Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 May 28

< May 27	May 29 >

May 28

File:L Brands Logo Official.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:58, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Updated logo available on Wikimedia Commons. La Senza and Henri Bendel are no longer owned by L Brands, and the new logo reflects this. LABcrabs (talk) 01:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 23:53, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rio Grande Valley Dorados Helmet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Yamla (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free helmet image whose use fails WP:NFCC#3a in Rio Grande Valley Dorados. There is already a non-free file (Rio Grande Valley Dorados) of the team's logo being used in the main infobox of the article for primary identification purposes, so there's no need for another file basically showing the same logo on a helmet to be used per NFCC#3a. In additional, there may also be some WP:NFCC#4 and WP:NFCC#10a issues as well since the source cited for the helmet is only given as Arena Football League, but there no indication where this actual files comes from. Was it downloaded from an official website and then reuploaded to Wikipedia? Was the only the logo downloaded and then added to the helmet imagery by the uploader or someone else, and then uploaded to Wikipedia. If the helmet imagery was created by someone other than the team, then it might not be an official team image even though it might be based upon photos of what the helmet looks like.

Finally, this file was orginally tagged for speedy deletion per WP:G4 since it basically is the same as File:Rio Grande Valley Dorados Helmet 2019.png (see here) which was deleted per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 March 21#File:Rio Grande Valley Dorados Helmet 2019.png, but per the suggestion of the admin who closed the first FFD, the {{db-g4}} tagged was removed and the file brought to FFD for more discusison.

This file has the same non-free issues as the one which was deleted and the only real difference between the two files is the coloring and design of the helmet. The deleted file was sourced to the team's official website (see here), but the actual file itself couldn't also been found at that source. The file discussed here was uploaded a few days ago and the uploader has stated the file should be kept per File talk:Rio Grande Valley Dorados Helmet.png#File talk:Rio Grande Valley Dorados Helmet.png. The question here is not whether the file shows the helmet actually used by the team, but whether two non-free files providing bascially the same information for primary identification purposes are needed per WP:NFCC.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LFBLogo123.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:12, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, dark, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Assuming the file might someday be used again (if it ever was used), I'm not sure why this is licensed as {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. Although the UK's TOO is pretty low per c:COM:TOO United Kingdom, this might be too simple even for copyright protection in the UK. If it can be converted to {{PD-logo}}, it should be moved to Commons. If the file was used anywhere it was most likely used in London Fire Brigade. I checked the article's page history around the time the file was uploaded, but wasn't able to find a version where the file was being used. There were some versions where the infobox image at the time was a red link; so, maybe this was uploaded as a possible replacement but never got actually used. There no reason for Wikipedia to host this file if it's not being used and it can't be moved to Commons; so, unless someone finds a use for it in that case, I agree that it should be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Previously discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 30#File:LFBLogo123.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Craig-airport-logo.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 June 9. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:12, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Craig-airport-logo.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Herlong-airport-logo.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Cecil-airport-logo.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Jacksonville Aviation Authority (logo).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NemoAerial.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot, watermarked, unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 10:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly taken from Terraserver.com --𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 16:59, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Redox balance equation 1.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GIF that was created to illustrate what correction needed to be made in a pre-existing SVG (File:Redox eqn 1.svg), that has now been made. DMacks (talk) 12:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 23:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.