Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Hjelte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

William Hjelte

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Does not qualify WP:BLP. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This person passed BLP and has been significantly covered by multiple reliable sources, such as Kotaku, The Daily Dot, Nintendo Enthusiast, and gamersyndrome. He has also received minor coverage from this source [1]. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 18:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above. Subject has a multitude of well documented, independent secondary sources. Satisfies notability guidelines deliniated by WP:BIO.--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 05:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well known figure in smash community and significantly covered by well known sources. Thehack771 (talk) 20:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above. Covered by well known sources, this person passes BLP and is extremely notable in the Smash community (Leffen has taken a set on ALL FIVE Melee gods, making himself a Demigod in some sort). UltraDark^{:) 2 CHAT} 21:49, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.