Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nunh-huh

Nunh-huh (contribs) has been making solid contributions since early Feb 2004 and has now made >2000 major edits, mainly on European royalty/nobility and medical issues, as well as participating in project-wide discussions, e.g. on the usefulness of navigational elements. JFW | T@lk 09:17, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for the nomination (though the process feels a bit like an extended past-life review), and accept it gladly. -- Nunh-huh 19:53, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Support

1. JFW | T@lk 09:17, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
2. And I don't feel that having an informative user page--or any at all--should be a requirement for adminship. Meelar 17:14, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
3. Definitely -- Cecropia | Talk 17:30, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
4. Looks to produce good work to me. - MykReeve 19:58, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
5. Tεxτurε 20:07, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
6. Dpbsmith 21:07, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
7. john 21:08, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
8. moink 21:33, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
9. Lst27 22:23, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
10. Catherine - talk 23:19, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
11. Angela. 00:39, May 17, 2004 (UTC)
12. --Beelzebubs 00:42, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
13. jengod 05:49, May 17, 2004 (UTC)
14. Support. --"DICK" CHENEY 12:06, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
15. Of course! MvHG 12:33, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
16. Looks good, but i am still curious about a user page -- Chris 73 | Talk 13:04, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
17. Why not? --Merovingian ↕ T@Lk 14:44, May 17, 2004 (UTC)
18. Solid contributor. Jwrosenzweig 16:15, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
19. Hephaestos|§ 02:09, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
20. Finlay McWalter | Talk 02:35, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
21. llywrch 03:01, 19 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
22. Jiang 00:39, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
23. SimonP 13:36, May 20, 2004 (UTC), agree completely that no user page is needed to be an admin
24. Decumanus | Talk 04:55, 22 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
25. Oh my yes. +sj+ 09:55, 2004 May 22 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Appears to be a considerate user. If he keeps on this track, I will support at a future time. But, IMHO, not fully experienced here yet. Kingturtle 23:32, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

• His (her?) edits look good, although he is pretty new here. But why doesn't he have an user page? (redirects to the talk page) -- Chris 73 | Talk 09:44, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's no policy on that. Nunh-huh prefers to be judged by his/her edits, and that's fine. I've seen admins whose user pages do very little to enhance understanding of "the person behind the username" :-) JFW | T@lk 11:29, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • It doesnt speak against him. I just would like to know before I vote. Similar questions have come up at other requests for adminship votes, too. -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:38, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]