| Oppose reason given:
|
What it really means:
|
| no evidence of working collaboratively
|
you haven't made enough friends yet to pass RfA
|
| not enough mainspace edits
|
you're 12
|
| too many userboxes
|
you're 12
|
| I can't read your signature
|
you're 12
|
| you're 12
|
I'm 12, but don't want to get opposed at my rfa later
|
| you've only been here 4 months, come back in three months and I'll support
|
I've never heard of you. In the next three months, I'm sure you'll screw something up, and I'll use those diffs to oppose next time
|
| per WP:NOTNOW
|
per WP:NOTEVER
|
| you use poor rationales in XfDs
|
you voted once to delete an article 8 months ago that I voted to keep
|
| I think you're a great user, but <insert gibberish here>
|
I don't like you (also: I don't like your nominator and wish to spite him)
|
| per lack of maturity
|
you opposed my RfA earlier
|
| I don't trust you with the block button
|
I don't trust you with the block button
|
| too many concerns
|
one of my friends already opposed and gave diffs. I didn't read the diffs, or look at your contribs, but hell, they gave diffs
|
| per answer to question 27B, part 1, follow up 3c, above.
|
whew! I wasn't finding anything in your contribs, but you typed "their" when you clearly meant "there", and so I can only conclude that because of your poor grasp of English and grammar, you will be a poor admin, cuz you know, admins have to communicate clearly
|
| per civility issues
|
You opposed my RfA earlier (also: you nommed my jibberish, unreferenced, non-notable in-universe, fictional character article for deletion) (also: You called me a dick when I was being a dick)
|
| Weak oppose
|
I oppose, but I don't want to hurt your feelings/don't want to seem uncivil and hurt my RfA chances
|
| Moral support (in the oppose section)
|
for way too many reasons to actually take the time to list. Besides, by the time I would finish typing out my reasons with diffs, I would end up edit-conflicting with the 'crat that snowed you under
|
| low edit summary usage
|
I had to actually load up all those diffs to try and find misbehavior because you didn't use swear words in your edit summary. And I found nothing.
|
| concerns from previous RfA(s) have not been addressed
|
you have addressed past concerns, but since I liked opposing you so much back then, I'm opposing again. Oh, and you have too many userboxes
|
| too quick to be involved in drama
|
four possibilities:
- I think you may have found my sockpuppets
- you are too good to be easily fooled
- you have a conscience
- too quick to be involved in drama
|
| hasn't demonstrated a need for the tools
|
too slow to be involved in drama.
|
| I want the crats to decide on this one
|
I don't understand how RFA works
|
| many editors I respect have opposed
|
my friends have spoken, and they don't like you.
|
| per lack of answer to my optional question
|
by not answering my question, you make me feel less important.
|
| per above
|
lots of other people have already opposed, so I'll jump on the bandwagon and oppose too. I wouldn't want to be the only supporter, it'll tank my own RfA later
|
| per above (may also mean:)
|
you pissed me off sometime in the past, and since I don't want to say that out of fear of getting flamed (again) by you, and since I don't quite remember what it was that you did, and because I'm entirely too lazy to go digging through diffs, I'll cover my ass with this
|
| sorry, but...
|
I'm not actually sorry, and allow me (you don't have a choice) to go into excruciating detail as to why I feel you are incompetent
|
