Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warner Bros. Sing Along

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Bros. Sing Along

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. The lone provided source comes off as a lightly edited press release, and I wasn't able to find any other coverage online other than database entries. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 22:15, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree. While these may have been a nice part of certain peoples' childhoods, they don't seem to have any real lasting notability. Without the kind of reliable source coverage that we need to write a proper page, deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete VHS is dead, and with it these barely-bought and remembered only by 'studio stans' nostalgia cash-ins designed to keep kids distracted. Nate • (chatter) 04:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There do not appear to be any reliable sources discussing this video series. Searching for sources turns up some sales listings, but that's about it. Rorshacma (talk) 15:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. can't find any reason not support nomination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grmike (talk • contribs) 04:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nowhere near notable enough to warrant its own article and can instead be mentioned on any other of the numerous WB-related pages. No content therein nor legitimate sourcing. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 04:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable straight to VHS release. Not a reference in sight when I had a poke around either. --Jack Frost (talk) 09:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Daask (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.