Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westbury and United Banks Hockey Club

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 10:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Westbury and United Banks Hockey Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm having difficulty seeing how this orphaned article about a field hockey club meets Wikipedia:Notability (sports) and I can't find enough reliable third party sources to show it meets GNGRod talk 19:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- I suspect that this was an amateur club at the time when it was in the Premier League. That puts it in the top league of its sport. I suspect that we would have allowed club articles in the period when Rugby Union was an amateur sport; so why not hockey? Peterkingiron (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure what you mean by Premier League. Although I'm having problems finding sources to give clarity it appears to have been in West Hockey Association (field hockey) from which winners can progress into the England Hockey League. It seems they are currently in the 2nd tier (Championship) of the local division.— Rod talk 16:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.