Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 March 21

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brilliant Chang as the Limehouse Spider.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Philafrenzy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Very much oversized non-free image (now at 1.5Mpx) - there is no rationale for such a very large size as stated in WP:NFC - At the extreme high end of the range, non-free images where one dimension exceeds 1,000 pixels, or where the pixel count approaches 1 megapixel, will very likely require a close review to verify that the image needs that level of resolution. Editors should ensure that the image rationale fully explains the need for such a level of detail. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment If this is reduced in size it is possible that the text in the bottom right will become illegible. If this happens it will be important to transcribe it into the image description and possibly caption. Thryduulf (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails NFCC#8. The fact that Chang was depicted by cartoonists as a spider can plainly be conveyed by text alone. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 March 30. MBisanz ^talk 17:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:GE9X cutaway.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 March 30. MBisanz ^talk 17:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boeing 777X launch.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rio Grande Valley Dorados Helmet 2019.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NostalgiaBuff97501 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free image which is not needed per WP:NFCC#3a. There is already a non-free file of the logo (File:Rio Grande Valley Dorados.png) being used for primary identification purposes in the main infobox; so, there's no need for two non-free files which are providing essentially the same information. If the color of the helmet is worth mentioning in the article, it can be sufficiently done so using text per WP:FREER. This file was prodded for deletion, but deprodded by the uploader; so, I'm bringing it's non-free use up for discussion here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• This file is THE helmet that is being used by the team as is evident by a YouTube video of an actual game payed a week and a half ago. The link can be found on the team's page and the proof is right there. NostalgiaBuff97501 (talk) 09:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whether this file actually shows the helmet used by the team has nothing to do with why its non-free use is being discussed here. There are two logos being used in the infobox that are basically identical and provide the same encyclopedic information to the reader, but there's no need for two such files per Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. The logo file shows the teams logo more clearly and it seems better for that one to be kept; however, if you think it's better for the reader to see the helmet file, then perhaps that's the one which should be kept. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austin Wild Helmet 2018.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NostalgiaBuff97501 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

For similar reasons as given above for #File:Rio Grande Valley Dorados Helmet 2019.png, two non-free files basically showing the same logo and providing the same encyclopedic information are not needed for primary identification purposes in the main infobox per WP:NFCC#3a. Whether its better to keep this file or File:Austin Wild.png can be discussed, but the logo file does seem to be better for identification purposes than the helmet file; so, that's the one I would suggest keeping. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:39, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.