Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 22

< July 21	July 23 >

July 22

File:15 ai logo transparent.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to non-free -FASTILY 00:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the discussion on Wikimedia Commons, this file should probably be reduced in size and marked as non-free, perhaps in a manner akin to File:Han shot first.gif. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

reduce size and quality, upload to wiki as opposed to commons, tag as non-free. Given the terms and conditions imposed when you visit 15.ai's website, its fair to assume there is some kind of copyright on this. Reduce size and quality, upload to wiki as non-free. Website T&Cs below:

This project (15.ai) is intended for non-commercial use. There are two requirements for using 15.ai for personal projects:
You MUST properly credit "15.ai." Including the URL "15.ai" somewhere in your post/video/project/etc. is sufficient. You MUST NOT use 15.ai voices with other TTS voices within your project. This is to prevent any confusion between 15.ai and other TTS projects. All code and models used for this website were written and trained as part of my research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The code and models are privately owned and are not to be sold or distributed for unauthorized use.
All requests are logged — including information about input text and character selection — in order to help the model learn from its mistakes using the generations that were scored the worst to learn better sentence cohesion and contextual prosody. All logs are expunged after being fed back into the model because I value your privacy and have no interest in reading through millions of lines of depravity.

>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The author of the image has released it under CC BY-SA 4.0. The website's terms and conditions are irrelevant as they only apply to audio created using 15.ai, not the image. --91.129.110.240 (talk) 23:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't cover the copyright of Twilight Sparkle, though. That is the issue I take with this image. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relicense as fair use Derivative of copyrighted work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:42, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Debbie Harry - Backfired.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sample is used to identify specific segments of the song, not the whole song itself. May fail WP:NFCC#8 unless I stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 06:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, song samples can only be used where they are supporting critical commentary. Simple inclusion in the infobox with no wording does not satisfy WP:NFCC >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:58, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HBHBHB, alternate cover.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Too similar to the main cover art which is also non-free and is the primary identification for the article. There is no rational that justifies the additional non-free cover art. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 10:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VSP FPIU 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work. 4 uploads of different sizes. Similar files found here and here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VSP FPIU 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work. 4 uploads of different sizes. Similar files found here and here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VSP FPIU 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work. 4 uploads of different sizes. See noms for other files above. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VSP FPIU 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work. 4 uploads of different sizes. See noms for other files above. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABS-CBN Sports and Action 2016 logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by File:ABS-CBN Sports and Action 2016 logo.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 15:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:56, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blackstar (Front Cover).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by File:Blackstar (Front Cover).svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 15:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CHILDREN MAKING TRADITIONAL POOKKALAM.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a photo of a photo. Permission needed from original photgrapher. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hobart Airport logo 2016.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by File:Hobart Airport logo.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 15:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as superseded by the SVG. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saorview logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by File:Saorview logo.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 15:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as superseded by the SVG. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rihannaparanoid.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A screenshot of Rihanna in the music video of Paranoid (Kanye West song) merely displays her in the music video. It doesn't help readers understand the music video (as a whole) or the song, so it may fail WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 17:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, rational does not clarify why the image is needed to convey something which can easily be done so in words. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Actor Sivaji Ganesan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image claimed to be freely licensed and is sourced from a blogspot post indicating that the image is freely licensed, but this looks like a publicity photo and can be widely found all over the internet. I doubt very much that the blogger who posted the image on their blog is the actual copyright holder. Whpq (talk) 19:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure - I did a reverse image search on this and it does appear that the image is widely used and available but hard to ascertain the original source. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Csimangatarem.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim to own work given same claim was made for Google street view photos. This appears to be taken from Twitter. See https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzcjSnRUsAANIkN.jpg Whpq (talk) 20:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete dubious claim of own work per rational above. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CSI Mall (San Carlos City, Pangasinan).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarked with RD Design and Associates, this looks to be conceptual art from an architectural firm. VRT confirmation of that the uploader truly has the rights would be needed. Whpq (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree with above. Watermarked and no evidence permission has been sought to use the image. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stephanie Kugelman.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source website indicates non-free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, the image is from flicker with a license incompatible for use on Wikipedia. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.