking (redirect from Only make links that are relevant to the context)the context in the article, the following are usually not linked. I guess it's my perspective that geographic situation is often relevant to context for...177 KB (24,647 words) - 15:52, 30 June 2024
- talk:Make only links relevant to the context. --Menchi (Talk)â 09:39, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC) Most browsers has a option for displaying underlines on links or...48 KB (7,806 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- disliked all the years in Wikipedia being linked. Tempshill 23:06, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Make only links relevant to the context is not policy...36 KB (5,927 words) - 20:46, 6 March 2008
- a rephrase to "the most relevant" along with a guideline that a moderate number of links should be used, but the intent is the same. Daniel Quinlan 05:15...10 KB (714 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- link to potato in this article? It is a just common term with no particular relationship to the article on Wikipedia:Make only links relevant to the context...39 KB (6,160 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- violate Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context in that linking up such dates will not be relevant to the article's context or aid or facilitate...129 KB (19,290 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context#What should not be linked to Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context#Specific...40 KB (6,429 words) - 18:32, 25 August 2006
- extremes is the issue. I think we should go back to basics, and stick to the fram of "only make links that are relevant to the context." So in context, an article...243 KB (36,549 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- are the Ori 23:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC) It seems to me that links shouldn't be included in quotations unless they were in the original material (or are included...4 KB (682 words) - 16:54, 4 February 2023
- 2008 (UTC) Why is it necessary to have Wikipedia:Build the web, Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context, and this? This seems really...1 KB (161 words) - 05:30, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 46 (section Examples of when to link and not link solitary links (continued))link"; so the expression "There is no consensus whether the general principles of Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context apply for...30 KB (4,935 words) - 17:47, 1 November 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 45 (section Examples of when to link and not link solitary links)but at Wikipedia talk:Only make links that are relevant to the context (that would be specific principles for linking dates in that guideline then) --Francis...33 KB (5,008 words) - 15:34, 4 February 2023
- relevant. It also says most of what needs to be said. Also relevant to what to include inside a navigation box is Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant...5 KB (532 words) - 19:08, 29 March 2022
- See Wikipedia:Make only links relevant to the context for the reasons that it's usually undesirable to insert low-value chronological links; see also Wikipedia:Manual...36 KB (5,481 words) - 15:34, 4 February 2023
- about links, including the recommendations of Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context. ... ... There is less agreement about links to years...39 KB (5,494 words) - 17:48, 1 November 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Quotations should not contain wikilinks (section User:Hollow are the Ori blocked indefinitely)I recommend that you suggest this as an addition to Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context. It would seem to fit better there than...31 KB (4,987 words) - 17:12, 4 February 2023
- WP:MOSCAPS and WP:LEAD are mentioned above. WP:Only make links that are relevant to the context: Linking dates only for the purpose of autoformatting...4 KB (500 words) - 00:01, 22 May 2022
- centuries should only be linked if there is a strong reason for doing so. See Wikipedia:Make only links relevant to the context for the reasons that it's usually...37 KB (5,734 words) - 17:47, 1 November 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Archive D5 (section Just following the rules, folks)information. I believe this is in line with the principle Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context. What do other editors think? --John 21:14...24 KB (3,872 words) - 08:28, 15 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Red link/Archive 1 (section Discussions from Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context)Wikipedia talk:Only make links that are relevant to the context. I filed myself as an opponent of this guideline above, but only because the guideline for...136 KB (20,343 words) - 10:18, 3 April 2023
- text remains identical in both contexts. A final advantage of this - more relevant to the current discussion - is that if the text is kept in a template then
- context and more information, although unless relevant to the specific themes these are discouraged. It is highly recommended to add the quotation to
- to m:Interwiki map? Does this means that all Cookbook links on Wikibooks, like this link Cookbook:Recipes, start failing? That is, do interwiki links