Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jomontgeorge/Archive

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Jomontgeorge

Jomontgeorge (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

20 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Both accounts are only accounts to edit about this non notable organization belonging to Pooja Hedge.

Both are also interested in a song that involved Pooja Hegde.[1][2]

They are also supporting each other's POV on Talk:Beast (2022 film).[3][4] NavjotSR (talk) 09:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

24 May 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Same promotional editing on Pooja Hegde,[5][6] and on Beast (2022 Indian film) he cited "Times of India" with earlier sock to inflate collection,[7] and now he cites Times of India again to inflate collection.[8]  Looks like a duck to me. Notify Girth Summit. NavjotSR (talk) 06:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only cited with reliable sources. Then why are you saying sock. Please see my contributions, you can't see any problems with my edits. Please see articles that I've created. I don't even created any article for Pooja Hegde. Ranjith207 (talk) 07:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 May 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Edited similar articles as previous sock, restored edits of previously blocked sock [9] Dark-World25 (talk) 14:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles account that has edited that previous socks have as well include Samantha Ruth Prabhu filmography, Sam Jam, Rangasthalam (soundtrack), and Jigelu Rani. All in all, only 1 article that said account edited did not involve previous socks. Dark-World25 (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Account was created on the same day when the last account got blocked. same editing areas and same interests like editing Pooja hegde page The Chaos of Stars (talk) 11:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

25 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Same whitewashing on Pooja Hegde's page here as they did with other socks here and here. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

30 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Pro forma. Duck based on this request they made on my talk regarding Pooja Hegde and their attempt earlier this month to redirect to simplewiki Jigelu Rani, created by past sock Ancyran and maintained by several others since. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 04:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

30 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

New account, 12 days old and with 200 some edits, showing non-newbie edits from the get go. Then yesterday they restored many of block sock Rosyyyy's edits. The overlap on many articles: interactions.

Restorations, diff pairs:

[10][11]

[12][13]

[14][15]

[16][17]

And there's more of these if needed. Pikavoom Talk 09:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

19 August 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Created 2 days after last sock was blocked. Same claims about Pooja Hegde's movie "Beast" on edit summaries.[18][19]

Updating film gross on Jugjugg Jeeyo.[20][21] NavjotSR (talk) 17:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Dear NavjotSR, I don't know for what this. I changed "JGM" to "Jana Gana Mana", as the film's name is in short form.[22] I used full name. Next I changed as "Beast" is a successful film.[23] I added only what source says. On 7 August 2022 Kailash29792 removed commercial as "Beast" is a successful film He stated that "Beast, despite its reviews, was profitable: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/box-office/beast-box-office-collection-vijay-scores-fifth-consecutive-rs-250-crores/articleshow/91392690.cms". He also provided reference for his edit. On the basis I changed it to commercial and removed.[24] What is the wrong in it? Regarding Jugjugg Jeeyo, I only edited/reverted vandalism.[25][26][27][28] all the referenced are saying it's budget as ₹85 crore, but IP's are changing it into ₹110 crore. Once Grabup restored my good revision.[29] I not only edited in Pooja Hegde and Jugjugg Jeeyo. Is this the form of Sock. I can't understand what NavjotSR is saying. I don't edit in the form what Jomontgeorge and his accounts edit. Again, we are clearly two different people. Deepika o (talk) 02:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While I edit, I will discuss with more experienced users. If you check my contributions you can see most of my edits are saying "Rv vandalism". I think @Ab207, DareshMohan, Theoder2055, MNWiki845, and Jayanthkumar123: can say more regarding this. I'm going offline as I'm busy. Please discuss/take any action while I'm online. It's my request. Deepika o (talk) 02:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin: Why are you only looking about Pooja Hegde. Please check my other edits. Deepika o (talk) 14:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NavjotSR, There must be something wrong. There is no mistake with this editor Deepika o as far as I have experienced. I m sure that Deepika o is using only one account. So it’s not a sock. I think so you messaged the wrong person. Theoder2055 (talk) 12:28, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin: Please look my other contributions. I don't have 2–3 edits. I have more than 1400 contributions. Deepika o (talk) 14:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin: Please check Kailash29792's edit. He stated the reason for my edit. Deepika o (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin: I am telling again and again that there is nothing wrong with Deepika o. Deepika o is using only one account. Also, the user is not a sock. If you want you can ask other editors like @Kailash29792, MNWiki845, Ab207, and DareshMohan:. Theoder2055 (talk) 14:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 August 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Pro-forma filing. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 September 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

For there interest in requesting users to add awards/films to Pooja Hegde page. The first IP here. User:Deepika o talked about Sakshi Excellence Awards here and here about that same award for Pooja Hegde. DareshMohan (talk) 04:44, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 October 2022

Suspected sockpuppets


  • Created in August the same month after the block of last active sock Deepika o.
  • Both replies to notices on talk page with Template:Reply to and same edit summary [30][31]
  • Beast: [32][33][34]
  • Pooja Hegde same edit summary: [35][36]
  • JGM updates: [37][38]

. 117.230.93.129 (talk) 17:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 December 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Just want it on the record that this IP seems to be used by this user. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

29 April 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Pro forma filing. Blocked and tagged. 137.97.111.255 (talk) 08:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

29 April 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

For the first two, see discussion.

For the other,

Also, created around the same months previous socks and IPs were active. 137.97.111.255 (talk) 08:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 15:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not surprisingly, the two Tousifs are  Confirmed to each other. I'm going to AGF their explanation about lost passwords and block the second account sans tags, but leave their primary account alone. As for Bikapur, I don't really understand what's going on with this edit, but Bikapur is Red X Unrelated. None of these appear to be related to Jomontgeorge. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    As for Supersharanya I awarded barnstar to her for there contribution to Bollywood related drafts you can see in here history. Tousifzyan.15 is my alternative acc. Already cleared in userbox. I don't know why are you guys accusing me to be a sock of bikapur I am literally unrelated to that account. I just cut and paste to other section to make talk page less messy what I learn from experienced wikipedians and for what other editors thanked me also. Just a mistake was that when pasting I accidentally pasted my signature also there. I am open to any questions thank you. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 16:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

01 May 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Newly created account who jumped into editing a draft created by another sock of the puppeteer, Ancyran. The draft now moved into mainspace, SSMB28. Onel5969 TT me 09:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 November 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Same attempt to reduce budget of Kisi Ka Bhai Kisi Ki Jaan previously here and now here.

Plus, same technique of white-washing the film's heroine Pooja Hegde's page through IP edit-requesting on talk page, done by Anna here and here and by Naan here and here. Previous socks, Ranjith207 and DreamDon were previously removing this sentence here and here. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Because they all want to whitewash the same line about Pooja Hegde's career setback. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11 April 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Pro forma.

Falimy is fairly likely to Juvalkjolly, a sock of Jomontgeorge, the master behind the NaanReady account that they overlap on so many articles with, so I've blocked and tagged as a sock from that case. I'll note for the record that I just took a look at SonaMani1, who was very active at Hanu-Man before getting blocked for edit warring, when the Falimy account took over; they're  Technically indistinguishable from one Falimy, so I've reblocked and tagged.
— Girth Summit 15:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 03:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jomontgeorge/Archive&oldid=1221824168"