Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What's Up: Balloon to the Rescue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete without prejudice for its failure to meet WP:NF. Recreation or undeletion okay if and or when notability can be established. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What's Up: Balloon to the Rescue

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell, the only thing notable about this film is that it was terrible (and not even well-known and terrible). I deleted the negative comments from the article because they were unsourced but you can look back at the earlier versions. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Sources like Tooncrap are not reliable sources. The film gathered minimal coverage from sources of questionable reliability as a knock-off of Up [1][2][3]. Overall, I'm not satisfied this film meets WP:NFILM. Mz7 (talk) 16:48, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vídeo Brinquedo. I found a review by Film School Rejects, but that's the only truly reliable source I could find. For the most part this was pretty much just ignored by both English and Spanish language RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.