Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaft
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yaft
- Yaft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article was prodded, with 2 supporting prods. Has been deprodded and while modified, still unremarkable and the sources cited don't appear to be WP:RS. Not just a neologism, a neologistic acronym. Shadowjams (talk) 03:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – No notability shown: we aren't a dictionary, but especially not a miscellaneous word database. American Eagle (talk) 03:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: it's just a collection of unremarkable, unverified facts, and there is no evidence given that these acronyms are used by large enough sections of society to make them in any way notable. -- roleplayer 08:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unverified neologism. I declined speedy but there really is nothing encyclopedic here. Pedro : Chat 11:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not even suitable for Wiktionary. treelo radda 16:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologism, no reliable sources. I was unable to find any sources, except for various products using the name, and The Free Dictionary, which I believe copies its information from Wikimedia pages and the like. Cnilep (talk) 16:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (but if it were going to be kept, it would have to be at YAFT anyway). +Angr 17:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.