Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Pengelbew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Pengelbew

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV. There are two sources in the article, both match reports that mention the subject once. I was unable to find any significant sources during a search. Alvaldi (talk) 21:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Oceania. Alvaldi (talk) 21:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Besides the two links attached, there is a source in Dutch titled "13-0 in Zwolle en de introductie van de Walter Pengelbew-regel", but I don't believe that source will make the subject notable as it still fails WP:GNG. Curious to see what fellow editors think of that Dutch source. AmshitBalcon (talk) 22:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sources available do not pass GNG. Frank Anchor 21:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I originally PRODed the article. I stand by the rationale I wrote for the PROD: "Only claim to fame is allowing a record number of goals in lopsided losses. No sign of significant coverage." Pichpich (talk) 19:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.