Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:SARCASM" on Wikipedia
- will never be tempted to resort to sarcasm. But if you somehow are, that's a really great idea. Better yet, use sarcasm before you use up all of your other...4 KB (457 words) - 18:56, 15 June 2024
- Sarcasm (band) was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further...1 KB (210 words) - 06:20, 22 April 2010
- Egypt's Sarcasm Society (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...94 bytes (33 words) - 03:46, 12 April 2013
- Egypt's Sarcasm Society (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...3 KB (423 words) - 03:46, 12 April 2013
- Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Sarcasm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...2 KB (154 words) - 01:50, 2 April 2022
- result was delete. J04n(talk page) 02:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC) Egypt's Sarcasm Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...9 KB (944 words) - 16:53, 6 February 2023
- right- you. The templates would not work unless someone messed with them.[sarcasm] Otherwise templates would look like this: Very, very boring. People just...3 KB (246 words) - 13:02, 13 July 2023
- current RfC is being turned into a battleground, along with snide remarks, sarcasm, and straw man arguments with the obvious intention of derailing the RfC...143 KB (302 words) - 18:33, 20 March 2023
- confused...this is not even an album! Do you know me?...then SHUT UP!!! Sarcasm is beauty 17:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Merge to Paper Trail. There doesn't seem...5 KB (459 words) - 10:58, 8 February 2023
- consider it better and I visit it more then BZPower which is the largest. (*sarcasm*suprise isn't it*sarcasm*) Matt "AgentA" 20:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)...288 bytes (50 words) - 20:20, 26 February 2006
- paragraphs that never really come to a point Thinly-veiled personal attacks Sarcasm The rush you feel through your veins as you type it Read surrounding posts...3 KB (388 words) - 02:27, 21 March 2024
- below. I'd like to propose the Wikipedia: Sarcasm Noticeboard to discuss situations where an editor uses sarcasm when an earnest response would be preferable...4 KB (449 words) - 07:34, 18 January 2024
- those posts for elsewhere. <sarcasm>It's as if Facebook thinks its users don't know anything about HTML and email.</sarcasm> Just another reason why I...3 KB (192 words) - 01:57, 25 March 2017
- about causing disruption – someone may miss that it was meant in humor or sarcasm and act on it. As honored in the village stocks, this succeeds the admin...4 KB (381 words) - 17:51, 7 May 2024
- (UTC) Support Looks good to me...<sarcasm> especially because it's an award that 3 former Phillies have won! </sarcasm> In all seriousness, nice work. Go...10 KB (252 words) - 22:38, 9 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Don't be inconsiderate Wikipedia:Etiquette and netiquette Wikipedia:Insignificant Wikipedia:No angry mastodons Wikipedia:Truce Wikipedia:Sarcasm...3 KB (244 words) - 20:24, 21 March 2024
- 22:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Delete <sarcasm>That's amazing! It's one of seven schools in a district!</sarcasm> Jonathan letters to the editor — things...3 KB (205 words) - 12:10, 8 February 2023
- hypocritical, and might even give further offense by giving the impression of sarcasm. Although they may fall into a non-apology grey area, "I'm sorry that I...4 KB (544 words) - 15:36, 16 January 2021
- notability ackoz 21:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC) <sarcasm>Wow, a statue that has been there since 1968!</sarcasm> Delete, fails notability. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:05...2 KB (159 words) - 03:45, 13 February 2022
- definitely delete stupid pages that contain only "asdfasdf." -- Ram-Man <sarcasm>I vehemently oppose giving this horrible vandal the privilege of administrator...2 KB (248 words) - 19:56, 9 March 2010
- but no more! ~ DanielTom (talk) 09:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC) The malicious sarcasm is not helpful here. -- Cirt (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Is there
- 2010 (UTC) Look like we are going nowhere since you have no argument but sarcasm, nice to see how you are treating people working here. Phe (talk) 15:45