Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wicket Wacky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Woody Woodpecker. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wicket Wacky

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cartoon episode. This gets a few Google books hits, but they are all brief mentions that do not establish SIGCOV. Note that the reference included, The Walter Lantz Cartune Encyclopedia, is not a book like it appears to be, but actually brings up [1] when I Google it. Looking around at the Internet Animation Database, I'm not convinced that this is an RS, or at least enough of one to serve as the sole source for an article. Also open to soft delete and redirect to ~~Woody Woodpecker~~Woody Woodpecker (film series) (better target Hog Farm (talk) 23:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)). Note that there are literally dozens of articles like this, mostly sourced to said Cartune Encyclopedia. Hog Farm (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article appears to have been created by now-blocked sock. Hog Farm (talk) 03:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Woody Woodpecker, since subject lacks independent notability. -The Gnome (talk) 11:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to same target mentioned by nom and previous comment. Cannot find any significant coverage, and most of the article as it stands is just indiscriminate trivia. Bait30 ^Talk? 21:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on google it only has few mentions Georgiamarlins (talk) 22:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.